期刊文献+

过敏性休克诊断方法研究进展 被引量:13

Research Progress in Diagnosis of Anaphylactic Shock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 过敏性休克发病急骤,难以预见,成为近年来引起医疗纠纷的重要原因之一。客观、科学、严谨和准确的法医学鉴定至关重要。当前过敏性休克死亡的法医学诊断主要是在排除其他疾病的基础上结合死者的病史、临床表现、组织病理学观察和生化指标检测做出诊断。由于过敏性休克临床表现和病理学形态没有特异性,也缺乏特异性的生化指标,过敏性休克的法医学鉴定仍然是一大难题。本文通过探讨过敏性休克的发生机制,对目前过敏性休克诊断的研究进展进行综述,并对下一步的研究作出展望。 Anaphylactic shock has an abrupt onset and is hard to be foreseen,which has become one of the important causes of medical disputes in recent years.An objective,scientific,rigorous and accurate forensic identification is essential for anaphylactic shock.The current forensic diagnosis of anaphylactic shock is mainly based on the medical history,clinical features,histopathological observations and biochemical tests in conjunction with the exclusion of other diseases.Because of the lack of specific clinical manifestations,pathologic morphology and biochemical markers,forensic identification of anaphylactic shock still remains a major problem.In this paper, we reviewed the recent progress in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of anaphylactic shock and discussed the prospect for further research.
出处 《实用临床医学(江西)》 CAS 2016年第5期101-104,共4页 Practical Clinical Medicine
关键词 过敏性休克 法医病理学 诊断方法 生化指标 anaphylactic shock forensic pathology diagnosis biochemical marker
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1Cianferoni A,Muraro A. Food-induced anaphylaxis[J]. Immu- nol Allergy Clin North Am,2012,32(1) t165-195.
  • 2Romano A, Fernandez Rivas M, Caringi M, et al. Allergy to peanut lipid transfer protein (LTP) :frequency and cross-reac- tivity between peanut and peach LTP['J]. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol,2009,41(4) : 106-111.
  • 3Rudders S A,Banerji A, Clark S, et al. Age-related differences in the clinical presentation of food-induced anaphylaxis[J]. Pe- diatr, 2011,158(2) : 326-328.
  • 4Munreal P, Botey J,Pena M, et al. Mustard allergy. Two ana- phylactic reactions to ingestion of mustard sauce[J]. Ann Al- lergy, 1992,69(4) :317-320.
  • 5Lieberman P, NiCklas R A,Oppenheimer J, et al. The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 up- date[J]. Allergy Clin Immunol, 2010,126 (3) : 477-480.
  • 6Pumphrey R S,Gowland M H. Further fatal allergic reactions to food in the United Kingdom, 1999-2006[J]. Allergy Clin Im- munol, 2007,119(4) : 1018-1019.
  • 7Boyee J A,Assa'ad A,Burks A W,et al. Guidelines for the di- agnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: report of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel[J]. Allergy C|in ImmunoI, 2010,126: S1-S58.
  • 8S:eherer S H. Clinical aspects of gastrointestinal food allergy in childhoo.d[J]. Pediatrics, 2003,111 : 1609-1616.
  • 9Cianferoni A, Novembre E, Mugnaini L, et al. Clinical features of acute anaphylax/s in patients admitted to a university hospi- tal:an ll-year retrospective review (1985-1996)[J]. Ann Al- lergy Asthma Immunol,2001,87(1),.27-32.
  • 10Novembre E, Cianferoni A, Bernardini R, et al. Anaphylaxis in children: clinical and allergologic features [J]. Pediatrics, 1998,101(4) : 1-8.

二级参考文献75

共引文献21

同被引文献127

引证文献13

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部