摘要
从义务的来源来看,有我国国内、东道国、国际层面以及其他一些非正式的环保义务要求。就争端解决的运行逻辑而言,选择不同的争端解决机制,责任认定结果往往有所不同。中企预判自己直接投资于"一带一路"其他国家的环境责任,需要立足于环境争端的公正合理解决,明晰应该参照适用的环境标准、东道国生态环境规制措施的合法性和合理性、投资行为的真实生态环境后果和归责原则。
Environmental protection is an essential aspect of the Belt and Road Initiative.Chinese enterprises need to pay close attention to their environmental responsibilities arising from their foreign direct investments in other countries a-long the Belt and Road Initiative.Determination of environmental responsibility is required to consider the sources of en-vironmental obligations and the operational logic of dispute settlement.Chinese enterprises face the environmental obliga-tions from four dimensions which are domestic,host countries (regions),international and some other informal environ-mental obligations.Different approaches of dispute settlement mechanisms may lead to different results.For pre -jud-ging their environmental responsibilities,Chinese enterprises should,on the base of just and reasonable settlement of en-vironmental disputes,clarify the environmental standards,identify the legitimacy and rationality of governmental regula-tion,review the objective environmental consequences and determine the doctrine of liability fixation.
出处
《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期45-51,共7页
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University:Social Sciences
基金
教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目(14JZD022)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(XJTU-SK2014049)
关键词
对外直接投资
“一带一路”建设
生态文明
绿色发展
环境责任
多元纠纷解决机制
foreign direct investment (FDI)
One Belt and One Road construction
ecological civilization
green development
environmental responsibility
multiple dispute settlement mechanism