期刊文献+

美国AACSB卓越商科教育质量认证的特点与启示 被引量:19

Characteristics and Revelations of American AACSB Quality Accreditation to Advance Collegiate Business Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 参与商学院国际认证已成为国内商科教育追求卓越、增强国际竞争力的一种重要战略手段。本研究从认证程序、认证范围、认证标准等方面简要介绍了AACSB国际认证的基本框架,着重从关注组织使命的陈述、影响与创新,重视利益相关者对认证过程的全员参与,关注学生学习保障机制的构建等方面剖析了卓越商科教育质量认证的主要特点,并从推动本科层次"中国式"商学院认证体系建立、促进商学院内部质量文化共识形成、推进学习结果评价为抓手的长效质量保障机制构建等方面,为国内不同层次的商科教育尤其中外合作办学商科教育走向卓越提供参考价值。 Pursuing international accreditation for business school has been an important way of achieving better education quality and stronger international competitiveness in China. The study briefly introduces the basic framework of AACSB International(The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International) Accreditation, including the procedure, scope,standards and other aspects of the accreditation, and analyzes the main characteristics of advanced collegiate business education by focusing on organization mission, influences and innovation, full participation of stakeholders in the accreditation process and building education quality assurance mechanism. Meanwhile, the study aims to promote building an accreditation system for collegiate business schools with China's characteristics, strengthening the shared understanding of education quality and establishing a long-term quality assurance system for study achievement evaluation by providing references for business schools, especially Chinese-foreign cooperatively-run schools at difference levels in China to achieve higher education quality.
出处 《上海教育评估研究》 2016年第3期32-37,共6页 Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
关键词 商科教育 质量认证 AACSB 中外合作办学 Collegiate business education Quality accreditation AACSB Sino-foreign cooperatively-run education program
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1Mien Segers and Filip Dochy. Quality Assurance in Higher Education : Theoretical Consideration and Empirical Evidence [ J ]. Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 22, No,2. 1996. p116.
  • 2Doherty, G. D. (ed). Developing Quality Systems in Education [ M ]. Routeledge. 1994.
  • 3Craft,A(ed) ,International Development in Assuring Quality in Higher Education[ M]. Routeledge. The Falmer Press 1994.
  • 4彭森明.将学生学习成果纳入大学评鉴指标项目之必要性与可行性.评鉴(台湾),2008,(15).
  • 5OSCAR T LENNING. Assessment and Evaluation [ K ]//URSULA HANSON, et al. Student DELWORTH, GARY R Services: A Handbook for the Profession. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1980 : 233, 233,234,233-234.
  • 6VICTORIA NEUTELDT. Webster's New World Dictionary of American English(3rd College Edition) [K}. New York:Simon& Schuster,Inc. 1991:82.
  • 7JESS STEIN(Ed. ). The Random House Dictionary of the English Language [K]. New York.. Random House, 1966 : 90.
  • 8DONALD W MACKINNON. An Overview of Assessment Centers[Z]. N. C. : Center for Creative Leadership, 1975 : photocopy.
  • 9Higher Education Assessment Act of 1990,SECTION 66070-66072[EB/OL]. (2010-01-02). http://sun- site. berkeley, edu/uehistory/arehives_exhibits/master- plan/educ_codes, html.
  • 10TERRY W HARTLE. The Growing Interest in Measuring the Educational Achievement of College Students[C]//CLIFFORD ADELMAN. Assessment in American Higher Education: Issues and Contexts. Washington,DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement(U. S. Department of Education), 1985 : 2-3.

共引文献187

同被引文献79

引证文献19

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部