期刊文献+

SOX与XELOX对中国人进展期胃癌化疗效果的Meta分析 被引量:1

Chemotherapy Effects of SOX and XELOX in Chinese Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer:A Meta- analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究SOX方案和XELOX方案在中国人群中晚期胃癌化疗的疗效。方法检索PubMed、EmBase、Science Citation Index Expanded、Cochrane Library、Clinical Trials、中国知网数据库、万方数据库、维普数据库和中国临床试验注册网等发表的含有SOX方案和XELOX方案对比治疗中晚期胃癌的随机对照试验(RCT),并用RevMan软件进行Meta分析。结果纳入15篇RCT文献,共计1441位中晚期胃癌患者,两种化疔方案对疾病进展控制情况无明显差异,而SOX方案化疗后的恶心呕吐(RR=0.83,95%C10.70~0.98,I2=0%,P=0.03)和手足综合症(RR=0.67,95%CI 0.53~0.85,I2=42%,P=0.0007)发生率明显低于XE—LOX组。结论从化疗后副反应发生情况的角度来看,SOX方案优于XELOX方案。 Objective To evaluate chemotherapy effects of SOX and XELOX in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods PubMed, EmBase, Science Citation Index Expanded, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP and Chinese clinical trial registration website were searched for RCTs of SOX and XELOX on advanced gastric cancer. Revman software was used to perform a meta - analysis. Results 15 articles were included containing 1 441 advanced gastric cancer patients. There were no significant differences on treatment outcomes between the two chemotherapy regimens. However,the morbidities of nausea and vomiting( RR = 0.83,95% CI 0.70 - 0.98 ,I2 =0% ,P =0.03)as well as hand -foot syndrome(RR =0.67,95% CI 0.53 -0.85 ,Iz =42% ,P =0. 0007) after the treatment of SOX were lower than those with XELOX. Conclusion SOX may be better than XELOX in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer considering side effects.
出处 《医学新知》 CAS 2016年第3期180-186,共7页 New Medicine
关键词 进展期胃癌 SOX方案 XELOX方案 META分析 Advanced gastric cancer SOX XELOX Mcta - analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献91

  • 1郭颖英,方伟虹,谢淑萍.替吉奥联合奥沙利铂治疗进展期胃癌疗效观察[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2010,34(5):783-783. 被引量:22
  • 2金懋林.进展期胃癌全身化学治疗研究新进展[J].癌症进展,2007,5(1):18-24. 被引量:82
  • 3Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. CTCAE v3.0 : development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment [ J]. Semin Radiat Oncol,2003 ; 13 ( 3 ) : 176-81.
  • 4Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S, et al. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil,in advanced gastric cancer [ J ]. Oneology,2000 ;58 (3) :191-7.
  • 5Jin ML,Lu HS,Li J,et al. Randomized 3-armed phase III study of S-1 monotherapy versus S-1/CDDP ( SP ) versus 5-FU/CDDP ( FP ) in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer ( AGC ) : SC -101 study [ J ]. Proc ASCO ,2008 ;26:221.
  • 6Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T,et al. S-1 plus cisplatin alone versus S-1 alone for first line treatment of advanced gastric cancer ( SPIRITS trial : a Phase Ⅲ tiral ) [ J ]. Lancet Oncol,2008 ; 9:215.
  • 7Kang Y,Kang WK,Shin DB,et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of capecitabine / cisplatin vs continuous infusion of 5-FU / cisplatin as first line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer:efficacy and safety results[J]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2006;24:183.
  • 8Tanabe K,Suzuki T,Tokumoto N,et al.Combination therapy with do-cetaxel and S-1 as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced or re-current gastric cancer:a retrospective analysis[J].World J Surg Oncol,2010;8(5):40.
  • 9Ajani JA,Rodriquez W,Bodoky G,et al.Multicenter phaseⅢcompari-son of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advancedgastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study:the FLAGS trial[J].JClin Oncol,2010;28(9):1547-53.
  • 10Okines A,Chau I,Cunningham D.Capecitabine in advanced gastric canc-er[J].Expert Opin Pharmacother,2007;8(16):2851-61.

共引文献150

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部