期刊文献+

一种基于心气论的道德哲学:王夫之的孟子学及其当代意蕴 被引量:1

A Moral Philosophy Based on the Doctrine of Vital Energy and Affective Mindset: Wang Fuzhi's Study of Mencius and Its Contemporary Significance
原文传递
导出
摘要 王夫之在《读四书大全说》中的《孟子说》部分着力于心性问题,抉发孟学精义。同时在此过程中发展出一种高严的道德哲学。以孟子思想为依托,王夫之驳告子,批释老,辨正程朱陆王之失,提出气无不善而情可为恶说,进而突显道心对于成性的意义。王夫之的孟子学蕴含了一种基于心气概念的道德哲学,涉及道德形上学、道德生存论、道德工夫论和道德心理学等多个层次,同时也对以下问题给出了自己独特的回答:人为什么应该是道德的?如何成为道德的人?应该道德的人何以有不道德的行为? In his examination focusing on the issue of human's natural tendency and affective mindset in Discussions after Reading the Great Collection of Commentaries on the Four Books (《读四书大全说》),Wang Fuzhidevelops from the doctrine of Mencius a moral philosophy based on the doctrine of vital energy ( "气" ) and affective mindset ( "心" ). Base on Mencius, Wang criticizes Gaozi, Buddhism and Laozi on the one hand, and the Cheng Brothers, Zhu Xi, Lu Jiuyuan and Wang Yangming on the other. Wang advocates that vital energy is always good while emotions can be evil, and emphasizes the significance of the affective mindset of Dao to the accomplishment of human's natural tendency. Wang's ethics embodied in his interpretation of Mencius involves moral metaphysics, moral existentialism, moral cultivation and moral psychology, providing some unique answers to the following questions: Why be moral? How to be moral? Why may humans that shall be moral act immoral?
作者 刘梁剑
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期38-44,共7页 Academic Monthly
基金 公民道德与社会风尚协同创新中心的支持
关键词 王夫之 孟子 气善 性善 性情 道心 天人共同体 Wang Fuzhi, Mencius, the goodness of vitaltendency, human's natural tendency and emotions, affectiveenergy, thegoodnessmindset of Dao, Natureof human's naturalhuman community
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1王夫之.《船山全书》第6册,长沙:岳麓书社,1996年,第1068,1090,1066页.
  • 2赵岐,孙爽.《孟子注疏》,北京:北京大学出版社,1999年,第295页.
  • 3王夫之.《船山全书》第6册,长沙:岳麓书社,1991年,第126页.
  • 4王夫之:《船山全书》第8册,岳麓书社1996年版,第910页.
  • 5程颢,程颐.《二程集》.第15页,北京:中华书局,2004.
  • 6Liu JeeLoo, "Wang Fuzhi's Philosophy of Principle (Li) Inherent in Qi," John Makeham ed., Dao Companion to Neo-Confucian Philosophy, Springer, 2010, p. 356.
  • 7Huang Yong, " 'Why Be Moral?' The Cheng Brothers' Neo-Confucian Answer," In Journal of Religious Ethics 36.2. 2008, pp. 322--330; Huang Yong. Confucius." A Guide for the Perplexed, Blcomsbury, 2013, pp. 71 --78.
  • 8Kai Nielson, Why Be Moral, Prometheus Books, 1989, pp. 286--287.
  • 9Huang Yong, Confucius, p. 73.
  • 10Liu JeeLoo, "Wang Fuzhi's Philosophy of Principle (Li) Inherent in Qi," p. 356.

二级参考文献4

  • 1黎靖德.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1986..
  • 2陈淳.北溪字义[M].北京:中华书局,1983..
  • 3王夫之.读四书大全说[M].北京:中华书局,1975.660,659,660,662,664,661,662,663,663,676,676.
  • 4唐君毅.唐君毅全集[M].台北:学生书局,1990.

共引文献59

同被引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部