期刊文献+

集成电子探测器联合迭代重建技术不同层厚重建对冠脉支架显示的影响:体外实验研究 被引量:1

Coronary artery stent imaging using an integrated electronics detector and different slice reconstructions: in vitro experience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :评价联合集成电子探测器与SAFIRE迭代重建技术在不同重建层厚下对不同内径冠脉支架尤其是≤3 mm支架显示的影响。方法:选取不同类型的8枚内径分别为3.5 mm、3 mm以及2.5 mm的支架(编号1~8),释放于模拟冠脉血管的体外模型中,行配有集成电子探测器的双源CT进行冠脉前瞻扫描,将扫描后得到的原始数据按照不同层厚(0.5 mm、0.6 mm、0.75 mm)进行图像重建分为3组。对上述3组图像进行主客观评价,包括图像质量评分、支架内径差异(Artificial lumen narrowing,ALN)、支架内腔衰减(Attenuation)、图像噪声及衰减噪声比(Attenuation-to-noise ratio,ANR)的评价,统计分析各组间的差异性。结果:图像质量主观评分一致性良好(Kappa=0.797),0.5 mm重建组获得的图像质量明显高于另两组(P值分别为0.008,0.000)。0.5 mm层厚组ALN值最低,为40.69%±4.16%,与其他各组间均有统计学差异(P值分别为0.043,0.018,P〈0.05)。各组之间,衰减值差异、ANR均未达到统计学意义(P值均〉0.05)。随着重建层厚的增加,图像噪声逐渐降低,但0.5 mm组及0.6 mm组之间图像噪声无明显差异。结论:对于冠脉支架评估,集成电子探测器0.5 mm层厚重建配合SAFIRE迭代重建技术获取的图像质量整体最佳,尤其是对于≤3 mm支架,可为临床提供更佳质量的支架图像。 Objective: To assess the visualization improvement for different coronary stents especially ≤3 mm, using different image slice thickness reconstructed by integrated electronics. Methods: Eight different coronary stents with inner diameter of 3.5 mm, 3 mm and 2.5 mm were placed in plastic tubes filled with contrast agent(iohexol 350 mg I/m L) diluted with saline to make sure that the CT value of contrast was about 350 HU at 120 k Vp. The whole phantom was then settled in an oil tank to mimic the pericardium fatty environment. All the CT scanning data was acquired using Siemens Definition Flash with a in-tegrated electronics detector under prospective coronary CTA mode. Images were reconstructed into 0.5, 0.6 and 0.75 mm slice thickness. Two experienced radiologists blinded to each other evaluated the image quality, image noise, artificial lumen narrow-ing(ALN), lumial attenuation difference and attenuation-to-noise ratio(ANR). Results: Among the 3 groups, 0.5 mm images reconstructed were rated best for clearly showing the details of the stents and the inner-lumen situations(Kappa =0.797). The ALN value of 0.5 mm group was the lowest(40.69%±4.16%), and was superior to 0.6 and 0.75 mm groups(P=0.043, 0.018, P〈0.05). But the differences of luminal attenuation and ANR among the three groups were not significant( P〈0.05). With the in creasing of the iterative reconstruction slice thickness, the image noise decreased, but the differences between 0.5 mm and 0.6 mm groups were not statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion: Stent visualization can be benefited from 0.5 mm slice thickness image for more accurate lumen narrowing assessment and lower image noise.
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第7期467-470,481,共5页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
关键词 支架 冠状血管造影术 体层摄影术 X线计算机 Stents Coronary angiography Tomography X-ray computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Harald S, Murat O, Rainer R, et al. 64-Versus 16-slice CT an- giography for coronary artery stent assessment: in v/tro experience [J]. Invest Radiol, 2006, 41(1): 22-27.
  • 2Ehara M, Surme.ly JF, Kawai M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically sig- nificant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive pa- tient population: cmnparison with conventional invasive angiogra- phy[J]. Cir J Off J Jap Cir Soc, 2006, 70(5): 564-571.
  • 3Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/ AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Car- diovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Hear Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiol- ogy Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovas- cular Computed Tomography [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2009, 53(6): 530-553.
  • 4Florian A, Grigorios K, Waldemar H, et al. Performance of dual source versus 256-slice multi-slice CT in the evaluation of 16 coronary artery stents[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(4): 601-607.
  • 5Fabian M, Lotus D, Andra P, et al. Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: impact of an itegrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction[J]. Invest Radiol, 2013, 480): 32-40.
  • 6Donati OF, Burg MC, Desbiolles L. High-pitch 128-slice dual- source CT for the assessment of coronary stents in a phantom model[J]. Acad Radiol, 2010, 17(11): 1366-1374.
  • 7Eisentopf J, Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, et al. Low-dose dual- source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation[J]. Jacc Cardiovascular Imaging, 2013, 6(4): 458-465.
  • 8Ulrich A, Burg MC, Raupach R, et al. Coronary stent imaging with dual-source CT: assessment of lumen visibility using differ- ent convolution kernels and postprocessing filters [J]. Acta Radiol, 2015, 56(1): 42-50.
  • 9王彦懿,初金刚,于扬,赵宇,金士琪,杨帆,戴旭.不同迭代重建强度对冠状动脉小内径支架显示影响的体外实验[J].中国医学影像技术,2015,31(8):1271-1275. 被引量:6
  • 10Achenbach S, Ropers U, Kuettner A, et al. Randomized com- parison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomogra- phy coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease[J]. Jacc Cardiovasc Imaging, 2008, 1(2): 177-186.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Morsbach F, Desbiolles L, Plass A, et al. Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: Impact of an integrated circuit de- tector with iterative reconstruction. Invest Radiol, 2013,48 (1) : 32-40.
  • 2Von Spiczak J, Morsbach F, Winklhofer S, et al. Coronary artery stent imaging with CT using an integrated electronics detector and iterative reconstructions: First in vitro experience. J Cardiovascul Corn Tomogr, 2013,7(4) :215-222.
  • 3Andr~ F, Korosoglou G, Hosch W, et al. Performance of dual source versus 256-slice multi-slice CT in the evaluation of 16 coro- nary artery stents. Eur J Radiol, 2013,82(4) :601-607.
  • 4Zhou QJ, Jiang B, Dong F, et al. Computed tomography coro- nary stent imaging with iterative reconstruction: A trade-off study between medium kernel and sharp kernel. Comput Assist To- mogr, 2014,38(4) :604-612.
  • 5Yang WJ, Chen KM, Pang LF, et al. High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stent imaging : A phantom study. Korean J Radiol, 2012,13(1) :20-26.
  • 6Baumueller S, Winklehner A, Karlo C, et al. Low-dose CT of the lung: Potential value of iterotive reconstructions. Eur Radiol, 2012,22(12) : 2597-2606.
  • 7Funama Y, Oda S, Utsunomiya D, et al. Coronary artery stent evaluation by combining iterative reconstruction and high-resolu- tion kernel at coronary CT angiography. Acad Radiol, 2012, 19 (11) : 1324-1331.
  • 8Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R, et al. 64- versus 16-slice CT angiography {or coronary artery stent assessment: In vitro experi- ence. Invest Radiol, 2006,41(1):22-27.
  • 9von Spiczak J, Morsbach F, Winklhofer S, et al. Coronary artery stent imaging with CT using an integrated electronics detector and iterative reconstructions: First in vitro experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2013,7(4) :215-222.
  • 10Achenbach S, Ropers U, Kuettner A, et al. Randomized com- parison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tornography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery dis- ease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2008,1(2) : 177-186.

共引文献5

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部