摘要
在《春秋繁露》所收与"五行"相关的九篇文本中,除《五行相生》《五行相胜》基本可定为董仲舒所作,《五行变救》尚难考定以外,其他六篇都不同程度地与《管子·四时》《淮南子·时则训》《淮南子·天文训》、董仲舒《孝经解》以及时代晚于董氏的刘向《洪范五行传论》等存在互见关系。通过对这些互见文本的比读,可发现《春秋繁露》"五行"诸篇包括董子原作、后人续作及二次续作三个层面,展现了后儒将董子"五行"生胜思想与秦汉时月令思想、《洪范》五行学乃至《孝经》学思想进行融合,构建新的"五行"学体系的尝试。这些衍生文本来源驳杂,常无法消除多源论述逻辑之间的抵牾,显露出"文本嫁接"的痕迹,其文本生成方式在早期著述传统中具有代表性,值得研究者关注。
In the nine articles involving Five Elements in Chunqiufanlu, except the two articles Wuzcingsciangsheng and Wuxingxiangsheng were certainly produced by Dong Zhongshu, the author of Wuxingbianshu is clear, the other six articles were more or less related to Guanzi Sishi, Huainanzi Shizexun, Huainanzi Tianwenxun, and Dong Zhongshu＇ s Xiaojingjie, Liu Xiang＇s Hongfanwuzcingzhuanlun. In comparison it is found out that seven articles in Chunqiufanlu include Dong Zhongshu~ s own works, sequels and even again reproductions by later generations. It demonstrates an attempt by later confucians to integrating Dong Zhongshu＇s idea about Five Elements rotation , thoughts of season changes in the Qin-Han times, Five Elements doctrine in Hongfan and even thinkings in Xiaojing. It aimed at creationg a new Five Element system. Those derivational texts had various sources, had contradiction in logics. It is a typical text grafting in traditional writings that researchers should notice.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第7期27-40,73,共15页
Journal of Historical Science
基金
国家社科基金资助项目"汉代<洪范>五行学研究"(14CZX022)
