期刊文献+

胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全身麻醉对乳腺癌手术炎性反应的影响 被引量:16

Effects of thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia on inflammatory reaction in breast cancer surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全身麻醉对乳腺癌改良根治术患者炎性反应的影响。方法:连续48例接受乳腺癌改良根治术患者被随机分配到全凭静脉全身麻醉组(GA组)或胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)复合全凭静脉麻醉组(PG组)。PG组在超声引导下于T4间隙行TPVB后,两组行全凭静脉麻醉;分别于麻醉前(T0)、手术开始30 min(T1)、术毕(T2)、术后8 h(T3)采集静脉血样,测定IL-6和IL-10的浓度,同时观察心率和平均动脉压的变化。结果:与T0时比较,两组患者在T2和T3时刻,IL-6和IL-10表达均明显升高(P<0.05);与GA组比较,PG组IL-6表达水平更低(P<0.05),而IL-10表达水平则更高(P<0.05)。结论:胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全身麻醉用于乳腺癌改良根治术患者时,可在一定程度上抑制炎性因子的释放。 Objective: To investigate inflammatory reaction in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery by ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block(TPVB) combined with general anesthesia. Methods: After local ethics committee approval, 48 consecutive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery were randomized into the GA or the PG group. TPVB guided by ultrasound was app|ied on PG group patients; blood samples were collected at preanesthetie(T0), 30 rains after surgery started(T1),when surgex~~ was completed (T2) and postoperative g h (T3). Serum IL-6 and IL-10 were determined by ELISA while the changes of HR and MAP were observed. Results: Compared with TO, IL-6 and IL-10 expressions of patients in T2 and T3, were significantly increased (P〈0.05); compared with the GA group, expression of 1L-6 levels of PG group were significantly lower (P 〈0.05), while IL-10 expression levels were higher (P〈0.05). Conclusion: TPVB can reduce inflammatory reaction in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.
出处 《天津医科大学学报》 2016年第4期332-335,共4页 Journal of Tianjin Medical University
关键词 胸椎旁阻滞 麻醉 炎症反应 乳腺癌改良根治术 thoracic paravertebral block anesthesia inflammatory reaction modified radical mastectomy of breast cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献67

  • 1李挺,许爱军,徐旭仲.超声引导技术与神经阻滞[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2004,25(6):372-374. 被引量:24
  • 2唐大年,韦军民,朱明炜,黄美雄,吴蓓,李永国.老年消化道疾病患者围手术期死亡病例分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(1):38-40. 被引量:10
  • 3张静,崔苏扬.术后镇痛与免疫[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(9):717-718. 被引量:65
  • 4赵守华,刘向阳,张德超,赫捷.70岁以上老年肺癌患者术后严重并发症和死亡危险因素分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(9):660-663. 被引量:35
  • 5Vuori A, Salo M, Viljanto J, et al. Effects of postoperative pain treatment using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics, opioids or epidural blockade oilsystemic and local immune responses in children[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2004, 48(6): 738-49.
  • 6Ogawa K, Hirai M, Katsube T, et al. Suppression of cellular immunity by surgical stress[J]. Surgery 2000, 127(3): 329-36.
  • 7Choileain NN, Redmond HP. Cell response to surgery [J]. Arch Surg, 2006, 141(11): 1132-40.
  • 8Volk T, Schenk M, Voigt K, et al. Postoperative epidural anesthesia preserves lymphocyte, but not monocyte, immune fimction atter major spine surgery[J]. Anesth Analg, 2004, 98(6): 1086-92.
  • 9Roediger L, Joris J, Senard M, et al. The use of pre-operative intrathecal morphine for analgesia following coronary artery bypass surgery[ J ]. Anaesthesia, 2006, 61 (9): 838-44.
  • 10Senturk M.Acute and chronic pain after thoracotomies:editorial review.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2005,18(1):1-4.

共引文献250

同被引文献121

引证文献16

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部