期刊文献+

脱销情境下消费者会购买相似品吗——自我建构视角的分析 被引量:22

Will Similar Products Be Chosen under the Out-of-stock Situation? Analysis on the Perspective of Self-construal
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现有文献片面地聚焦偏好产品脱销带来的负面效应,且对于脱销如何影响可得产品的选择缺乏一致结论。本研究根据与脱销产品在主观感知的差异程度,将可得产品划分为相似品和非相似品,并结合情境效应的相关研究,提出在呈现产品脱销信息情境下,自我建构对相似产品选择存在差异影响;同时不同脱销诱因会传递差异化的情境线索,并对自我建构的上述效应起到强化或抑制作用;而这种强化或抑制作用则是通过信息处理流畅性对购买意愿产生影响,且处理流畅性的中介效应受到自我建构的调节。 There exist some articles partially focusing on the negative effects of preferred alternative out-of-stock. And a consistent conclusion has not yet been formed about how out- of-stock affecting the choice of available products. According to the differentiation level of human's subjective perception toward the available products and out-of-stock products, the study sorts the available products into similar alternatives and non-similar alternatives. Some scholars think that out-of-stock passes on perceived scarcity and increases the purchase urgency of consumers. In order to avoid inaction regret, consumers would increase purchases of similar alternatives. Some other researchers point out that out-of-stock would provoke negative emotions and cause psychological reactance. Under "boomerang effect", consumers probably will choose non-similar alternatives or make choice deferral out of reasserting freedom in their purchase decisions. This study, combiried with the related researches on context effect, draws to the following conclusions. Firstly, different kinds of self- construal can function deferentially on the choice of available products under the context of out-of-stock information presented. Consumers of interdependent (vs. independent) self-construal prefer to choose similar alternatives, whereas consumers of independent (vs. interdependent) self-construal would rather to choose non- similar alternatives. Secondly, various out-of-stock inducements can deliver different context cues (out-of-stock resulting from high demand delivers "popularity cues", while out-of-stock induced by limited supply transmits "scarcity cues"), which may strengthen or weaken the impacts of self-construal. Specifically, compared with context with no out-of-stock inducement, out-of-stock induced by limited supply will promote (reduce) their purchase will for consumers who are mainly independent (interdependent) self- construal, while out-of-stock resulting from high demand will further reduce (promote) their purchase will. Finally, this research also finds that the strengthening or weakening effect influences purchase will through the processing fluency of the information, and the mediating effect of this kind of fluency is moderated by self-construal. Findings in this paper make proper supplements for research in context effect, phantom decoy effect and out-of-stock.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期98-109,122,共13页 Nankai Business Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71372099 71502120)资助
关键词 自我建构 脱销诱因 处理流畅性 相似品 可得产品 Self-construal Out-of-stock Inducement Processing Fluency Similar Alternative Available Product
  • 相关文献

参考文献71

  • 1Schary, P. B., Christopher, M.. The Anatomy of a Stock-out. Journal of Retailing, 1979, 55(2): 59-70.
  • 2Verbeke, W., Farris, P., Thurik, R.. Consumer Response to the Preferred Brand Out-of-Stock Situation. European Journal of Marketing, 1998, 32(11/12): 1008-1028.
  • 3Peckham, J. O.. The Consumer Speaks. Journal of Marketing, 1963, 27(4): 21-26.
  • 4Kim, M., Lennon, S. J.. Consumer Response to Online Apparel Stockouts. Psychology and Marketing, 2011, 28(2): 115-144.
  • 5李研,李东进,朴世桓.脱销信息对相似品购买延迟的影响——基于后悔理论的研究[J].营销科学学报(辑刊),2013,7(4):44-60. 被引量:12
  • 6Ku, H. H., Kuo, C. C., Fang, W. L., Yu, Y. W.. The Impact of Retail Out-of-Stock Options on Preferences: The Role of Consumers' Desire for Assimilation Versus Differentiation. Marketing Letters, 2014, 25(1): 53-66.
  • 7Ge, X., Messinger, P. R., Li, J.. Influence of Soldout Products on Consumer Choice. Journal of Retailing, 2009, 85(3): 274-287.
  • 8Min, K. S.. Consumer Response to Product Unavailability. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation. The Ohio State University, 2003.
  • 9Kwon, O., Sung, Y.. The Interplay of Self-construal and Regulatory Focus on Consumer Evaluation of Online Product Reviews. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference American Academy of Advertising, Lee W. N., Minneapolis, M. N. American Academy of Advertising.
  • 10Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. E, Payne, J. W.. Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 1998, 25(3): 187-217.

二级参考文献141

  • 1李纾.确定、不确定及风险状态下选择反转:“齐当别”选择方式的解释(英文)[J].心理学报,2005,37(4):427-433. 被引量:24
  • 2Hedgcock, W., Rao, A.. Trade-off Aversion as an Explanation for the Attraction Effect: A Functional Magnetic Resonance im- aging Study. Journal of Marketing Research, 2009, 46(1): 1-13.
  • 3Ha, Y. W., Park, S. Ahn, H. K.. When the Attraction Effect Dis- appears: The Differential Impact of Adding Common Versus Unique Features on Consumer Choice. Advances in Consumer Research, 2004, 31: 37-38.
  • 4Ha, Y. W., Park, S. Ahn, H. K.. The Influence of Categorical Attributes on Choice Context Effects. Journal of Consumer Re- search, 2009, 36(3): 463-477.
  • 5Mourali, M., Bockenholt, U. Laroche, M.. Compromise and At- traction Effects under Prevention and Promotion Motivations. Journal of Consumer Research, 2007, 34(2): 234-247.
  • 6Khan, U. Zhu, M. Kalra, A. When Tradeoffs Matter: The Effect of Choice. Construal on Context Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 2001, 48(1): 62-71.
  • 7Huber, J., Puto, C.. Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Il- lustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects. Journal of Con- sumer Research, 1983, 10(1): 31-44.
  • 8Pettibone, J. Wedell, D.. Examining Models of Nondominated Decoy Effects across Judgment and Choice. Organizational Be- havior and Human Decision Processes, 2000, 63(2): 300-328.
  • 9Ratneshwar, S., Shocker, A. D. Stewart, D. W.. Toward Under- standing the Attraction Effect: The Implications of Product Stimulus Meaningfulness and Familiarity. Journal of Consum- er Research, 1987, 13(4): 520-533.
  • 10Malaviya, P. Sivakumar, K.. The Influence of Choice Justifica- tion and Stimulus Meaningfulness on the Attraction Effect. Journal of Marketing Theory, 2002, 10(4): 20-29.

共引文献83

同被引文献188

引证文献22

二级引证文献143

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部