摘要
从试验波形、假人放置及评价指标等方面入手,对我国GB13057-2014及澳洲ADR68客车座椅法规进行对比分析。分别进行有约束、无约束两组4次对比试验,从乘员损伤指标、座椅及固定件状态两方面对试验结果进行分析。结果表明,满足GB13057-2014设计要求的情况下,进行ADR68试验仍存在较大风险,主要表现在乘员头部伤害指标HIC及座椅调角器失效,为此在座椅出口澳洲时,要针对靠背及调角装置进行针对性设计。
From aspects of test pulse,dummy placement and evaluation criteria,comparison of GB13057-2014 and ADR68regulation is made.Two groups of comparative tests are done with the condition of both constrained and non-constrained and the results are compared from aspects of dummy injury and anchorage condition.As a result,although the seat has meet the requirement of GB13057-2014,it still has a big risk of failing to pass ADR68.The risk mainly shows in HIC criterion and seat angle adjuster failure.Therefore,in the Australian export,the seat needs special design in backrest and angle adjuster.
出处
《机械工程与自动化》
2016年第4期140-141,143,共3页
Mechanical Engineering & Automation
