期刊文献+

中西“时机”观考辨——《论语》与《伊索克拉底文集》比较 被引量:3

Timing in the Analects and Isocrates
原文传递
导出
摘要 "时机"是一个早在古典时期就深受东西方思想家所关注的重要概念,然而迄今似尚未出现相关的中西比较研究。本文选择了体现古希腊人文风貌的《伊索克拉底文集》与代表春秋思想精华的《论语》,经由概览数目相当的所有篇目,对其中具有典型性的时机言论作了考辨。研究发现:无处不在的时机之用是两者的共识;然《论语》更重失时的性质、误机的原因、契机与否的结果,《文集》则尤为关注应机之策的探寻。对孔子与伊氏"时机"观的考辨,有助于推动核心范畴的比较,而中西时机观的融合将更好地服务于当代全球化的言说语境。 Timing is an important concern of both ancient Greek and Chinese philosophers, where no comparative research seems to have been conducted. This paper chooses Isocrates, a Greek classic, and Analects, a masterpiece in the Spring and Autumn Period, for a systematic comparison of their typical remarks on timing. The findings reveal that both lay emphasis on timing, but Analects devotes more to examining the nature, cause and consequence of missing or grabbing the opportune moment, while Isocrates at- tends to proper strategies of apprehending the opportunities. This inquiry is to promote comparisons of shared key categories, and to better serve the current globalized world.
作者 袁影
出处 《中国比较文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期183-193,共11页 Comparative Literature in China
基金 国家社科项目"常用修辞格的论辩性语篇功能研究"(编号15BYY178)初期成果
关键词 时机 凯洛斯 伊索克拉底 孔子 timing kairos Isocrates Confucius
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Bizzell, Patricia, and Bruce Herzberg. The Rhetorical Tradition." Readings from Classical Times to the Present. Boston: Bedford Books of St. Martin's Press, 1990.
  • 2Conley, Thomas M. Rhetoric in the European Tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1990.
  • 3Isocrates. ISOCRATES. Trans. George Norlin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1928, 1929.
  • 4Isocrates.ISOCRATES I. Trans. David Mirhady & Yun Lee Too. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2000.
  • 5Li, Bingnan. Interpretations of Analects (lun yu jiang yao). Wuhan: Changjiang Literature and Art Publishing House, 2011.
  • 6Liu, Yameng. A History of Western Rhetoric ( xi fang xiu ci xue shi). Beijing: Foreign Lan- guage Teaching and Research Press, 2008.
  • 7Sipiora, Phillip, and James S. Baumlin. Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in History, Theory, and Praxis. Albany : State University of New York Press, 2002.
  • 8Yuan, Ying ed. and note. Readings in Western Rhetoric ( xi fang xiu ci xue jing dian wen xuan). Suzhou: Soochow University Press, 2013.
  • 9袁影,蒋严.论“修辞情境”的基本要素及核心成分——兼评比彻尔等“修辞情境”观[J].修辞学习,2009(4):1-8. 被引量:21
  • 10陈光磊,王俊衡.《中国修辞学通史-先秦两汉魏晋南北朝卷》,长春:吉林教育出版社,1998年.

二级参考文献33

  • 1吴礼权.修辞心理学论略[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),1998,40(5):101-107. 被引量:10
  • 2王德春,陈汝东.话语角色认知的修辞价值[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),1998,2(4):19-24. 被引量:9
  • 3袁影.论语言哲学知识的猜测与反驳[J].山东外语教学,2006,27(6):22-25. 被引量:1
  • 4Campbell,George.The Philosophy of Rhetoric[M].London:Feffer and Simom,1969.
  • 5Consigny,Scott.Rhetoric and Its Situations[J].Philosophy and Rhetoric 7.3 1974.
  • 6Crowley,Sharon,and Debra Hawhee.Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students[M].Boston:Allyn and Bacon,1999.
  • 7Enos,Theresa.Encyclopedia of Rhetoxic and Composition[Z].New York:Garland Pubhshing.INC.,1996.
  • 8Gore,Philip B.Webster's Third New International Dictionary[Z].Springfield:Merriam-Webster INC.,Publishers,1993.
  • 9Hauser,Gerard A.Introduction to Rhetorical Theory[M].New York:Harper & Row,Publishers,1986.
  • 10Humaker,David M and Craig R.Smith.The Nature of Issues:A Constructive Approach to Situa tional Rhetoric[J].Western Journal of Speech Communication 40.sunlmer 1976.

共引文献26

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部