期刊文献+

AFP-L3与GP73在原发性肝癌中的诊断价值 被引量:8

Role of AFP-L3 and GP73 in diagnosis of primary hepatic carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清肿瘤标志物甲胎蛋白异质体(AFP-L3)和高尔基体蛋白73(GP73)单独和联合检测在原发性肝癌(PHC)诊断中的临床意义。方法采用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)进行检测180例患者(80例PHC患者、50例肝硬化患者和50例健康体检者)血清中AFP-L3和GP73的浓度,并比较各组水平差异,运用受试者工作曲线(recover operation characteristic,ROC)确定AFP-L3和GP73浓度诊断PHC的最佳临界值,分析评价AFP-L3和GP73单独检测及2种方法联合检测在PHC中的诊断价值。结果 PHC患者、肝硬化患者、正常对照组的血清AFP-L3浓度分别为(65.234±21.315)ng/ml、(18.614±20.655)ng/ml、(13.209±14.560)ng/ml,PHC组AFPL3水平显著高于肝硬化组及正常组(P<0.001);肝硬化组与正常组的AFP-L3水平比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.134)。通过血清中AFP-L3水平绘制诊断PHC的ROC曲线,AFP-L3诊断PHC的最佳临界值:≥36.076 ng/ml,其诊断敏感性和特异性分别为75.00%、94.00%。PHC组患者、肝硬化组患者、正常对照组的血清GP73浓度分别为(0.431±0.180)IU/ml、(0.228±0.047)IU/ml、(0.213±0.034)IU/ml,PHC组GP73水平明显高于肝硬化组及正常组(P<0.001);而GP73水平在肝硬化组与正常组比较中差异无统计学意义(P=0.069)。通过血清GP73水平绘制诊断PHC的ROC曲线,GP73诊断PHC的最佳临界值:≥0.298 IU/ml,其诊断敏感性和特异性分别为80.00%和96.00%;联合检测AFP-L3和GP7诊断PHC的敏感性为92.50%,特异性为90.00%。结论AFP-L3和GP73是诊断PHC良好的血清肿瘤标志物,均有较高特异性,但敏感度不理想。AFP-L3与GP73联合检测,可提高PHC诊断的敏感性和特异性,对PHC的早期诊断具有积极的意义。 Objective To explore the clinical significance of serum tumor maker lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive et-feto- protein( AFP-L3 ) and Golgi protein-73 (GP73) single or combined detection in the diagnosis of primary hepatic carcino- ma(PHC). Methods The serum levels of AFP-L3 and GP73 in 80 patients with PHC, in 50 patients with cirrhosis of liver and in 50 healthy cases was detected by the enzyme-link immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and were compared among difference groups, and the clinical diagnosis value of AFP-L3 and GP73 in PHC was evaluated. Results The levels of serum AFP-L3 in patients with PHC, cirrhosis and healthy group : (65. 234± 21. 315)ng/ml, (18. 614 ± 20.655)ng/ml and ( 13. 209 ± 14.560)ng/ml, respectively. The serum AFP-L3 in patients with PHC were higher than that in the cirrhosis of liver group and in the healthy cases group(P 〈 0. 001 ). Taking AFP-L3 level≥ 36. 076 ng/ml as diagnostic criteria, the sensitivity of AFP-L3 level in PHC diagnosis was 75.00% and the specificity was 94.00%. The levels of serum GP73 in the patients with PHC, patients with cirrhosis of liver and healthy group were (0.431 ± 0.180)IU/ml, (0. 228 ± 0. 047) IU/ml and (0. 213 ± 0. 034)IU/ml,respectively. The serum GP73 in patients with PHC were higher than that in the cir- rhosis of liver group and in the healthy cases group(P 〈 0. 001 ). Taking GP73 level≥0. 298 IU/ml as diagnostic criteria, the sensitivity of GP73 level in PHC diagnosis was 80.00%, the specificity of GP73 level in PHC diagnosis of GP73 level in PHC diagnosis was 96.00%. The combination of AFP-L3 and GP73 was sensitivity of 92.50% and specificity of 90.00%. Conclusion AFP-L3 and GP73 were very effective serum tumor maker in the clinical diagnosis of the PHC. AFP-L3 and GP73 have a higher specificity. AFP-L3 and GP73 combined detection could increase the sensitivity in the PHC clinical diagnosis. AFP-L3 and GP73 combined detection of PHC is useful.
出处 《中华全科医学》 2016年第9期1477-1479,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
关键词 原发性肝癌 甲胎蛋白异质体 高尔基蛋白73 Primary hepatic carcinoma α-fetoprotein -L3 Golgi protein-73
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Hu B,Tian X, Sun J, et al. Evaluation of individual and combined ap- plications of serum biomarkers for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcino- ma:a meta-analysis[ J]. Int J Mol Sci,2013,14(12) :23559-23580.
  • 2Moriya S, Morimoto M, Numata K, et al. Fucosylated Fraction of Alpha- fetoprotein as a Serological Marker of Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma [ J]. Antieancer Res,2013,33 (3) :1013-1321.
  • 3Subwongcharoen S, Leelawat K, Treepongkaruna SA, et al. Serum AFP and AFP-L3 in clinically distinguished hepatocellnlar carcinoma from patients with liver masses [ J ]. J Med Assoc Thai,2011,94 (Suppl 2 ) : $46-$51.
  • 4王晓蕊,黄彩云,韩素桂,张景华,李世龙,周秀艳.原发性肝癌患者血清中AFP-L3、GP73检测的评价[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2012,19(6):330-333. 被引量:11
  • 5Gao G,Dong F,Xu X,et al. Diagnostic value of serum Golgi protein 73 for HBV-related primary hepatic carcinoma[ J~. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2015,8(9) :11379-85.
  • 6Liang R, Chen XY, Ge LY, et al. Meta-analysis supports the diagnostic value of GP73 in primary liver cancer[ J~. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroen- terol,2015,39 (5) :e71-72.
  • 7科技部十二五重大专项联合课题组专家.乙型肝炎病毒相关肝硬化的临床诊断、评估和抗病毒治疗的综合管理[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2014,30(2):99-108. 被引量:51
  • 8常彬霞,孙颖,滕光菊,张伟,赵军,邹正升,李保森.2012年欧洲肝病学会及2010年美国肝病学会关于酒精性肝病指南的解读[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2015,31(1):30-34. 被引量:16
  • 9张琼月,陈俊辉.肿瘤标志物在早期肝癌诊断中的价值[J].医学综述,2016,22(1):76-79. 被引量:18
  • 10Sangro B, Carpanese L, Cianni R, et al. Survival after yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across Bar- celona clinic liver cancer stages : a European evaluation[J]. Hepatol- ogy,2011,54(3) :868-878.

二级参考文献82

共引文献107

同被引文献75

引证文献8

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部