胚胎基因设计的伦理问题研究被引量：1

Study on the Ethical Problems of Embryonic Genetic Designing

下载PDF

导出

摘要 CRISPR/Cas9技术是近年来备受瞩目的一项新兴基因编辑技术,对胚胎基因设计的伦理问题展开讨论,反对胚胎基因设计的论证包括:应当禁止父母决定子女未来、应当禁止将子女产品化、应当顺其自然、应当禁止助长歧视、应当禁止不公平分配、应当禁止浪费资源;支持胚胎基因编辑的论证包括:不应当限制人的自由、不应当禁止父母增加子女的幸福、不应当禁止不能禁止的行为等。在当前的时空范围内,"应当禁止胚胎基因设计极可能是正确的道德判断",但随着大部分人"应对"世界方式的变化,该道德判断的正确性也极可能发生变化。 With CRISPR/Cas9 emerging as one of the most promising new gene editing techniques, this paper carried out a philosophical study on the ethical problems on embryonic genetic designing. The arguments against embryonic genetic designing included： we should prohibit parents determining the future of offspring, we should prohibit commercialization of our offspring, we should let everything take its natural course, we should prohibit fostering discrimination, we should prohibit unfair distribution, we should prohibit waste resources, etc.. The arguments for embryonic genetic designing included： we should not limit freedom of human being, we should not prohibit parents augment happiness of offspring, we should not prohibit behaviors unable to prohibit, etc.. In conclusion, this paper suggested that with the present limits of time and space, ＂embryonic genetic designing should be prohibited＂ is very likely to be the right moral judgment. However, if most people change their way of ＂coping ＂ with the world in the future, this moral judgment would stop being right.

作者李建会张鑫

机构地区北京师范大学哲学学院

出处《医学与哲学（A）》北大核心 2016年第7期8-13,共6页 Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition

基金 2014年度国家社会科学基金重大项目项目编号:14ZDB171

关键词 CRISPR/Cas9技术基因增强胚胎基因设计生命伦理 CRISPR/Cas9, gene enhancement, embryonic genetic designing, bioethics

分类号 R-052 [医药卫生]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1BUCHANAN A,BROCK D W,DANIELS N,et al. From chance to choice:Genetics and justice[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2000 : 1.
2JUENGST E T. What does enhancement mean? [M]// PARENS E. Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 1998 : 29- 46.
3PARENS E. Is better always good?[M]//Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 1998 : 1 - 28.
4SANDEL M. The case against perfection[J]. The Atlantic Monthly, 2004,293(3) :51-62.
5DAVIS D S. Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future [J]. Hastings Cent Rep, 1997,27(2) : 7- 15.
6FEINBERG J. The child's right to an open future[M]//AIKEN W, LAFOLLETTE H. Whose child? : Parental rights, parental authority and state power. Totowa :Rowman and Littlefield, 1980 : 124 -153.
7MURRAY T H. Enhancement[M]// STEINBOCK B. The Oxford handbook of biocthics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007: 491- 515.
8President's Council on Bioethies. Beyond therapy:biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness[M]. New York: Harper Perennial ,2003:1.
9LITTLE M O. Cosmetic surgery,suspect nornxs and the ethics of complicity [M]//PARENS E. Enhancing human traits:Ethical and acial implications. Washington El2: Georgetown University Press, 1998 : 162 - 175.
10SAVULESCU J. Genetic interventions and the ethics of enhancement of human beings[M]// STEINBOCK B. The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York : Oxford University Press, 2007 : 516 - 535.