期刊文献+

规范内嵌后的争议:“保护的责任”与中德遵守情况比较

原文传递
导出
摘要 作为新型国际规范,"保护的责任"如何在主权—人权间取舍,以及怎样对国际社会的集体干预行动给予有效引导和约束,始终是各国普遍关注却反馈不一的焦点。本文借助伊丽莎白·阿瑟诺对国际规范扩散的思考,比较了中国和德国对"保护的责任"规范的遵守情况,进而证明了两个判断:其一,中德就是否在对外实践中遵守"保护的责任"争议不断,这意味着"内嵌"不是"规范扩散"的终点,而是从国际体系回落至主权国家层面后影响国家政策的开端;其二,"保护的责任"在语言表述方面的模糊化以及对中德既有文化的背离成为其陷入争论的重要原因,而"国家利益"砝码的重新引入能够有效助力决策。
作者 王聪悦
出处 《国外理论动态》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期55-69,共15页 Foreign Theoretical Trends
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Vaughn P. Shannon, "Norms Are What States Make of Them: The Political Psychology of Norm Violation", In- ternational Studies Quarterly, Vol. 44, 2000, pp. 293 - 316.
  • 2Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, "International Norms Dynamic and Political Change", International Or- ganization, 52 (4) , 1988 ,p. 892.
  • 3Friedrich Kratochwill, "The Force of Prescriptions", In- ternational Organization, 34 (4), 1984, p. 686.
  • 4Stephen D. Krasner, " Structural Causes and Regime Consequences : Regimes as Intervening Variables", Inter- national Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1982,p. 186.
  • 5Stephen D. Krasner, Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985, pp. 4 - 5.
  • 6Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkin, "Norm Dynamics and Political Change", International Organization, 1988, p. 901.
  • 7Alex J. Bellamy, Responsibility to Protect, Polity, 2009, p. 6.
  • 8Statement by Professor the Hon Gareth Evans at the The- matic Discussion in the UN General Assembly on "Ten Years of the Responsibility to Protect : From Commitmentto Implementation", the Global Centre for the Responsi- bility to Protect, 26 February 2016, p. 3.
  • 9Annika Bjorkdahl, " Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections", Cam- bridge Review of International Afflairs, Vol. 15, No. 1, p. 11.
  • 10John J. Mearsheimer, "The False Promise of Interna- tional Institutions" International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1994/95, p. 13.

二级参考文献69

  • 1翟隽.中国积极推动解决达尔富尔问题[J].求是,2007(11):61-63. 被引量:8
  • 2Doug Mataconis, "The 'Responsibility To Protect' Doctrine After Libya," Outside the Be#way, September 4, 2011. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/the-responsibility- to-protect-doetrine-after-libya/.
  • 3Anne-Marie Slaughter, "Was the Libyan Intervention Really an Intervention," The Atlantic, August 26, 2011. http://www.theatlantic.com/intemational/archive/20l 1/08/was-the- libyan-intervention-really-an-intervention/244175/.
  • 4Anne-Marie Slaughter, "How the World Could--and Maybe Should-Intervene in Syria," The Atlantic, January 23, 2012. http://www.theatlantic.eom/international/ archive/2012/01/how-the-world-could-and-maybe-should-intervene-in-syria/251776/.
  • 5David Hillstrom, "The Libyan No Fly Zone: Responsibility to Protect and International Law," Foreign Policy, March 21, 2011.
  • 6Gareth Evans, "Responsibility to protect: An idea whose time has come--and gone," The Economist, Jul 23rd 2009.
  • 7United Nations Informal Discussion on "Responsibility While Protecting," February 21, 2012. http ://www.un.inthgrazil/speech/Concept-Paper-%20RwP.pdf.
  • 8Charles Homans, "Responsibility to Protect: A Short History," Foreign Policy, November 2011.
  • 9Kishan S. Rana, Former Indian Ambassador, "Reconsidering R2P, post-Libya," Gateway House, December 6, 2011. http://www.gatewayhouse.in/publication/gateway-house/ features/reconsidering-r2p-post-libya.
  • 10“常驻联合国副代表刘振民大使在联大关于保护的责任问题全会上的发言”,2009年7月24日.httD://www.fmorc.Izov.cn/chn/19ds/widffzwbd/t575180.htm.

共引文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部