期刊文献+

规制非婚同居行为的法理思考

A Legal Reflection on the Regulation of Unmarried Cohabitation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 非婚同居现象渊源深远,无论中国还是西方社会,非婚同居的数量增加是新世纪的共同现象。不同的是,西方社会大多将非婚同居纳入法律调整的范围,而我国的法律基本上还是采取漠视和回避的态度。基于中国社会的现实以及国际社会的发展趋势,对规制非婚同居行为进行法理思考,并提出了规制非婚同居行为的法律构想,应对完善我国的婚姻立法有所裨益。 Unmarried cohabitation has a profound origin. In the new century, there was an increase in the number of unmarried cohabitants both in China and in western countries. The difference lies in the fact that most of western countries regulate the unmarried cohabitation but China basically takes the attitude of indifference and avoidance. Based on China 's social reality and the international development trend, the legal conception resulted from reflection, on how to regulate unmarried cohabitation will benefit our country's marriage legislation.
作者 丁素芳
出处 《闽南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2016年第2期32-37,共6页 Journal of Minnan Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词 非婚同居 国内现实 国际背景 人身权利 财产权利 unmarried cohabitation reality at home background abroad human rights possession rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献42

  • 1传统婚姻在美国地位明显下降[N].参考消息,2006-10-17,第6版.
  • 2ALI, Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution : Analysis and Recommendations. Philadeplhia: ALl, 2002 : 6. 03//Martha M. Ertman. The ALI Principles' Approach to Domestic Partnership[J]. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 2001, (8).
  • 3Sanford N. Katz, Family Law in America [ M ]. Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • 4Dee Ann Habegger. Living in Sin and the Law: Benefits for Unmarried Couples Dependent Upon Sexual Orientation? [J]. Indiana Law Review, 2000,(33).
  • 5Christopher D. Sawyer. Practice What you Preach: California's Obligation to Give Full Faith and Credit to the Vermont Civil Union [ J ]. Hastings Law Journal, 2003, (54).
  • 6William A. Reppy. Choice of Law Problems Arising When Unmarried Cohabitants Change Domicile [ J ]. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 2002, (55).
  • 7Fred A. Bemstein. Gay Unions Were Only Half the Battie [ J ]. New York Times, 6 April 2003.
  • 8Cynthia Grant Bowman. Legal Treatment of Cohabitation in the United States[ J]. Law & Policy, 2004, (1).
  • 9Megan E. Callan. The More, The Not Marry-er: In Search of a Policy Behind Eligibility for California Domestic Partnerships[J]. San Diego Law Review, 2003, (40).
  • 10George W. Bush. Presidential Announcement[Z]. The Guardian, February 25, at 2.//Anne Barlow & Rebecca Probert. Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation: Changing Family Values and Policies in Europe and North America-an Introductory Critique [ J ]. Law & Policy, 2004, ( 1 ).

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部