期刊文献+

下肢机器人对多发性硬化患者肌张力及残疾水平的影响 被引量:3

Robot-assisted therapy improves spasticity in multiple sclerosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察下肢机器人训练(RAGT)对于多发性硬化(MS)患者肌张力及残疾水平的影响。方法选取痉挛伴有运动障碍的MS患者28例,其中对照组14例,治疗组14例。对照组给予常规康复训练,治疗组在常规康复训练的基础上应用RAGT进行辅助训练。于治疗前和治疗4周后(治疗后)采用改良的Ashworth量表和功能残疾扩展量表(EDSS)分别评价2组患者的痉挛程度及残疾水平。结果治疗后,治疗组患者的Ashworth评分和EDSS评分分别为1.00分和5.25分,与组内治疗前和对照组治疗后比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);而对照组仅EDSS评分与组内治疗前比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论常规康复训练结合机器人辅助步行训练可显著改善MS患者的痉挛程度和残疾水平。 Objective To determine any effect of robot-assisted therapy (RAGT) in relieving disability and spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis ( MS). Methods Twenty-eight MS patients were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group. Both groups received routine rehabilitation, while the treatment group addition- ally underwent RAGT 5 times a week for 4weeks in the hospital. Both groups were assessed using the extended disa- bility status scale (EDSS) and the modified Ashworth scale before and after the treatment. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups' average EDSS and modified Ashworth scores before the treatment. In the treatment group, both measurements significantly improved compared to those before the treatment and compared with those of the control group after the treatment. For the control group, significant differences were observed only by com- paring the average EDSS score before and after the treatment. Conclusion Routine rehabilitation can relieve disa- bility, but it can hardly alleviate spasticity. However, RAGT combined with routine rehabilitation can improve both disability and spastieity.
出处 《中华物理医学与康复杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期509-512,共4页 Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81171183) 国家临床重点专科建设项目 天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划(15JCZDJC35700) 天津医科大学总医院青年孵育基金(Zyyfy2015013)
关键词 多发性硬化 下肢机器人 功能扩展量表 痉挛 Multiple sclerosis Robots Gait training Spasticity
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1李立敏,杨丽,付莹,张璘洁,张大启,李欣,齐媛.多发性硬化患者的嗅觉功能研究[J].中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2015,22(4):246-249. 被引量:1
  • 2Beard S, Hunn A, Wight J.Treatments for spasticity and pain in mul- tiple sclerosis: a systematic review[ J]. Health Technol Assess,2003, 7(40) :iii, ix-x, 1-111. $6.
  • 3MJ. Exercise therapy and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review [J]. J Neurol, 2014 , 26l ( 9 ) : 1651-1661. DOI: 10. 1007/s00415- 013-7183-9.
  • 4Epub 2013 Nov 22. Wier LM, Hatcher MS, Triehe EW, et al. Effect of robot-asslsted ver- sus conventional body-weight-supported treadmill training on quality of life for people with multiple sclerosis[ J]. J Rehabil Res Dev ,2011,48 (4) :483-492.
  • 5McDonald WI, Cmnpston A, Edan G, et al.Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis [ J ]. Ann Neurol, 2001,50 ( 1 ) : 121-127.
  • 6锁冬梅,范金涛,傅帆,刘海杰.机器人辅助步行训练在康复领域中的研究进展[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2013,35(4):330-332. 被引量:8
  • 7Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity[ J] .Phys Ther, 1987,67(2) :206-207.
  • 8Rabadi MH, Vincent AS. Comparison of the Kurtkze expanded disa- bility status scale and the functional independence measure: measures of multiple sclerosis-related disability [ J ]. Disabil Rehabil, 2013,35 (22) : 1877-1884. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.766269.
  • 9Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an ex- panded disability status scale (EDSS) [J]. Neurology, 1983,33 (11): 1444-1452.
  • 10Hughes S, Spelman T, Trojano, et al.The Kurtzke EDSS rank stability increases 4 years after the onset of multiple sclerosis: results from the MSBase Registry[ J ]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2012. 83 (3) : 305-310. DOI: lO.1136/jnnp-2011-301051.

二级参考文献82

  • 1各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33037
  • 2郭俊,李宏增.多发性硬化的灰质损害[J].中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,2007,14(5):263-264. 被引量:2
  • 3Sunderland A,Tinson D,Bradley L,et al.Arm function after stroke.An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,1989,52:1267-1272.
  • 4Canning CG,Ada L,Adams R,et al.Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity.Clin Rehabil,2004,18:300-308.
  • 5Butefisch C,Hummelsheim H,Denzler P,et al.Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand.J Neurol Sci,1995,130:59-68.
  • 6Bourbonnais D,Bilodeau S,Lepage Y,et al.Effect of force-feedback treatments in patients with chronic motor deficits after a stroke.Am J Phys Med Rehabil,2002,81:890-897.
  • 7Sharp SA,Brouwer BJ.Isokinetic strength training of the hemiparetic knee:effects on function and spasticity.Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1997,78:1231-1236.
  • 8Weiss A,Suzuki T,Bean J,et al.High intensity strength training improves strength and functional performance after stroke.Am J Phys Med Rehabil,2000:79:369-376.
  • 9Nudo RJ,Wise B M,SiFuentes F,et al.Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct.Science,1996,272:1791-1794.
  • 10Liepert J,Hamzei F,Weiller C.Lesion-induced and training-induced brain reorganization.Restor Neurol Neurosci,2004,22:269-277.

共引文献50

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部