司法鉴定程序通则疑难问题的解读与思考

Interpretation and Consideration on Some Issues Relating to the General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedure

2016年修改的《司法鉴定程序通则》在体系结构优化和司法鉴定质量强化等方面具有实质性的进步意义。但在"协议书"修改为"委托书"、规定"相关专业"以及诉讼外"参照本办法执行"等方面还存在认识上的分歧。对这些问题由于未能作出清晰说明,致使其在实施过程中颇具争议,亟待理论上从鉴定本质、鉴定规律以及学界在术语的共识上作出符合法理的解释,以便化解司法鉴定实践中不够统一的做法以及法庭上出现的不应有诘问,进而保障司法鉴定程序通则在实施中的有效性与维护其程序的权威性。

The amendment of the General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedure made real progress in the structure optimization and quality enhancement of judicial appraisal. However, there are still some divergences in understanding, such as changing ＂agreement＂ into ＂proxy＂, setting up the requirement of ＂relevant profession＂, the provision of ＂to be applied by analogy of these Principles＂. As there is no unambiguous interpretation about these issues, lots of disputes in the implementation of the General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedure occurred. It is urgent for scholars to make an explanation, which is in line with the legal theory, of the essentials, rules and consistent academic terms of judicial appraisal procedure. Only in this way can we solve these differences in practice and undue disputes in court. Then the validity and authoritativeness of the General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedure can be maintained.