期刊文献+

心包腔内注入凝血酶治疗经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围术期急性心脏压塞的疗效和体会(附13例) 被引量:6

Intra-pericardial thrombin injection for acute cardiac tamponade during percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并发冠状动脉穿孔致急性心脏压塞的临床特征、处理方法,以提高抢救成功率。方法 回顾性分析2005年1月至2015年12月在新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院心内科住院行PCI时并发冠状动脉穿孔导致急性心脏压塞的冠心病患者13例,分析发生原因、临床表现、处理方法及预后。结果 所有患者均得到及时诊断,心包穿刺均获得成功,心包腔内注入凝血酶冻干粉500~1000 U得到有效止血,术后2 h、4 h、6 h、24 h及出院前复查心脏超声未发现新的心包积液及心包粘连。所有患者出院后6个月随访心脏超声未见心包缩窄或粘连。结论 急性心脏压塞是PCI术中严重的并发症之一,一旦诊断明确,需紧急心包穿刺引流。心包腔内注入凝血酶能成功止血,提高抢救成功率。 Objective To explore the diagnosis and management of acute cardiac tamponade for coronary artery perforation during cardiac intervention. Methods This is a retrospective study looking into the cause, clinical presentations and the outcome of acute cardiac tamponade in 13 patients during PC! between 2005.01 to 2015.12. Results The diagnosis of intraoperative cardiac tamponade was made clinically with acute onset of symptoms and was confirmed by echocardiography and bloody drainage from acute pericardiocentesis. Tamponade was relieved in all 13 patients by urgent pericardiocentesis. Following the aspiration of all pericardial fluid, we injected 500 - 1000 units of thrombin into the pericardial cavity and intravenous injection of protamine for heparin reversal. All 13 patients were discharged without need of further surgical intervention. Echocardiographic follow-up up to 6 months after discharge did not show recurrence of pericardial effusion or pericardial constriction. Conclusions Acute cardiac tamponade is a serious complication in interventional cardiology. Once correctly recognized, emergency pericardiocentesis is an effective treatment and intra-pericardial thrombin injection can enhance hemostasis and clinical outcome.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2016年第6期326-329,共4页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
关键词 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 冠状动脉穿孔 心脏压塞 凝血酶 Percutaneous coronary intervention Coronary artery perforation Cardiac tamponade Thrombin
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Ellis SG, Ajluni S, Arnold AZ, et al. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation, 1994, 90 (6) : 2725- 2730.
  • 2ShimonyA, Joseph L, Mottillo S, et al. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol, 2011, 27 (6) :843-850.
  • 3Chua SK,Lee SH, Shyu KG, et al. Incidence, Management, and Clinical Outcomes of Procedure-Related Coronary Artery Perforation : Analysis of 13, 888 Coronary Angioplasty Procedures. Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2008, 24(2) :80-85.
  • 4Holmes DR Jr, Nishimura R, Fountain R, et al. Latrogenic pericardial effusion and tamponade in the percutaneous intracardiac intervention era. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2009, 2 (8) :705-717.
  • 5戴士鹏,徐泽升.冠状动脉穿孔所致的心包压塞[J].国际心血管病杂志,2015,42(1):26-28. 被引量:3
  • 6Hasan AG, Dolunay O, SerkanA, et al. Management of cardiac tamponade : a comperative study between echo-guided pericardiocentesis and surgery-a report of 100 patients. Cardiol Res Prac, 2011, 1978(38) :406-412.
  • 7Ioannis AS, Konstantinos K, Kirk NG. Delayed perforation after pereutaneous coronary intervention: rare and potentially lethal. Catheter Cardiovase Interv, 2014, 83 ( 1 ) :FA5-E50.
  • 8Wang X, Ge J. Balloon occlusion types in the treatment of eoronary perforation during pereutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiol Res Prae, 2014, 7840 ( 18 ) : 1155-1160.
  • 9Kumar R, Sinha A, Lin M J, et al. Complications of perieardioeentesis: A elinieal synopsis. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sei, 2015, 5(3) : 206-212.
  • 10Lee JK,Tsui KL, Chan KK, et al. Intra-perieardial thrombin injeetion for post-infaretion left ventrieular free wall rupture. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovase Care, 2012, 1 (4) :337-340.

二级参考文献22

  • 1Holmes DR Jr, Nishimura R, Fountain R, et al. Iatrogenic pericardial effusion and tamponade in the pereutaneous intraeardiac intervention era [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2009, 2(8): 705-717.
  • 2Kiernan TJ, Yan BP, Ruggiero N, et al. Coronary artery perforations in the contemporary interventional era [J].J Interv Cardiol, 2009, 22(4): 350-353.
  • 3Ioannis AS, Konstantinos K, Kirk NG. Delayed perforation after percutaneous coronary intervention: rare and potentially iethal[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2014, 83 (1): E45-E50.
  • 4Fukutomi T, Suzuki T, Popma J J, et al. Early and late clinical outcomes following coronary perforation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. Circ J, 2002, 66(4) : 349-356.
  • 5Fejka M, Dixon SR, Safian RD, et al. Diagnosis, management, and clinical outcome of cardiac tamponade complicating percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2002, 90(11): 1183-1186.
  • 6Gunning MG, Williatns IL, Jewitt DE, et al. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous intervention: incidence and outcome[J]. Heart, 2002, 88(5): 495-498.
  • 7AI-Lamee R, Ielasi A, Latib A, et al. Incidence, predictors, management, immediate and long term outcomes following grade Ⅲ coronary perforation[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2011, 4(1): 87-95.
  • 8Teis A, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Rodriguez Leor O, et al. Coronary artery perforation by intracoronary guide wires:risk factors and clinical outcomes[J]. Rev Esp Cardiol, 2010, 63(6) : 730-734.
  • 9Ozaki Y, Kitabata H, Akasaka T. Unusual case of coronary perforation which developed delayed cardiac tamponade due to collateral flow from contralateral coronary artery [J]. Cardiovase Interv Ther, 2012, 27(3) :205-209.
  • 10De Marco F, Baleells J, Leffivre T, et al. Delayed and recurrent cardiac tamponade following distal coronary perforation of hydrophilic guidewires during coronary intervention [J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2008, 20 ( 5 ) : E150-E153.

共引文献2

同被引文献78

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部