期刊文献+

高龄钙化性主动脉瓣重度狭窄患者的临床研究 被引量:4

Clinical Research of Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis in Older Patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价高龄钙化性主动脉瓣重度狭窄患者临床特点,对比不同治疗方案的预后。方法连续回顾收集我院住院诊断重度主动脉瓣狭窄高龄患者226例,分为药物组、PBAV、TAVR和SAVR,随访观察全因死亡终点。结果患者平均年龄78.9±3.1岁,四组死亡率为46.6%、44.4%、7.2%、6.5%。TAVR、SAVR较药物组死亡率减低(p<0.0001)。多因素回归分析显示,糖尿病(OR=0.65,95%CI:1.056-3.471)、EF(OR=-0.036,95%CI:0.945-0.984)、合并二/三尖瓣病(OR=0.742,95%CI:1.104-3.991)是1年全因死亡独立危险因素。结论糖尿病、EF、合并二/三尖瓣病是高龄重度主动脉瓣狭窄1年全因死亡独立危险因素,换瓣手术较药物治疗明显改善预后。 Objective To analyze the risk factors of older patients with calcific severe aortic valve stenosis. We sought to analyze mortality and to compare the security of different treatment. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 226 consecutive patients older than 75 years who were diagnosed aortic severe stenosis between January 2008 and January 2015 in our institution. All patients were followed at 1 year. Compare the differences in mortality among groups of drug treatment, PBAV, TAVR and SAVR. Results The mortality of drug group, PBAV, TAVR, SAVR were 46.1%, 44.4%, 7.2%, 6.5%. The mortality was significantly difference between drug and TAVR/SAVR(p〈0.0001). Three variables including diabetes mellitus(OR=0.65, 95% CI: 1.056-3.471), EF(OR=-0.036, 95% CI:0.945-0.984), Concomitant mitral/tricuspid valve disease(OR=0.742, 95% CI:1.104-3.991)were independently correlated with patient all cause mortality of one year. Conclusion The mortality of drug treatment was higher compared with TAVR and SAVR. Diabetes mellitus, EF, Concomitant mitral/tricuspid valve disease were independently risk factors of 1-year all cause mortality.
出处 《中国分子心脏病学杂志》 CAS 2016年第3期1710-1713,共4页 Molecular Cardiology of China
关键词 主动脉瓣重度狭窄 主动脉瓣换瓣手术 高龄 Aortic Severe Stenosis Aortic Valve Surgery Older
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献40

  • 1宋克勤,聂洁莹.老年退行性心脏瓣膜病的临床与超声研究[J].中国心血管康复医学,1997,6(1):24-25. 被引量:1
  • 2刘力生.2004年中国高血压防治指南(实用本)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(12):1060-1064. 被引量:2620
  • 3Ross J Jr, Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation 1968; 38: 61-67.
  • 4Cheitlin MD, Gertz EW, Brundage BH, Carlson CJ, Quash JA, Bode RS Jr. Rate of progression of severity of valvular aortic stenosis in the adult. Am Heart J 1979; 98:689'7001.
  • 5Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006; 368: 1005-1011.
  • 6Schwarz F, Banmann E Manthey J, Hoffmann M, Schuler G- Mehmel HC, et al. The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival. Circulation 1982; 66: 1105-1110.
  • 7Murphy ES, Lawson RM, Starr A, Rahimtoola SH. Severe aortic stenosis in patients 60 years of age or older: left ventricular function and 10-year survival after valve replacement. Circulation 1981; 64: II- 184-II-188.
  • 8Lund O. Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification Of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: reasons for earlier operative intervention. Circulation 1990; 82: 124-139.
  • 9Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1597-1607.
  • 10US Bureau of the Census. Statistical abstract of the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000.

共引文献49

同被引文献20

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部