摘要
"词史"与词总集密切相关,但其学术意义至近代方逐步为治词者发掘。晚清民国时期,传统词人群体藉由编纂总集的方式对尚留余音的清词史进行回顾总结,或沿袭传统词学存词存人的理路;但也有精选之本通过点次名家勾稽清词史的发展线索,接轨于现代意义上的文学史研究。考察清词总集对"词史"不同维度的呈现,正可见出传统词学向现代学科转型的轨迹。较之新派学者编辑词选以推衍清词及词体的"末路史",传统学人对清词流派、分期及词体变革的探索更能体现"历史家之态度",为今日清词研究之滥觞。
The study of Ci's history is closely related with the Ci anthologies,but its academic significance was not valued enough until the modern times. During the late Qing Dynasty and the period of the Republic of China,traditional Ci writing group reviewed and summarized the development course of Qing Ci,which still maintained vitality at that time. They used the classical method to record the information of writers and their works,thus some anthologies of vital writers and works turned up,which aimed to show the development course of Qing Ci and approached the modern research of literary history. In studying different kinds of the Ci anthologies,we may find out the track of modern transformation of the traditional Ci study. Compared with the radical scholars who alleged that Ci had come to the end,traditional scholars showed their historian attitudes in presenting the genre and the period division of Qing Ci,which can be regarded as the origin of the Ci study today.
出处
《云南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期166-172,188,共7页
Social Sciences in Yunnan