期刊文献+

群体偏好与年级对小学生利他惩罚行为的影响 被引量:10

Effects of In-group Favoritism and Grade on the Altruistic Punishment Behavior of Primary School students
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用独裁者博弈(DG)探讨了群体偏好对不同年级小学生利他惩罚行为的影响。研究1对450名小学生利他惩罚行为的年级发展特点进行了测查。研究2以168名小学生为被试,考察了在独裁者博弈中与独裁者的关系、性别与年级对小学生(第三方)利他惩罚行为的影响。研究3以180名小学生为被试,考察了在独裁者博弈中与接受者的关系、性别与年级对小学生(第三方)利他惩罚行为的影响。结果发现:(1)利他惩罚行为在1至3年级之间有显著增长,3至5年级之间不仅没有增加反而有所下降。(2)3年级小学生开始表现出明显的群体偏好。(3)利他惩罚行为的性别差异不明显,与女生比男生更利他的预期相左。结论:小学生至少在6岁就已经出现了利他惩罚行为且逐渐表现出群体偏好;小学生道德行为发展中可能存在"3年级现象";女生可能更愿意通过非惩罚的方式达成公平。 The present research explored the developmental characteristics of primary school students ’altruistic punishment behavior and the influence of in-group favoritism. There were three mutually related studies. In study1,video typed dictator game tasks were used to examine the developmental characteristics of altruistic punishment,and the effects of gender and grade in 450 primary school students( grade 1,3 and 5). In study 2,we further explored the effects of gender and the group relationship between participants and dictators on altruistic punishment behavior in 168 primary school students from different grades. In study 3,the effects of gender and group relationship between the participants and the recipients in the dictator game was also explored. The results are as follows:( 1) School children show willingness to perform altruistic punishment which develops evidently from grade 1 to grade 3,but doesn’t increase significantly from grade 3 to grade 5( a certain degree of decline is even observed).( 2) From grade 3,altruistic punishment behavior begins to show significant in-group favoritism.( 3) Inconsistent with the prediction that girls are more altruistic than boys,we find no gender difference in altruistic punishment behavior. The results indicate that:( 1) Although only 6-year-old,Chinese children develop a willingness to perform the altruistic punishment behavior.( 2) Maybe a "3 grade phenomenon"does exist in Chinese children’s moral development.( 3) Probably the girls prefer Non- punitive ways to maintain fairness in interpersonal relationships.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期402-408,共7页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"慈善捐助的心理诱发机制研究"(15BSH083) 教育部人文社科规划基金项目"利他行为的启动机制和内隐测量研究"(13YJA190006) 山东省"人类认知与行为发展"重点实验室建设项目资助
关键词 独裁者博弈 利他惩罚 内群体偏好 3年级现象 dictator game altruistic punishment in-group favoritism three grade phenomenon
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Abrams, D. ,Rutland, A. , Cameron, L. , & Marques, J. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: When in - group bias gets specific. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21 ( 2 ), 155 - 176.
  • 2Apfelbaum, E. P. , Pauker, K. , Ambady, N. , Sommers, S. R. , & Norton, M. I. (2008). Learning (not) to talk about race: when ol- der children underperform in social categorization. Developmental Psy- chology, 44(5) , 1513 - 1515.
  • 3Blake, P. R. , & McAuliffe, K. (2011). "I had so much it didn't seem fair" : Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition, 120(2), 215 -224.
  • 4Bowles, S. , & Gintis, H. (2004). The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical Population Biolo- gy, 65(1) , 17 -28.
  • 5Boyd, R. , Gintis, H. , Bowles, S. , & Richerson, P. J. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(6), 3531 -3535.
  • 6Buckhohz, J. W. , Asplund, C. L. , Dux, P. E. , Zald, D. H. ,Gore, J. C. , Jones, O. D. , et al. (2008). The neural correlates of third-party punishment. Neuron, 60 (5), 930 - 940.
  • 7Chavez, A. K. , & Biccbieri, C. (2013). Third-party sanctioning and compensation behavior: Findings from the ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 268 - 277.
  • 8Cushman, F. , Dreber, A. , Wang, Y. , & Costa, J. (2009). Acci- dental Outcomes Guide Punishment in a "Trembling Hand" Game. PLOS ONE, 4 (8) , e6699 - e6699.
  • 9Dos Santos, M. , Braithwaite, V. A. , & Wedekind, C. (2014). Ex- posure to superfluous information reduces cooperation and increases an- tisocial punishment in reputation-based interactions. Frontiers in Ecolo- gy and Evolution, 2, 41.
  • 10Fehr, E. , Bernhard, H. , & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454 (7208) , 1079 - 1083.

二级参考文献93

  • 1刘明,邓赐平,桑标.幼儿心理理论与社会行为发展关系的初步研究[J].心理发展与教育,2002,18(2):39-43. 被引量:46
  • 2方富熹,王文忠.小学儿童奖赏公平性的认知发展[J].心理学报,1994,26(4):354-361. 被引量:9
  • 3赵景欣,张文新,纪林芹.幼儿二级错误信念认知、亲社会行为与同伴接纳的关系[J].心理学报,2005,37(6):760-766. 被引量:12
  • 4Benenson, J. F., Pascoe, J., & Radmore, N. (2007). Children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(3), 168-175.
  • 5Brownell, C. A., Svetlova, M., & Nichols, S. (2009). To Share or Not to Share: When Do Toddlers ResPond to Another's Needs? Infancy, 14(1), 117-130.
  • 6Camerer, C. F., & Fehr, E. (2006). When Does" Economic Man" Dominate Social Behavior? Science, 311(5757), 47-52.
  • 7Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory : Princeton University Press Princeton.
  • 8Camerer, C., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209-219.
  • 9Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2008). What's in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(1), 29-35.
  • 10Chiu, P. H., Kayali, M. A., Kishida, K. T., Tomlin, D., Klinger, L. G., & Klinger, M. R., et al. (2008). Self responses along cingulate cortex reveal quantitative neural Phenotype for high-functioning autism. Neuron, 57(3), 463-473.

共引文献60

同被引文献74

引证文献10

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部