期刊文献+

中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差在感染性休克液体复苏策略中的指导作用 被引量:8

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差(ΔPCO_2)作为检测指标指导感染性休克液体复苏治疗的可行性。方法选取感染性休克患者57例,随机分为试验组(n=30)和对照组(n=27)治疗。监测2组中心静脉压(CVP)、氧合指数(PaO_2/FiO_2)、ΔPCO_2、急性生理功能和慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ评分)、序贯器官衰竭估计(SOFA)评分、住ICU时间、机械通气时间、28 d病死率、6 h液体平衡。结果 2组治疗6 h后CVP,PaO_2/FiO_2均有明显升高,APACHEⅡ评分和SOFA评分均明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后试验组CVP和PaO_2/FiO_2均显著高于对照组,APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分以及住ICU时间、机械通气时间、6 h液体平衡均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组28 d病死率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论监测ΔPCO_2辅助液体复苏可有效降低液体平衡量,缩短机械通气时间和住ICU时间,改善治疗效果。
出处 《河北医药》 CAS 2016年第14期2164-2166,共3页 Hebei Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1刘刚,江宇,卢中秋,邱俏檬,李景荣,吴斌.感染性休克死亡率和危险因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(10):1229-1231. 被引量:28
  • 2Dellinger RP,Levy MM,Rhodes A,et al.Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2012.Crit Care Med,2013,41:580-637.
  • 3Bakker J,Vincent JL,Gris P,et al.Veno-arterial cabon dioxide gradient in human septic shock.Chest,1992,101:509-515.
  • 4Warren HS.Strategies for the treatment of sepsis.N Engl J Med,1997,336:952.
  • 5van L JJ,Harms MP,Pott F,et al.Stroke volume of the heart and thoracic fluid content during head-up and head-down tilt in humans.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2005,49:1287-1292.
  • 6Schmidt GA,Koenig S,Mayo PH.Shock:ultrasound to guide diagnosis and therapy.Chest,2012,142:1042-1048.
  • 7潘永,张云海,张斌,招兰芝,戚振红,江皓波,叶蝶莲,黄国敏,徐杰.脓毒症休克患者胸腔内血容量指数与中心静脉压的相关研究[J].广东医学,2010,31(24):3233-3234. 被引量:6
  • 8Marik PE,Cavallazzi R.Does the Central Venous Pressure Predict Fluid Responsiveness?An Updated Meta-Analysis and a Plea for Some Common Sense.Crit Care Med,2013,41:1774-1781.
  • 9Bognar Z,Foldi V,Rezman B,et al.Extrava scular lung water index as a sign of developing sepsis in burns.Burns,2010,36:1263-1270.
  • 10Chung FT,Lin SM,Lin SY,et al.Impact of extravascular lung water index on outcomes of severe sepsis patients in a medical intensive care unit.Respir Med,2008,102:956-961.

二级参考文献20

  • 1王邦松,李庆兴,泮发愤.复数菌败血症感染的危险因素和耐药菌谱分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2004,14(7):741-743. 被引量:30
  • 2王今达,王宝恩.多脏器功能失常综合征(MODS)病情分期诊断及严重程度评分标准(经庐山’95全国危重病急救医学学术会讨论通过)[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(6):346-347. 被引量:1414
  • 3成人严重感染与感染性休克血流动力学监测与支持指南[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(4):344-349. 被引量:91
  • 4Lamia B, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Meaning of arterio-venous PCO2 difference in circulatory shock. Minerva Anestesiol,2006 ,72 :597- 604.
  • 5Vallee F, Vallet B, Mathe O, et al. Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference: an additional target for goal-directed therapy in septic shock?. Intensive Care Med, 2008,34: 2218- 2225.
  • 6Brun-Buisson C. The epidemiology of the systemic inflammatory response. Intensive Care Med ,2000,26 Suppl 1 :$64-74.
  • 7Vallet B, Futier E. Perioperative oxygen therapy and oxygen utilization. Curr Opin Crit Care,2010,16:359-364.
  • 8Cusehieri J, Rivers EP, Donnino MW, et al. Central venous- arterial carbon dioxide difference as an indicator of cardiac index. Intensive Care Med,2005 ,31:818-822.
  • 9Tsaousi GG, Karakoulas KA, Amaniti EN, et al. Correlation of central venous-arterial and mixed venous-arterial carbon dioxide tension gradient with cardiac output during neurosurgical procedures in the sitting position. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2010, 27 : 882-889.
  • 10Gaidukov KM, Len'kin AI, Kuz'kov VV,et al. Central venous blood oxygen saturation and venous to arterial PCO2 difference after combined heart valve surgery. Anesteziol Reanimatol,2011, (3) :19-21.

共引文献166

同被引文献72

引证文献8

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部