期刊文献+

过于监督对护理工作绩效的影响 被引量:1

The Influence of Over Supervision on the Performance of Nursing Work
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过调查过于监督对位于不同特性职位的护士绩效的影响,探寻过于监督与任务重要性对护士绩效的作用机理,为医院护理部门改善管理环境,提升护士绩效提供参考。方法采用问卷调查的方式,对深圳光明区医院157名,珠海市妇幼保健院275名,护士及护士长进行调研,应用描述性分析,相关性分析和多元线性回归等方法对调研数据进行处理。结果过于监督与护士的工作绩效显著地负相关(r=-0.266,P<0.01);过于监督对员工绩效有显著的负向影响(β=-0.270,P<0.001);工作重要性对过于监督与员工绩效间的关系有显著的调节作用(β=0.703,P<0.01),具体为当工作重要性较高时过于监督对员工绩效不会造成影响,当工作重要性较低的时候,过于监督会对员工绩效产生负向影响(βL=-2.963,P<0.01,βH=-0.444,P<0.01)。结论过于监督对护士绩效有负面影响,这种影响随着护士感知到的任务重要性的升高而减弱。 Objective Through the investigation on over supervision in positions with different characteristics on the performance of nurses and exploreover supervision and task importance of nurses' performance mechanism,for the nursing department of the hospital to improve environmental management,enhance nurses' performance to provide a reference.MethodsBy means of questionnaire survey,in Shenzhen Guangming district hospital 157 nurses,275 nurse in Zhuhai maternal and child health hospital for research,descriptive analysis,correlation analysis and multiple linear regression method of survey data.ResultsToo much supervision and nurse the job performance significantly negative correlation (r=-0.266,P 〈 0.01). Over supervision have significant negative effects (β =-0.270,P 〈 0.001 ); the importance of the work on over supervision relationship between employee performance and has significant moderating effect (β = 0.703,P 〈 0.01),specifically when the importance of the work of higher too supervision have significant influence on employee performance is not,when the importance of the work of lower too supervision will have a significant negative to the effect of ( βL=-2.963,P 〈 0.01,βH=-0.444,P〈0.01) .Conclusion Over supervision has a significant negative impact on the performance of nurses,and this effect decreases with the increase of the perceived task importance of nurses.
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2016年第11期229-231,共3页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 过于监督 护理 工作绩效 工作重要性 Over supervision Nursing Work performance Work importance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Yukl G. Managerial Leadershitx A Review of Theory and Research[ J ]. Journal of Management, 1989, 15 ( 2 ) : 251-289.
  • 2Ashforth B. Petty Tyranny in Organizations [J] . Human Relations, 1994, 47 (7) : 755-778.
  • 3Kant L, Skogstad A, Torsheim T, et al. Beware The Angry Leader: Trait Auger and Trait Anxiety as Predictors of Petty Tyranny [J ] . Leadership Quarterly, 2013, 24 ( 1 ) : 1116-124.
  • 4Aquino K, Lamertz K. A Relational Model of Workplace Victimization: Social Roles and Patterns of Victimization in Dyadic Relationships [J ] .Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89 ( 6 ) : 1023-1034.
  • 5Aquino K, Than S. Workplace Victimization: Aggression from The Target's Perspective[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 21)1)9,60( 1 ): 717-741.
  • 6Lipman Blumen J. The Allure of Toxic Leaders : Why We Follow Destructive Bosses and Corrupt Politicians-and How We Can Survive Them [ M ] . Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • 7Tepper B J. Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda [ J ] . Journal of Management, 2007, 33 (3) : 261-289.
  • 8Tepper B J. Consequences of Abusive Supervision [J ] . Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43 ( 2 ) : 178-190.
  • 9Aryee S, Chen Z X, Sun L Y, et al. Antecedents and Outcomes of Abusive Supervision: Test of A Trickle-Down Model [ J ] . Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92 ( 1 ) : 191.
  • 10Harris K J, Kacmar K M, Ziw~uska S. An Investigation of Abusive Supervision as a Predictor of Perfomlance and the Meaning of Work as a Moderator of The Relationship [J ] . The Leadership Quarterly, 2007, 18 (3) : 252-263.

二级参考文献18

  • 1[1]Swann W B Jr, Stein-Seroussi A, Giesler B. Why people self-verify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 62:392~306
  • 2[2]Swann W B Jr, Rentfrow P J, Guinn J. Self-verification: The search for coherence. In: M Leary, J Tagney ed. Handbook of self and identity. Guilford, New York, 2002
  • 3[3]Swann W B Jr, De la Ronde C, Hixon J G. Authenticity and Positivity Strivings in Marriage and Courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 6:857~869
  • 4[4]Swann W B JR. To be adored or to be known: the interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. In: Sorrentino R M, Higgins E T ed. Motivation & Cognition(vol.2). New York: Guilford Press, 1990. 408~448
  • 5[5]Chris De La Ronde, Swarn W B Jr. Caught in the crossfire: positivity and self-verification strivings among people with low self-esteem. In: Roy F Baumeister ed. Self-esteem: The Puzzle of Low Self-Regard. Lenum Press, New York, 1993. 147~165
  • 6[6]Swarn W B Jr, j Gregory hixon, Alan Stein-Seroussi,et al.Fleeting gleam of praise: cognitive processes underlying behavioral reactions to self-relevant feedback. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1990, 59:17~26
  • 7[7]Swarn W B Jr, Brett W Pelham, Douglas S Krull. Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 57:782~791
  • 8[8]Swarn W B Jr, Bosson J K, Pelham B W. Different partners, different selves: The verification of circumscribed identities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002, 28:1215~1228
  • 9[9]Yaacov Trope, Efrat Neter. Reconciling competing motives in self-evaluation: the role of self-control in feedback seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 66:646~657
  • 10[10]Peter J Burke, Jan E Stets. Trust and commitment through self-verification. Social Psyhology Quarterly, 1999, 62:347~366

共引文献17

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部