期刊文献+

浅论简·爱身份的男性化转化

On Jane Eyre's Male Identity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于简·爱,学界普遍认可她是女权主义的典型代表,她奋斗的一生是反抗男权社会的一生,最终通过自身的反抗获得了人生的幸福。无论是在里德太太家、洛伍德学校,还是在桑菲尔德庄园、沼泽居,抑或是最后定居的芳玎庄园,简·爱的奋斗历程都是在逐步抛弃自己女性身份的过程,最终以男性身份获得了幸福。 For Jane Eyre, the academic community generally accepts the view that she was a typical representative of feminism, and she got the happiness of life through her own resistance. In the authores'view, whether she was in Mrs. Reed' s, Lowood school, or at Thornfield Hall, Moor House, or Fangding manor, Jane Eyre gradually abandoned her female identity. In the end, she got the happiness she wanted by the male identity.
作者 余珊
出处 《桂林师范高等专科学校学报》 2016年第4期63-66,共4页 Journal of Guilin Normal College
关键词 简·爱 女权主义 身份认同 男权属性 后现代女权主义 Jane Eyre feminism identity male attribute ecology of postmodern feminism
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1夏洛蒂·勃朗特.简·爱[M].黄源深,译.南京:译林出版社,2010:7,7,53,252,252,252.
  • 2皮埃尔·布尔迪厄.男性统治[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012.5-9.
  • 3西蒙娜·波伏娃.女性的秘密[M].晓宜,译.北京:中国国际广播出版社,1988.
  • 4苏珊·格里芬.自然女性.[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,1988.
  • 5朱迪斯·巴特勒.身体之重:论“性别”的话语界限[M].李钧鹏译.上海:上海三联书店,2011年,p.139.
  • 6朱迪斯·巴特勒.性别麻烦[M].宋素风译.上海:上海三联书店,2009.
  • 7陈姝波.论《简爱》中的性别意识形态[J].外国文学研究,2002,24(4):79-83. 被引量:54
  • 8高晓倩.《简·爱》婚姻话语中的矛盾[J].外国文学研究,2011,33(2):36-44. 被引量:4

二级参考文献34

  • 1Eagleton,Terry. Myth of Power: A Marxist Study of the Brontes. London: Macmillan, 1975.
  • 2Ewbank, Inga-Stina. Their Proper Sphere. London: Edward Arnold, 1966.
  • 3Hammerton, A. James. Cruelty and Companionship : Conflict in Nineteenth-century Married Life. London and New York : Routledge, 1992.
  • 4Matus, Jill. "' Strong Family Likeness' : Jane Eyre and The Tenant of Wildfell Hall. " The Cambridge Companion to the Brontes. Ed. Heather Glen. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. 99 -121.
  • 5Politi, Jina. "Jane Eyre Classified. " Literature and History 8.1 (1982) :56 -66.
  • 6Rublaek, Jorg. Charlotte Bronte: Jane Eyre. Munchen: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1985.
  • 7Wise, Thomas James, et al. , eds. The Brontes: Their Lives, Friendships & Correspondence. Vol. III. of The Shakespeare Head Bronte. Philadelphia: Porcupine Press, 1980.
  • 8Wolfe, Peter. Jean Rhys. Boston : Twayne Publishers, 1980.
  • 9Michel Foucault, Archaeology of Knowledge, Trans. A. M.Sheridan Smith ( New York : Pantheon, 1972) 215 - 37.
  • 10Terry Eagleton, Myth of Power: A Marxist Study of the Brontes ( London : Macmillan, 1975 ).

共引文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部