摘要
[目的 /意义]在对MNCS和百分位数两种指标机制进行阐述、对比和分析的基础上,对百分位数指标的计算框架进行改进,提出一种动态权重的百分位数指标用于学术影响力的评价。[方法 /过程]以ESI学科为评价对象,分别选取同一研究实体下的不同学科和不同研究实体下的同一学科作为两个实例进行实证研究。[结果/结论]实证结果表明这种动态权重的百分位数指标与MNCS和百分位数指标相比更能展现评价对象学术影响力的细节。
[ Purpose/significance ] Based on the elaboration, comparison and analysis of the mechanism of the two indicators between MNCS and percentile rank score, the calculation framework of the percentile rank score is improved, and a dynamic - weight percentile rank score indicators for the evaluation of academic influence is put forward. [ Method/ process]Taking the ESI disciplines as evaluation object,the evaluation of different disciplines of one research entity and same discipline of different research entities are selected as two examples for empirical research. [ Result/conclusion] The empirical result shows that the dynamic weight of the percentile indicator can better show the details of the academic influence of the research entities than the MNCS and percentile rank score indicators.
出处
《图书情报工作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第11期93-99,共7页
Library and Information Service
基金
四川大学2016年青年教师科研启动基金项目"学科标准化的科研评估指标体系构建及实证研究"(项目编号:2016SCU11059)研究成果之一