手写与键入影响读写效果的研究争论及启示

The Debate and Enlightenment on the Effects of Handwriting and Keyboarding on Literacy

传统手写过程存在动作轨迹和视觉的联合反馈,且直接产出字形;键入过程则分离了敲击动作和视觉空间,且字形是已定的,因此手写可能更有利于字词掌握及深层加工,从而对读写有更大的益处。文章指出,手写在对新字母的字形学习中有优势,但对单词的再认和拼写学习并不比键入更有优势;在诸如记笔记、作文等更高级的读写学习中,键入和手写各有长处。由于键盘上并不存在汉字,长期采用键入方式书写汉字,有可能会给我们的读写带来负面影响。

The process of traditional handwriting included combined feedback of movement and vision, and directly produced glyph; on the contrary, keyboarding process separated the motion and visual space, and the glyph was already designated. Thus handwriting maybe more conducive to the master and deep process of words and which was more beneficial to literacy compared to keyboarding. This paper indicated that handwriting had advantage on learning new letters over keyboarding, but did not have advantage on the recognition and spelling of words. In addition, in the more advanced learning, such as taking notes and composition, keyboarding and handwriting had their own strong points.Writing Chinese characters by keyboarding could bring about negative effect on our literacy, because Chinese characters did not exist on keyboard.