期刊文献+

电视椎间盘镜手术与融合术治疗老年性腰椎管狭窄合并骨质疏松症的疗效对比 被引量:2

Comparison of Therapeutic Effect Between The Treatment of Elderly Patients With Lumbar Stenosis Complicated With Osteoporosis By The Operation and The Fusion of The TV
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨电视椎间盘镜手术与融合术治疗老年性腰椎管狭窄合并骨质疏松症的临床治疗效果。方法选取2013年1月至2015年1月我院诊治的100例老年性腰椎管狭窄合并骨质疏松症患者资料进行分析,采用随机数字方法将患者分为对照组和实验组,对照组采用腰椎融合术治疗,实验组采用电视椎间盘镜手术与融合术治疗,比较两组疗效。结果实验组40例痊愈,5例显效,3例好转,总有效率为96%,显著高于对照组(80%)(P<0.05);实验组48例满意,满意率为96%,高于对照组(60%)(P<0.05);实验组术后复发率为4%,显著低于对照组(10%)(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗前临床基本无差异,实验组治疗后康复时间显著比对照组短(P<0.05)。结论电视椎间盘镜手术与融合术治疗老年性腰椎管狭窄合并骨质疏松症的临床治疗效果理想,患者复发率低,康复时间相对较短,值得推广应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical therapeutic effect of the treatment of senile lumbar stenosis complicated with osteoporosis by the operation and fusion of the lumbar vertebral canal stenosis. Methods From January 2013 to January 2015, 100 cases of senile patients with lumbar stenosis and osteoporosis were randomly divided into control group and experimental group. The control group was treated with lumbar interbody fusion, and the experimental group was treated with electro optic disc surgery and fu-sion. The efficacy of two groups was compared. Results 40 cases were cured, 5 cases markedly effective, 3 cases improved, the total effective rate was 96%, significantly higher than the control group (80%) (P〈0. 05);48 cases were satisfactory, the satisfaction rate was 96%, the recurrence rate was 4%, the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group (10%) (P〈0. 05). Two groups of patients before treatment, the clinical basic no difference, the experimental group after treatment significantly shor-ter than the control group (P〈0. 05). Conclusion The clinical therapeutic effect of the treatment of senile lumbar stenosis complicat-ed with osteoporosis by the operation and the fusion of the TV.
作者 姚练波
出处 《哈尔滨医药》 2016年第3期219-220,共2页 Harbin Medical Journal
关键词 电视椎间盘镜手术 融合术 老年性腰椎管狭窄合并骨质疏松症 Television disc surgery Arthrodesis Senile lumbar spinal stenosis with osteoporosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1吕廷灼,王文志,冯世庆.腰椎融合术的治疗进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2011,19(9):747-749. 被引量:30
  • 2王璐璐,陈晓亮.腰椎融合术的研究进展[J].齐鲁医学杂志,2011,26(6):559-561. 被引量:8
  • 3陈宣煌,李荣议,陈金辉,郑祖高,张威,林海滨.椎间盘镜下等离子刀髓核消融的临床研究[J].中国当代医药,2011,18(8):5-6. 被引量:4
  • 4Khanma GH,Combscs DJ,Bruntem CF, et al. Positronemis- sion to mographyscatming in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann Nucl Med,2009,14t(2) :121 - 126.
  • 5Tabit CE, Chung WB, Hamburg NM, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications [ J ]. Rev Endocr Metab Disord, 2010,11(1) :61 -74.
  • 6Endemann DH, Sehiffrin EL. Endothelial dysfunction [ J ]. JAm Soc Nephro1,2010,15 ( 8 ) : 1983 - 1992.
  • 7IzzardAS, Rizzoni D, Agabiti - Rosei E, et al. Small artery structure and hypertension:adaptive changes and target or gan damage [ J ]. J Hypertens, 2011,23 ( 2 ) : 247 - 250.
  • 8Zhang Y, Li W, Yan T, et al. Early detection of lesions of dorsal artery of foot in patients with type 2 diabetes me llitus by high - frequency ultrasonography[J]. JH uazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2011,29 (3) :387 - 390.

二级参考文献41

  • 1庄苏阳,吴小涛,茅祖斌,齐新生,王宸,陈辉,李永刚,孔翔飞,卜星平.显微内镜椎间盘切除术预防硬膜外粘连的探讨[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(5):376-378. 被引量:8
  • 2申勇,张少嘉,董玉昌,丁文元,张同庆,孟宪忠,姚晓光.两种手术方式治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的疗效比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(1):18-20. 被引量:13
  • 3常增林,刘建明,崔新广,黄彬,庄正陵,青光恒,刘涛.内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(7):513-515. 被引量:14
  • 4陈志文,丁真奇,周亮,黄哲元,芮昊.棘突椎板作为骨源椎间植入在下腰椎椎间融合中的应用[J].临床骨科杂志,2007,10(2):162-163. 被引量:6
  • 5Heary RF, Bono CM. Circumferential fusion for spondylolisthesis in the lumbar spine[ J]. Neurosurg Focus,2002,1:3.
  • 6Fantini GA, Pappou IP, Girardi FP, et al. Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery : incidence, risk factors, and management [ J]. Spine ,2007,24:2751 - 2758.
  • 7Hsieh PC, Koski TR, Shaughnessy BA ,et al. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:im- phcalions for the restoration of foraminal height,local disc angle,lum- bar lordosis,and sagittal balance[ J]. Neurosurg Spine,2007,4:379 - 386.
  • 8Ekman P, Mouller H, Tullberg T, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fu- sion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis [ J ]. Spine ,2007,20:2178 - 2173.
  • 9McAfee PC, DeVine JG, Chaput CD, et al. The indications for inter- body fusion cages in the treatment of spondylolisthesis:analysis of 120 caces [ J ]. Spine,2005,6:60 - 65.
  • 10Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V, et al. Transforaminal lumbar in-terbody fusion:a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year re- suits [ J ]. Eur Spine,2005,5:551 - 558.

共引文献39

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部