期刊文献+

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎比较 被引量:10

Comparison Between Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Open Appendectomy in the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床效果。方法选取本院2013年3月~2015年6月收治的急性阑尾炎患者60例,随机对照组与观察组,对照组给予开腹阑尾切除术治疗,观察组给予腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗,比较两组临床疗效。结果对照组总有效率为90.00%,观察组总有效为100.00%,两组数据比较,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=18.457 8,P〈0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术用于急性阑尾炎治疗,疗效显著。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis.Methods From March 2013 to June 2015,60 cases of patients with acute appendicitis in our hospital were divided into randomly control group and observation group,conducted open appendectomy to treat patients in control group,and conducted laparoscopic appendectomy to treat patients in observation group,then to compare the clinical treatment effect of the two groups.Results The total effective rate in control group is 90.00%,and the total effective rate in observation group is 100.00%.Compared the data in both groups,there was statistically significant in the difference(χ~2=18.457 8,P〈0.05).Conclusion The treatment effect of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is obvious.
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2016年第17期143-145,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 腹腔镜阑尾切除术 开腹阑尾切除术 临床疗效 Laparoscopic appendectomy Open appendectomy Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献57

  • 1王育和,刘家峰,徐大华,李非,孙家邦.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1184-1185. 被引量:78
  • 2宋学缪 阎玉矿 彭海峰.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术对比研究.中国基层医药,2008,.
  • 3Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy [ J ]. Endoscopy, 1983, 15 (2) : 59 -64.
  • 4Heikkineo TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost - effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study [ J]. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12 (10): 1204-1208.
  • 5Williams MD, Collins JN, Wright TF, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy [J]. South Med J, 1996, 89 (7): 668-674.
  • 6Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventionsversionS. 1. 0 (updated March 2011) [M/OL]. http : //www. cochrane - handbook. org/.
  • 7Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy [ J ]. Ann Surg, 1994, 219 (6): 725-728.
  • 8Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men [ J ]. World J Surg, 1996, 20 (3): 263-266.
  • 9Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, et al. Laparoscopie versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial [ J]. World J Surg,1996, 20 (1): 17-20.
  • 10Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plewes A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients [ J]. Can J Surg, 1996, 39 (6): 457-462.

共引文献231

同被引文献46

引证文献10

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部