期刊文献+

Spl对肠三叶因子启动子基础转录活性的影响 被引量:1

Effects of Spl on the basic transcriptional activity of intestinal trefoil factor promoter
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的寻找维持肠三叶因子(ITF)启动子基础转录活性的反应元件。方法以ITF启动子序列为模板,采用PCR方法获取不同长度及突变的ITF基因5’侧翼序列,插入pGL3-basle质粒,构建截短及突变荧光报告载体,进行以下实验。(1)按照随机数字表法(分组方法下同)将人胚胎肾293(HEK293)细胞分为pGL3-basic组、pGL3—300组、pGL3-280组、pGL3—260组、pGL3-240组、pGL3—220组、pGL3—200组,每组3孔,分别转染对应的质粒500ng及15ng海肾荧光素酶报告质粒pRL—TK,培养48h,单管型多功能检测仪检测细胞荧光素酶相对活性。(2)另取HEK293细胞,分为pGL3-basic组、pCL3—300组及突变体1、2、3、4组,每组3孔,分别转染pGL3-basic、pGL3—300及突变体1、2、3、4质粒500ng及15ngpRL—TK质粒。培养48h,同(1)检测荧光素酶相对活性。(3)另取HEK293细胞,分为空白对照组及10、50μmol/L光神霉素组,每组3孔,转染500ngpGL3—300质粒及15ngpRL·TK质粒后,空白对照组不加,后2组分别加10、50μmol/L光神霉素,培养24h,同(1)检测荧光素酶相对活性。(4)另取HEK293细胞,分为空白对照组及0.1、0.2、0.3μgpeDNA3.1-Spl组,每组3孔,转染500ngpGL3-300质粒及15ngpRL—TK质粒后,空白对照组不转染,后3组分别转染0.1、0.2、0.3μgpcDNA3.1-Spl质粒。培养48h,同(1)检测荧光素酶相对活性。对数据行单因素方差分析、LSD检验。结果(1)pGL3-basic组、pGL3-300组、pGL3.280组、pGL3—260组、pCL3-240组、pGL3—220组、pGL3—200组细胞荧光素酶相对活性分别为1.00、7.99±0.51、2.03±0.55、2.50±0.40、2.50±0.15、1.72±0.19、2.10±0.21,pGL3—280组、pGL3—260组、pGL3—240组、pGL3—220组、pGL3—200组细胞荧光素酶相对活性较pGL3—300组显著下降(P值均小于O.01)。(2)pGL3-basic组、pGL3.300组及突变体1、2、3、4组细胞荧光素酶相对活性分别为1.00、7.99±0.51、2.10±0.56、7.03±1.05、5.09±1.40、8.15±1.48,其中突变体1组细胞荧光素酶相对活性较pGL3—300组显著下降(P〈0.01),突变体2、3、4组细胞荧光素酶相对活性与pGL3—300组相近(P值均大于0.05)。(3)10、50Ixmol/L光神霉素组细胞荧光素酶相对活性分别为3.07±0.60、2.93±0.55,均显著低于空白对照组的8.05±0.83(P值均小于0.01)。(4)0.1、0.2、0.3IxgpeDNA3.1-Spl组细胞荧光素酶相对活性分别为12.74±1.12、14.52±1.25、15.66±1.82,均显著高于空白对照组的8.13±0.71(P值均小于0.05)。结论ITF启动子的-301~-293bp区域存在-个Spl反应元件,是维持ITF启动子基础转录活性的核心元件。 Objective To explore response element that maintains basic transcriptional activity of intestinal trefoil factor ([TF) promoter. Methods Truncated and mutant 5' flanking sequences of ITF gone were cloned from ITF promoter sequences by PCR, and then they were inserted into the pGL3-hasic vector to construct truncated and mutant luciferase vectors to conduct the following experiments. ( 1 ) Human embryonic kidney 293 ( HEK293 ) cells were divided into nGL3-hasie , pGL3-300 group, pGL3-280group, pGL3-260 group, pGL3-240 group, pGL3-220 group, and pGL3-200 group according to the random number table (the same grouping method below) , with 3 wells in each group, and they were respectively transfeeted with 500 ng corresponding plasmids and 15 ng renilla luciferase reporter plasmids pRL-TK. After being cultured for 48 hours, the relative luciferase activity of cells was measured by single tube detection sys- tem. (2) Another batch of HEK293 cells were divided into pGL3-basic group, pGL3-300 group, mutant 1 , 2, 3, and 4 groups, with 3 wells in each group, and they were respectively transfected with 500 ng pGL3-basie, pGL3-300, mutant 1 , 2, 3, and 4 plasmids and 15 ng pRL-TK plasmids. After being cultured for 48 hours, the relative lueiferase activity of cells was measured as in ( 1 ). (3) Another batch of HEK293 cells were divided into blank control group and 10, 50 μmol/L mithramycin groups, with 3 wells in each group. After being transfected with 500 ng pGL3-300 plasmids and 15 ng pRL-TK plasmids, cells in blank control group were not transfeeted with mithramycin, while cells in the latter two groups were respectively transfectcd with 10 and 50 μmol/L mithramycin. After being cultured for 24 hours, the relative lueiferase activity of cells was measured as in (1). (4) Another batch of HEK293 cells were divided into blank con- trol group and 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 μg pcDNA3.1-Spl groups, with 3 wells in each group. After being trans- fected with 500 ng pGL3-300 plasmids and 15 ng pRL-TK plasmids, cells in blank control group were not transfected with pcDNA3.1-Spl plasmids, while cells in the latter three groups were respectively transfected with 0.1 , 0.2, and 0.3 μg pcDNA3.1-Spl plasmids. After being cultured for 48 hours, the relative lueifer- ase activity of cells was measured as in ( 1 ). Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance and LSD test. Results (1) The relative luciferase activity of cells in pGL3-basic group, pGL3-300 group, pGL3-280 group, pGL3-260 group, pGL3-240 group, pGL3-220 group, and pGL3-200 group was 1.00, 7.99 ±0.51, 2.03 ±0.55, 2.50 ±0.40, 2.50 ±0. 15, 1.72 ± 0.19 and 2.10 ±0.21, respectively. The relative luciferase activity of cells in pGL3-280 group, pGL3-260 group, pGL3-240 group, pGL3-220 group, and pGL3-200 group was significantly lower than that in pGL3-300 group (with P values below 0.01 ). (2) The relative luciferase activity of cells in pGL3-basic group, pGL3-300 group, mutant 1 , 2, 3, and 4 groups was 1.00, 7.99 +0.51, 2.10±0.56, 7.03 ±1.05, 5.09 ±1.40 and 8.15 +1.48, respectively. The rela- tive luciferase activity of cells in mutant 1 group was significantly lower than that in pGL3-300 group ( P 〈 0. 01 ). The relative luciferase activity of cells in pGL3-300 group, mutant 2, 3, and 4 groups was similar ( with P values above 0.05). (3) The relative lueiferase activity of cells in 10 and 50 μmol/L mithramycin groups was respectively 3.07 ± 0.60 and 2.93 ±0.55, which was significantly lower than that in blank con- trol group (8.05 ±0.83, with P values below 0.01 ). (4) The relative luciferase activity of cells in 0. 1, 0.2, and 0.3 g pcDNA3.1-Spl groups was respectively 12.74 ± 1.12, 14.52 ± 1.25, and 15.66 ± 1.82, which was significantly higher than that in blank control group ( 8.13 ± 0.71 , with P values below 0.05 ). Conclusions One Spl binding site, locating in the region from -301 to -293 bp of ITF promoter, is the core element for regulating the basic transcriptional activity of ITF.
出处 《中华烧伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期413-417,共5页 Chinese Journal of Burns
基金 国家自然科学基金(81100252) 江苏省自然科学基金(BK20151150)
关键词 转录启动子 肠三叶因子 SP1 基础转录活性 Transcription initiation site Intestinal trefoil factor Spl Basic transcripitonalactivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Zhan Y, Chen PJ, Sadler WD, et al. Gut microbiota protects a- gainst gastrointestinal tumorigenesis caused by epithelial injury [J]. CancerRes, 2013, 73(24) :7199-7210.
  • 2Sun Z, Liu H, Yang Z, et al. Intestinal trefoil factor activates the PI3 K/Akt signaling pathway to protect gastric mucosal epithelium from damage[J]. Int J Oncol, 2014, 45(3) :1123-1132.
  • 3Sun Y, Zhu Y, Wang L, et al. Recombinant adenovirus-media- ted intestinal trefoil factor gene therapy for burn-induced intestinal mucosal injury[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(4) :e62429.
  • 4Barrera GJ, Sanchez G, Gonzalez JE. Trefoil factor 3 isolated from human breast milk downregulates cytokines ( IL8 and IL6) and promotes human beta defensin (hBD2 and hBD4) expression in intestinal epithelial ceils HT-29 [ J]. Bosn J Basic Med Sci, 2012, 12(4) :256-264.
  • 5孙勇,王良喜,毛学飞,邓向东,潘晓峰,吴杭庆,张方.基因重组人三叶因子3治疗烧伤小鼠肠黏膜损伤的实验研究[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2014,52(2):25-28. 被引量:2
  • 6Riafio A, Ortiz-Masia D, Vel6zquez M, et al. Nitric oxide in- duces HIF-I α stabilization and expression of intestinal trefoil fac- tor in the damaged rat jejunum and modulates ulcer healing[ J]. J Gastroenterol, 2011, 46 ( 5 ) : 565-576.
  • 7Wills-Karp M, Rani R, Dienger K, et al. Trefoil factor 2 rapidly induces interleukin 33 to promote type 2 immunity during allergic asthma and hookworm infection [ J ]. J Exp Med, 2012, 209 (3) : 607-622.
  • 8孙勇,勒娟,潘晓峰,张方.肠三叶因子启动子荧光素酶报告基因载体的构建及活性分析[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2015,36(5):823-826. 被引量:2
  • 9Devanand P, Kim SI, Choi YW, et al. Inhibition of bladder cancer invasion by Spl-mediated BTG2 expression via inhibition of DNA methyhransferase 1 [ J]. FEBS J, 2014, 281 (24) :5581- 5601.
  • 10Gaur P, Prasad S. Alterations in the Spl binding and Fmr-1 gene expression in the cortex of the brain during maturation and aging of mouse[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2014, 41(10):6855-6863.

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘向勇,沈煜,郭亭,鲍晓明.rDNA介导的多拷贝整合表达载体的构建及其在酿酒酵母工业菌株中的应用[J].山东大学学报(理学版),2005,40(3):105-109. 被引量:20
  • 2孙勇,彭曦,张勇,吕尚军,汪仕良.hITF毕赤酵母表达载体的构建及分泌表达[J].第三军医大学学报,2006,28(6):527-530. 被引量:12
  • 3吕尚军,张勇,孙勇,吴炜,尤忠义,汪仕良,彭曦.甘氨酰谷氨酰胺二肽对烧伤大鼠心功能的保护作用[J].中华烧伤杂志,2007,23(4):244-248. 被引量:9
  • 4Xue L, Aihara E, Podolsky D K, et al. In vivo action of trefoil factor 2 ( TFF2 ) to speed gastric repair is independ- ent of cyclooxygenase EJ]- Gut, 2010, 59 (9) : 1184- ll91.
  • 5Sun Y, Zhang S, Peng X, et al. Preparation, character- ization and transfection efficacy of chitosan nanoparticles containing the intestinal trefoil factor gene E J ]. Mol Biol Rep, 2012, 39(2):945-952.
  • 6Babyatsky M W, deBeaumont M, Thim L, et al. Oral trefoil peptides protect against ethanol- and indomethacin-induced gastric injury in rats E J ]- Gastroenterology, 1996, 110(2) :489-497.
  • 7Byrd J C, Bresalier R S. Mucins and mucin binding pro- teins in colorectal cancer [ J ]. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2004, 23 (1-2) : 77-99.
  • 8Dtirer U, Hartig R, Bang S, et al. TFF3 and EGF in- duce different migration patterns of intestinal epithelial cells in vitro and trigger increased internalization of E- cadherin E J ]. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2007, 20 ( 5 ) : 329- 346.
  • 9Lee J A, Jeong H J, Park H J, et al. Acupuncture accel- erates wound healing in burn-injured mice I J ]- Bums, 2011, 37(1) :117-125.
  • 10Lin N,Xu LF,Sun M.The protective effect of trefoil factor 3on the intestinal tight junction barrier is mediated by toll-like receptor 2via a PI3K/Akt dependent mechanism[J].Biochem Biophys Res Commun,2013,440(1):143-149.

共引文献2

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部