期刊文献+

南海仲裁案法律问题解析与对策研究

The Assessment about and the Response to the South China Sea Arbitration Viewed from the Perspective of International Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 南海仲裁案关乎我国南海诸岛及其海域的主权与主权权利,寻求法律应对,降低该案结果可能对国家合法权益的损害为目前研究的关键所在。针对南海九段线合法性,我国可通过国家实践丰富"历史性权利"的内涵与外延,适时表达南海九段线内水域"历史性权利"的法律确信并利用权威公法家学说的功能阻断对南海九段线性质的不利认定;针对岛礁法律地位,可增加部分岛礁的人类活动,通过常规巡航加强对南海岛礁的有效管辖,适时公布南沙群岛的领海基线;资源开发方面,以共赢为目标进行有序"共同开发";环境保护方面,积极引领以《南海各方行为宣言》为基础的南海环境合作机制,加快建立南海海洋保护区。我国有必要通过积极有效的法律应对,构建符合历史事实、顾及区域共同利益的南海法律秩序,维护国家海洋权益。 the South China Sea Arbitration is closely related to the sovereignty and sovereign rights of the Islands and waters in the South China Sea. The key task of the current research is to seek the legal response and reduce the possible damage to the legitimate rights and interests of the country. For the legitimacy of the nine-dash line of the South China Sea,China could clarify the context and meaning of"historic rights"through the practice of the state with the opinio juris. In addition,using the theory of the authority of the public law to supplement the explanation of the meaning of "historic rights". Concerning the status of the islands,it is necessary to increase the human activities on some islands and reefs,and cruise conventionally to strengthen effective jurisdiction over the islands in the South China Sea. In addition,the baseline of Spratly Island could be declared at appropriate time. So far as the resources exploitation is concerned,the insistence on the win-win cooperation mechanism is significant. In terms of environmental protection,the construction of the South China Sea Environmental Cooperation Mechanism could be initiated by China based on the Declaration on the Code of Conduct on the South China Sea. Nowadays,it is necessary to construct the legal regime in the South China Sea,which respects the historical facts and takes into account the regional common interests of the South China Sea,in order to safeguard the national maritime rights and interests.
机构地区 中国海洋大学
出处 《河南财经政法大学学报》 2016年第4期155-166,共12页 Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金 2015年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"‘一带一路’战略背景下我国海洋法律法规体系的完善研究"(15SFB5042)
关键词 南海仲裁案 九段线 国际法后果 法律对策 The South China Sea Arbitration nine-dash line consequences under international law response
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Robert Beckman:Summary of the Award on Jurisdiction [ BO/OL] . 2016-02-27. http ://cil. nus. edu. sg/programmes-and-activities/past-events/? all.
  • 2南海仲裁案结局揭晓:菲律宾自取其辱下场悲惨[BO/OL].2016-12—19.http://bbs.tiexue.net/post_9350717_1.html.
  • 3邢广梅.试论中菲南海仲裁案[J].国际关系研究,2013(6):42-56. 被引量:10
  • 4Arbitration between the Republic of Pillippines and the Penple' s Republic of China : Arbitral Tribunal Es- tablishes Rules of Procedure and Initial Timetable [ Z]. http ://www. pca-cpa, org/showpage, asp? pag_id = 1529. 2016-02-19.
  • 5高圣惕.论中菲南海仲裁案之“无效性”[J].国际问题研究,2015(5):65-90. 被引量:16
  • 6菲律宾诉中国仲裁案:仲裁庭确定程序规则及初步时间表[EB/OL].http://www.pea-epa.org/showfile.asp=23133,2016-02-19.
  • 7Arbitration between the Republic of Pillippines and the Penple' s Republic of China : Arbitral Tribunal Establishes Rules of Procedure and Initial Timetable [ Z ]. http ://www. pca-cpa, org/showpage, asp? pag _id= 1529. 2016-02-19.
  • 8王毅:中方不接受仲裁恰恰是依法行事[EB/OL].http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/zyxw/t1341216.shtml.2016—02—20.
  • 9AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER ANNEX VII TO THE 1982 UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA between THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES and THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA[ Z ]. http ://www. pca-cpa, org/showpage, asp? pag_id = 1529. 2016-02-19. para. 398-412. 409.
  • 10高圣惕.论南海仲裁案管辖权裁决之谬误.海南大学法学院.第一届海洋高端论坛.2016年第一届海洋高端论坛论文集[c].海南省南海政策与法律研究中心.2016(3).11-12.

二级参考文献63

  • 1万霞.试析软法在国际法中的勃兴[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2011,28(5):131-139. 被引量:23
  • 2沈固朝.关于北部湾的“历史性水域”[J].中国边疆史地研究,2000,10(4):44-59. 被引量:6
  • 3李扬勇.国际组织宣言和决议的法律意义——对国际环境法“软法”的探讨[J].孝感学院学报,2006,26(2):59-63. 被引量:2
  • 4汤旭红,蔡存强.特别敏感海域和特殊区域的对比研究[J].中国航海,2007,30(3):45-48. 被引量:5
  • 5曹丕富.《关于历史性权利与我国海域划界的研究》,载高之国、张海文主编.《海洋国策研究文集》,海洋出版社2007年版,第468页.
  • 6赵国材.《从国际法观点分析我国南海历史性水域之法律制度》,《问题与研究》1993年第8期,第13页.
  • 7珠江口发生国内最大溢油污染事故[EB/OL].http:/jwww.riel.whu.edu.cn/article.asp?id-28874,2007-04-18.
  • 8《中华人民共和国政府关于菲律宾共和国所提南海仲裁案管辖权问题的立场文件》,2014年12月7日,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_chn/zyxw-602251/t1217143.shtml,登录时间:2015年6月24日.
  • 9Michael Sheng-ti Gau, "The Sino-Philippine Arbitration of the South China Sea Nine- Dash-Line Dispute: Applying the Rule of Default of Appearance," Ocean Yearbook 28, May 2014, pp. 104-106.
  • 10D.W. Bowett, Self-Defense in International Law, Manchester University Press, 1958;Ian Brownlie, International Law and the Use of Force by States, Oxford University Press, 1963.

共引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部