期刊文献+

论批判性思维的临界性 被引量:3

Study on the Criticality of Critical Thinking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 批判性思维(critical thinking)是一个英文外来词,在这个词中,critical除了具有"批判性的"的意义外,还有一个更重要的意义——"临界性的",但却被中文作者和中文文献所忽略。批判性思维的临界性首先表现为思维过程自身的临界性:一方面,人类思维具有自指性,即后起的思维可以对前行的思维进行再思维(反思),因此,人类思维可能产生自相缠绕,这是悖论产生的根源,也是思维临界性的一种表现;另一方面,人的思维过程是多维度、多通道的,演绎与非演绎,分析与综合,逻辑与心理,语言与修辞,语言与逻辑,语言与心理,这些都是思维过程的不同侧面,是不可分割的,批判性思维也是这种临界性的反映。除此之外,批判性思维还具有元思维或高阶思维的特征、具有多学科和多领域交叉的特征。批判性思维的这些特征可在语言学(语用学)、逻辑学(假言推理、三段论、溯因推理)、决策理论(博弈论、期望效用理论、前景理论、双系统加工理论)中获得证明。 The critical thinking is an English alien word whose original meaning will be discussed in this paper. This concept'critical' has two basic semantic items in The Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English :a. critical of;b. of the borderline.But the second meaning is often ignored in the Chinese scholarship. The borderline state of critical thinking is the manifestation of the criticality of thinking process. That is,human thinking has its own reference,and regressive thinking will ruminate the progressive thinking,which is the reason for the source of paradox,and also a manifestation of the criticality of critical thinking.Critical thinking possesses the features of a certain meta-thinking and multidisplinary subject,which will be verified in linguistic theories(especially pragmatics),logic(especially modus ponens,syllogism,abduction),and decision-making theory(including game theory,expected utility theory and prospect theory,the dual system processing theory.
作者 蔡曙山 殷岳
出处 《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期33-43,160,共11页 Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目:15ZDB017
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献19

  • 1蔡曙山.一个与卢卡西维兹不同的亚里士多德三段论形式系统[J].哲学研究,1988(4):33-41. 被引量:16
  • 2蔡曙山.关于哲学、心理学和认知科学的12个问题——与约翰·塞尔教授的对话[J].学术界,2007(3):7-17. 被引量:34
  • 3E. Walker, Cognitive Science, 1978: Report of the State of the Art Committee to the Advisors of theAlfred P. Sloan Foundation, Unpublished, http://www, cbi. umn. edu/hostedpublications/pdf/Cognitive Science 1978 _ OCR.pdf, p. 75.
  • 4D. Norman, "What is Cognitive Science?" in D. Norman, ed., Perspectives on Cognitive Science, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1981, p. 1.
  • 5George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and lts Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 3.
  • 6Cf. John R. Searle, "Social Ontology, " Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress, London: King's College Publications, 2008.
  • 7B.R赫根汉.《心理学史导论》(上册),郭本禹等译,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2004年,第411页.
  • 8W.W.巴特利.《维特根斯坦传》,杜丽燕译,上海:东方出版中心,2000年,第116页.
  • 9Z. Pylyshyn, Information Science: Its Roots and Relations as Viewed from the Perspective of Cognitive Science, in F. Machlup and U. Mansfield, eds., The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages, New York: Wiley, 1983, p. 76.
  • 10R, A. Griggs and J. R. Cox, "The Elusive Thematic-materials Effect in Wason's Selection Task," British Journal of Psychology, vol. 73, 1982, pp. 407-420.

共引文献133

同被引文献32

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部