期刊文献+

网络借贷P2P:利差是否包含违约风险隐含信息?——来自人人贷交易数据的实证分析 被引量:5

Online P2P Lending: Does the Spread Contain Hidden Information about Default Risk?——An Empirical Study Based on Transaction Data from Renrendai. com
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于Probit和Tobit模型,以人人贷2011年1月1日至2015年9月30日交易数据为基础,研究网络借贷P2P利差即包含借款人与投资人之间不对称信息的利率部分是否隐含借款人的违约风险信息。研究发现,浮动区间型利率机制下,利差与借款人违约风险具有正向相关关系,利差越大,借款人违约概率越高,表明利差确实包含借款人违约风险隐含信息。进一步探究借款人愿意增加借款资金成本的原因发现,利差与借款人获得借款的急切程度相关,具体表现为利差与满标所需时间呈反向相关关系,即利差越大,满标所需时间越短。 Based on Probit and Tobit models, and by using transaction data from Janu- ary 1st 2011 to September 30th 2015 on Renrendai. corn, this paper tries to investigate whether the spread between the borrower and investors can reflect the default risk of the borrower on online P2P lending. The results show that there is a positive relationship be- tween the spread and default risk of the borrower in the floating mechanism of interest rate determining: The larger the spread, the higher the probability that the borrower defaults. This shows the spread does contain hidden information of borrower~ default risk. The paper does further research on the reason why borrowers are willing to increase the cost of borrow- ing money, finding spreads are relevant to the borrower~ degree of urgency to obtain the bor- rowing money. Specifically, the spread is inversely correlated with the time required for the completion of a list, which means the greater the spread, the shorter the time required for the completion of a list.
出处 《金融经济学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期27-37,共11页 Financial Economics Research
关键词 网络借贷P2P 利差 违约风险 online P2P lending spread defauh risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1Akerlof, G. A. , 1970, "The Market for ' Lemons' : Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism", Quaterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84,488--500.
  • 2Baehmann, A., A. Beeker, D. Buerckner, M. Hilker, M. Lehmann, and P. Tiburtius, 2011, "Online Peer-to-peer Lending-a Literature Review", Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, Vol. 16, 1--18.
  • 3Bagehot, W. , and J. Treynor, 1971, "The Only Game in Town", Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 27, 12--17.
  • 4Duarte, J. , S. Siegel, and L. Young, 2012, "Trust and Credit: the Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending", Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 25, 2455--2484.
  • 5Herzenstein, M. , S. Sonenshein, and U. M. Dholakia, 2011, "Tell Me a Good Story and I May Lend You My Money: The Role of Narratives in Peer-to-peer Lending Decisions", SSRN working paper.
  • 6Herzenstein, M. , R. Andrews, U. Dholakia, and E. Lyandres, 2008, " The Democratization of Personal Consumer Loans? Determinants of Success in Online Peer-to-peer Lending Communities", SSRN working paper.
  • 7Klafft, M. , 2008, "Peer to Peer Lending: Auctioning Microcredits Over the lnternet", SSRN working paper.
  • 8Kumar, S., 2007, " Bank of One: Empirical Analysis of Peer-to-peer Financial Marketplaces" Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems, 1--8.
  • 9Larrimoreet, L. , L. Jiang, J. Larrimore, D. Markowitz, and S. Gorski, 2011, "Peer to Peer Lending: the Relationship Between Language Features, Trustworthiness, and Persuasion Success", Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 39, 19--37.
  • 10Lin, M. , N. R. Prabhala, and S. Viswanathan, 2013, "Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Social Networks and Adverse Selection in Online Peer-to-peer Lending", Management Science, Vol. 59, 17--35.

共引文献332

同被引文献51

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部