期刊文献+

贝前列素钠片及缬沙坦联合治疗老年下肢动脉狭窄的临床观察 被引量:5

Efficacy of combination of Beraprost Sodium Tablets and Valsartan in the treatment of elderly patients with hypertension and diabetes with arteriosclerosis obliterans(ASO)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨联合口服贝前列素钠片及缬沙坦治疗高血压合并糖尿病下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的疗效及安全性,探索出能够长期治疗下肢动脉狭窄的临床方法。方法 选取2012年3月~2014年8月在我院干诊及内分泌科住院的、确诊老年高血压合并糖尿病下肢动脉狭窄患者51例,经过联合口服贝前列素钠片及缬沙坦治疗1年,观察治疗前后患者的血压、最远走行距离、下肢动脉血管内径、血流峰时速度。结果 治疗后1年较治疗前患者血压达标(P〈0.01),最远走行距离显著延长,治疗前为(57.9±9.6)m,治疗后为(683.4±20.7)m,差异有统计学意(P〈0.05)。治疗后较治疗前下肢主要动脉血管内径增宽及对应血流速度增快,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论对于老年高血压合并糖尿病下肢动脉狭窄患者,联合口服贝前列素钠片及缬沙坦治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症是一种临床上安全有效的方法。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of combined therapy of Beraprost Sodium Tablets and Val- sartan in the treatment of arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) in patients with hypertension and diabetes,and find the ef- fective method to ASO. Methods 51 patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus in March 2012-August 2014 in our hospital,were diagnosed as ASO. After the combined administration of Beraprost Sodium Tablets and Valsartan for 1 year, observing the blood pressure,the walk distance without causing pain,lower extremity arterial blood vessel di- ameter,blood flow peak velocity before and after treatment. Results There was significant difference of blood pressure before and 1 year after treatment. The walk distance without eausing pain after the treatment was significantly longer than before[(57.9±9.6)m vs (683.4±20.7)m],and there was statistieal significant difference(P〈0.05). Before and after treatment,there were statistically signifieant difference of the main artery diameter and blood flow velocity (P〈0.05). Conclusion For elderly ASO patients with hypertension and diabetes,the combined therapy with Beraprost Sodium Tablets and Valsartan is a safe and effeetive method in elinieal praetice.
作者 刘岩 董茜妍
出处 《中国现代医生》 2016年第15期81-83,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 糖尿病 高血压 下肢动脉狭窄 贝前列素钠片 缬沙坦 下肢动脉彩超 Diabetes Hypertension Arterioselerosis obliterans (ASO) Beraprost sodium tablets Valsartan Artery col- or doppler uhrasonography
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献43

  • 1冯琨,谭静范,陈影,杜馥曼,杨玉芝.疏血通注射液治疗糖尿病下肢动脉硬化闭塞症临床观察[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2009,29(3):255-257. 被引量:32
  • 2薛百忠,佟盟,任立,单学智,蔡培烈,陈大为.新型药物载体“脂质乳剂”的药剂学定义辨析及其意义[J].中国药剂学杂志(网络版),2009(3):198-204. 被引量:3
  • 3陈琳,匡希斌.异构前列腺素与临床氧化应激性损伤疾病[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2005,13(5):667-669. 被引量:13
  • 4Karnabatidis D, Spiliopoulos S, Tsetis D, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous catheter-directed intra-arterial thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectom for acute lower-limb ischemia[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2011. [ Epub ahead of print ].
  • 5Dosluoglu HH, Harris LM. Endovascular management of subacute lower extremity ischemia [ J ]. Semin Vasc Surg, 2008, 21 ( 4 ) : 167-179.
  • 6Ouriel K, Shortell CK, DeWeese JA, et al. A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with operative revascularization in the initial treatment of acute peripheral arterial ischemia[ J]. J Vasc Surg, 1994, 19(6) : 1021-1030.
  • 7Ouriel K, Veith FJ, Sasahara AA. Thrombolysis or peripheral arterial surgery: phase I results. TOPAS Investigators[ J]. J Vasc Surg, 1996, 23 ( 1 ) : 64-73. discussion 74-75.
  • 8The STILE Investigators. Results of a prospective randomized trial evaluating surgery versus thrombolysis for ischemia of the lower ex- tremity. The STILE trial[J]. Ann Surg, 1994, 220(3) : 251-266.
  • 9discussion 266-268. Comerota A J, Gravett MH. Do randomized trials of thrombolysis versus open revascularization still apply to current management: what has changed[ J] .9 Semin Vasc Surg, 2009, 22( 1 ) : 41-46.
  • 10Rutherford RB. Clinical staging of acute limb ischemia as the basis for choice of revascularization method: when and how to intervene [J]. Semin Vasc Surg, 2009, 22(1) : 5-9.

共引文献4648

同被引文献40

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部