马克思《巴黎手稿》中劳动批判的三重视界及其逻辑演进

Triple Horizons and the Logical Evolution of Marx's Criticism of Labor in “Paris Manuscript”

马克思在笔记本I中发现了"私有财产"的社会历史意义,这意味着"异化劳动"视界不足以支撑起扬弃"私有财产"的现实或逻辑途径。但是,"谋生劳动"视界逻辑框架却仍旧没能超越笔记本I中"异化劳动"的价值批判范式。所以,在整个笔记本II和III的"世界历史"视界,马克思则通过对市民社会的黑格尔历史辩证法式考察,透视私有财产与人本身矛盾的现实发展历程。因为只有在"世界历史"视界中,私有财产与人的尖锐对立才是可以被逻辑地扬弃的。

Marx discovers social and historical significance of 'private property ' in Notebook I,which means that the horizon of 'estranged labor'is not enough to support the annulations of 'private property'in the real or logical way. However,the logical framework of the horizon of 'labor to earn a living'has still not been able to go beyond the value-criticism paradigm of'estranged labor'in Notebook I. Therefore,on the 'world-historical'horizon of the entire notebook II and III,Marx studies the civil society through Hegel's historical dialectics,in order to have a perspective view the development in the real course of the contradictory between the private property and human beings. Because only through the'world-historical'horizon,can the sharp opposition between the private property and human beings be logically annulled.