期刊文献+

水中分娩对母婴感染的影响 被引量:2

Effects of water birth on maternal and infant infection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨水中分娩对母婴感染的影响。方法选取行水中分娩的产妇160例,随机抽取同期160例传统经阴道分娩者(传统分娩组)作为对照。两组新生儿娩出后取咽及耳拭子作病原微生物培养,并于出生后2 d抽血查血常规和C反应蛋白(CRP);两组产妇于分娩2 d后抽血查血常规、CRP和降钙素原(PCT);并观察母婴感染相关的临床表现。结果两组母婴感染临床表现比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。传统分娩组产妇WBC为(9.65±3.16)×109,CRP为(37.32±10.13)mg/L,PCT为(0.06±0.05)ng/ml,而水中分娩组产妇WBC为(9.31±3.25)×109,CRP为(35.57±9.54)mg/L,PCT为(0.06±0.03)ng/ml,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。传统分娩组新生儿WBC为(11.48±3.54)×109,CRP为(6.42±1.74)mg/L,而水中分娩组新生儿WBC为(11.39±2.50)×109、CRP为(6.68±1.52)mg/L,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。水中分娩组咽拭子阳性18例,耳拭子阳性27例;传统分娩组咽拭子23份阳性,耳拭子32份阳性,两组咽耳拭子病原微生物培养阳性率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论水中分娩并未增加母婴感染。 Objective To investigate the effects of water birth on maternal and infant infection. Methods One hundred and sixty pregnant women who delivered underwater were enrolled in the water birth group and 160 pregnant women who delivered vaginally during the same time were enrolled as control group. Their infants were taken throat and ear swabs for pathogenic microorganism culture, and checking the blood routine and CRP.The blood routine, CRP and PCT were compared between the two groups. And observe the clinical manifestations of maternal and infant infection. Results There were no significant difference in the clinical manifestations of maternal and infant infection between two groups. The WBC, CRP and PCT of the mothers of water birth group were(9.31 ±3.25) ×109,(35.57±9.54) mg / L and(0.06±0.03)ng / ml, respectively, and were(9.65±3.16)×109,(37.32±10.13) mg / L and(0.06±0.05) ng / ml, respectively, in the control group. The WBC and CRP of the infant of water birth group were(11.39 ±2.50) ×109 and(6.68 ±1.52) mg / L,respectively, and were(11.48 ±3.54) ×109 and(6.42 ±1.74) mg / L, respectively, in the control group. There were no significant differences in WBC, CRP and PCT between two groups. There were 18 positive cases and 27 positive cases in throat and ear swabs for pathogenic microorganism culture in water birth group. In contrast, there were 23 positive cases and 32 positive cases in throat and ear swabs for pathogenic microorganism culture in control. There were no significant differences in the positive rates of pathogenic microorganism culturein throat and ear swabsbetween two groups(P〉0.05).Conclusion Water birth did not increase the maternal and infant infections.
出处 《热带医学杂志》 CAS 2016年第6期756-758,788,共4页 Journal of Tropical Medicine
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2012B061700015)
关键词 水中分娩 母婴 降钙素原 Water birth Infant Procalcitonin
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献7

  • 1董淑筠,金皖玲,程蔚蔚,汪平.水中分娩462例临床分析[J].上海医学,2005,28(9):737-740. 被引量:31
  • 2Thoeni A, Zech N, Moroder L, et al. Review of 1600 water births. Does water birth increase the risk of neonatal infection? [J]. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med, 2005, 17(5) :357-361.
  • 3Fehervary P,Lauinger-Lorsch Z, Hof H, et al. Water birth: microbiological colonisation of the newborn, neonatal and maternal infection rate in comparison to conventional bed deliveries [ J ]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2004, 270( 1 ) :6-9.
  • 4Zanetti-Dauenbach R, Capaire O, Maertens A, et al. Water birth: is the water an additional resevoir for group B streptococcus? [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2006, 273 (4) : 236-238.
  • 5Odent M. Birth under water [ J]. Lancet, 1983,31:1476-1477.
  • 6Geissbuhler V, Eberhard J. Experience with water births: a prospective longitudinal study of 9 years with almost 4000 water births [ J ]. Gynakol Geburtshifliche Rundsch, 2003, 43 ( 1 ) : 12-18.
  • 7Nguyen S, Kuschel C, Teele R. Water birth: a near-drowning experience [J]. Pediatrics, 2002, 110(2):411-413.

共引文献16

同被引文献49

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部