《让每个学生取得成功法》之立法演变与政策走向——基于问责的视角
摘要
无论从纵向的立法历程来看,还是横向基于考核、表现目标、指定与干预维度上的分析,都可看出《让每个学生取得成功》乃是民主、共和两党在教育政策上的妥协产物,更是分权与集权、问责制度与发展改进、顶层设计与本土变革之间的博弈结果。由此,有必要重新厘定分权与集权二者之关系;推进基于高风险测试的问责制度向绩效责任与发展改进共存发展;在变革力量上,由政治家、教育专家的顶层设计向地方教育管理人员、教师的本土变革倾斜。
出处
《当代教育科学》
北大核心
2016年第12期55-59,共5页
Contemporary Education Sciences
参考文献18
-
1Every Child Ready for College or Career Act of 2015[EB/OL]. http ://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/AEG15033.pdf.
-
2National Coalition for Public Education, We oppose the portabil- ity provision in the discussion draft of the "Every Child Ready for Col- lege or Career Act of 2015" [EB/OL]. http ://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/ campaign -k - 12/2015 -01-26% 20NCPE% 20Alexander% 20Portability% 20Sign- on%20-%20final.pdf.
-
3Comments to Senate HELP Committee on "Every Child Ready for College or Career Act" Discussion Draft [EB/OL]. https ://edtrust. org/press_release/comments -to -senate -help -committee -on -every - child-ready-for-college-or-career-act-discussion-draft/.
-
4Student Success Act[EB/OL]. http ://edworkforce.house.gov/up- loadedfiles/bills- 114hrSpcs.pdf.
-
5Opposing The Student Success Act [EB/OL]. http ://bobbyscott. house.gov/media -center/floor -statements/opposing -the -student -suc- cess-act.
-
6Minority View-H.R.5, "Student Success Act"[EB/OL]. http :// democrats.edworkforce.house.gov/sites/democrats.edworkforce.house.gov/files/MinorityViews_FIP.5-FINALwSignatures_O.pd~.
-
7The Every Child Achieves Act of 2015-summary; Summary of H. R. 5 as reported by the committee [EB/OL]. http://edworkforce.house. gov/uploadedfiles/hr_5_detailed_bill_summary.pdf.
-
8Every Student Succeeds Act [EB/OL]. https:// www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS - 114s 1177enr/pdf/BILLS - 114s 1177enr. pdf.
-
9Andy Smarick, Understanding the federal accountability spectra [EB/OL]. http ://edexcellence.net/articles/unde~tanding-the-federal-ac- countability-spectra.
-
10No Child Left Behind: Murray Outlines Priorities, Calls for Bi- partisan Fix to Broken Law [EB/OL]. http ://www.help.senate.gov/rank- ing/newsroom/press/no -child -left -behind -murray -outlines -priorities - calls-for-bipartisan-fix-to-broken-hw.
二级参考文献15
-
1Arne Duncan, U.S. Department of Education. Letters from the Education Secretary or Deputy Secretary [EB/OL]. http://www2, ed. gov/ policy/gen/guid/secletter/llO923, html. 2011- 09-23/ 2013-07-02.
-
2The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. President Obama Calls on Congress to Fix No Child Left Behind Before the Start of the Next School Year [EB/OL]. http://www. whitehouse, gov/the-press-office/2011/03/14/ president-obama-calls-congress-fix-no-child- left-behind-start-next-schoo. 2011-03-14/ 2013-06-20.
-
3U.S. Department of Education. A Blueprint for Reform: The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act [EB/OL]. http:// www2. ed. gov/poliey/elsec/leg/blueprint/ blueprint, pdf. 2010-03/ 2013-06-20.
-
4Martha Derthick and Andy Rotherham. Obama' s NCLB Waivers, Are they necessary or illegal [EB/OL]. http://educationnext, or nclb-waivers-are-they-necessary-or- 2012- 09/ 2013-07-02. g/obamas- -illegal/.
-
5U.S. Department of Education. ESEA Flexibility Request [EB/OL]. http://www. ed. gov/sites/ default/files/esea-flexibility- request, doc. 2012-02-10/ 2013-07-03.
-
6Dr. John Barge. Frequently Asked Questions for Parents and Families on Georgia' s ESFA Flexibility Waiver [EB/OL] bttp:// www. gadoe, org/External-Affairs-and-Policy/ communications/ Documents/Frequently%20 Asked%20Questions%20About%20Georgia's%20 NCLB%20Flexibility%20Waiver. pdf. p3, 2012-05- 02/ 2013-07-03.
-
7U.S. Department of Education. Obama Administration Approves NCLB Flexibility Request for New Hampshire 39 States and DC Now Approved for Waivers [EB/OL]. http:// www. ed. gov/news/press-releases/obama- administration-approves-nclb-flexibility- request-new-hampshire-39-states-a. 2013-06- 26/ 2013-07-05.
-
8John Fensterwald. Feds deny state a No Child Left Behind waiver [EB/OL]. http://www. edsour ee. org/today/2012/feds-deny-state-no- child-left-behind-waiver/24676: 2012-12-21/ 2013-07-05.
-
9John Fensterwald. U.S. Ed Department agrees to review 9 districts' plan for NCLB waiver [EB/OL]. http://www, edsource, org/today/2013/ u-s-ed-depar tment-agrees-t o-revi ew-9- district s-plan-for-nc lb-waiver/29331. 2013- 03-27/ 2013-07-05.
-
10U.S. Department Flexibility [EB/OL]. default/ files/esea- 06-07/ 2013-07-03. of Education. ESEA http://www, ed. gov/sites/ flexibility, doe. 2012.
共引文献11
-
1王健.当代课程改革的合理性反思:基于“有限理性”观[J].教育发展研究,2008,28(15):61-65. 被引量:3
-
2阎亚军.国外教育改革领域的三重“迷雾”[J].外国中小学教育,2009(2):12-14. 被引量:1
-
3周亚.园田化:集体化时期现代农业的规划与建设——以山西为中心的考察[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,36(3):90-95.
-
4彭虹斌,彭烨.美国NCLB法案框架下规则制定与调整的政策分析[J].外国中小学教育,2019(2):27-34. 被引量:1
-
5陈红梅.幼儿园与社区互动的策略选择[J].早期教育(幼教·教育科研),2015(5):49-51. 被引量:1
-
6洪明,练栅栅.美国教师培养质量认证的新近改革——CAEP认证标准的背景、内容和特点探析[J].教育文化论坛,2015,7(5):1-5. 被引量:8
-
7王蓓,彭泽平.新中国基础教育课程改革60年:历程与经验[J].教育与教学研究,2015,29(10):26-31. 被引量:4
-
8何美丽,俸晓锦,秦川.地方应用型本科院校教师发展探析[J].教师,2016,0(8):127-128. 被引量:1
-
9王淑芬,吴永军.小班化教育:是权宜之计,还是长久之策?[J].教育发展研究,2016,36(8):45-50. 被引量:3
-
10廉文.文献分析视角下我国基础教育改革研究现状[J].海南热带海洋学院学报,2016,23(6):122-128. 被引量:3
-
1李秀明,杜赟睿.工程管理本科专业现状及发展研究[J].企业家天地(下旬刊),2010(6):73-73. 被引量:2
-
2郭景辉.着眼学生发展改进语文教学[J].魅力中国,2014(5):202-202.
-
3陈克洪.初中数学教学中变式教学的应用[J].数学学习与研究,2015,0(4):42-42. 被引量:1
-
4梁铁宇.浅谈加强高校思想政治建设的措施[J].决策与信息,2014(36):47-47.
-
5崔颖.基于“双辅制”双语教学模式创新的实证研究[J].教育教学论坛,2015(6):96-98. 被引量:6
-
6黄华明,杨卫平,林美璇,王明亮.实施工科院校艺术教育课程目标探议[J].广东工业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(B06):145-147.
-
7李霞.深化信息素质教育改革 促进创新人才培养[J].读写算(教师版)(素质教育论坛),2008(2):44-45. 被引量:4
-
8李建中.谈“任务型教学”中大学英语教师的作用[J].教育与职业,2009(21):191-192. 被引量:5
-
9陈花.课堂评价——学生幸福成长的天地[J].数学学习与研究,2011(22):131-131.
-
10贾洋洋,苟江凤,李小红,陈末,马璐.信息技术在高中生物学科教学中的应用研究文献综述[J].科教导刊,2016(7X):133-135. 被引量:6