期刊文献+

乳腺肿物麦默通旋切与常规切除术的对比研究 被引量:45

Comparative Study Between Mammotome and Conventional Resection in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Mass
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较麦默通真空辅助乳腺微创旋切系统(Mammotome System,MMT)与常规乳房肿物切除术在乳腺肿物诊疗中的优劣。方法将2014年2~7月288例乳腺肿物按患者意愿分为MMT组(137例)和对照组(151例)。比较MMT与常规手术在手术及术后情况、术后并发症及患者疾病负担方面的不同。结果与对照组相比, MMT组手术时间短[(28.3±9.1) min vs.(37.5±14.2) min, t=-6.472, P=0.000],切取组织量多[(29.2±8.1) g vs.(16.5±7.9) g, t=13.462, P=0.000],术后1天疼痛视觉模拟评分低[(4.2±3.6)分vs.(4.9±1.5)分, t=-2.189, P=0.029],术后乳房形态改变少[10.2%(14/137) vs.55.0%(83/151),χ^2=64.392,P=0.000],患者满意度评分高[(7.2±1.8)分 vs.(5.3±2.9)分, t=6.601, P=0.000],但术中出血多[(22.3±4.3) ml vs.(12.6±5.9) ml, t=15.807, P=0.000],术后乳房内血肿发生率高[9.5%(13/137) vs.2.6%(4/151),χ^2=6.050,P=0.014],总费用高[(5.12±1.97)千元vs.(3.18±2.01)千元, t=8.258, P=0.000]。结论 MMT手术时间短,切取组织量多,术后疼痛轻,可更好地保持乳房形态,患者满意度高,但易形成乳房内血肿,总费用高。 Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages between the Mammotome ( MMT ) and conventional resection operation in the diagnosis and treatment of breast tumors . Methods A total of 288 patients during the period from February to July of 2014 were divided into MMT group ( 137 cases ) and control group ( 151 cases ) according to patient ’ s willingness .The surgical and post-operative results , postoperative complications and burden of disease were compared between the two groups . Results As compared to the control group, the MMT group had shorter operation time [(28.3 ±9.1) min vs.(37.5 ±14.2) min, t =-6.472, P=0.000], larger amount of tissue cut [(29.2 ±8.1) g vs.(16.5 ±7.9) g, t=13.462, P=0.000], lower visual analogue scales at one day after surgery [(4.2 ±3.6) points vs.(4.9 ±1.5) points, t=-2.189, P=0.029], lower incidence of postoperative breast shape change [10.2% (14/137) vs.55.0% (83/151), χ2 =64.392, P =0.000], and higher patient satisfaction scores [(7.2 ±1.8) points vs.(5.3 ±2.9) points, t=6.601, P=0.000], but more intraoperative bleeding [(22.3 ± 4.3) ml vs.(12.6 ±5.9) ml, t=15.807, P=0.000], higher incidence of postoperative breast hematoma [9.5% (13/137) vs. 2.6%(4/151),χ^2 =6.050, P=0.014], and higher total costs [(5.12 ±1.97) ×10^3 yuan vs.(3.18 ±2.01) ×10^3 yuan, t=8.258, P=0.000]. Conclusion The MMT operation has advantages of short time , more cut tissue volume, mild postoperative pain, good postoperative breast shape , and high patient satisfaction , but disadvantages of easy development of hematoma and high total costs.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期635-637,647,共4页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 麦默通真空辅助乳腺微创旋切系统 乳腺肿物 Mammotome system Breast mass
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献219

共引文献346

同被引文献298

引证文献45

二级引证文献252

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部