期刊文献+

SOX方案与改良mFOLFOX6方案治疗弥散型进展期胃癌的疗效和安全性比较 被引量:13

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Gio Combined with Oxaliplatin versus Fluorouracil Combined with Calcium Folinate and Oxaliplatin in the Treatment of Diffuse Advanced Gastric Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较替吉奥联合奥沙利铂(SOX方案)与5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)、左亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂(改良m FOLFOX6方案)治疗弥散型进展期胃癌的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性收集128例弥散型进展期胃癌患者资料,按用药方案不同将所有患者分为SOX组(66例)和m FOLFOX6组(62例)。SOX组患者给予替吉奥胶囊,体表面积<1.25 m2为40 mg,1.25~1.5 m2为50 mg,>1.5m2为60 mg,早晚餐后口服,d_(1-14)+注射用奥沙利铂130 mg/m^2,静脉滴注,d1;3周为1个周期,每2个周期评价疗效,最多治疗8个周期,至少治疗2个周期。m FOLFOX6组患者给予注射用奥沙利铂85 mg/m^2,静脉滴注,d1+注射用左亚叶酸钙200 mg/m^2,静脉滴注,d1+注射用5-FU 400 mg/m^2,快速静推,d1,后给予5-FU 2 400 mg/m^2,持续泵入维持46 h;2周为1个周期,每3个周期评价疗效,最多治疗12个周期,至少治疗3个周期。观察两组患者的临床疗效,疾病进展时间、生存时间及毒副反应发生情况。结果:SOX组患者客观有效率、中位疾病进展时间、中位生存时间均显著优于m FOLFOX6组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。两组患者疾病控制率、毒副反应发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:SOX方案治疗弥散型进展期胃癌的疗效优于改良m FOLFOX6方案,可延长患者生存时间,且安全性相似。 OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficacy and safety of gio combined with oxaliplatin(SOX) versus 5-fluorouracil(5-FU)combined with calcium folinate and oxaliplatin(m FOLFOX6)in the treatment of diffuse advanced gastric cancer. METHODS:The data of 128 patients with diffuse advanced gastric cancer was retrospectively analyzed and patients were divided into SOX group(66 cases)and m FOLFOX6 group(62 cases)by different medication. SOX group received Gio capsule after breakfast and dinner,which was 1.25 m2,40 mg,〈1.25-1.5 m^2,50 mg,〉1.5 m2,60 mg,d1-14+130 mg/m^2 Oxaliplatin for injection,intravenously,d1;3-week was regarded as a treatment course,the efficacy was evaluated every 2 courses,and it lasted a maximum of 8courses but a minimum of 2 courses. m FOLFOX6 group received 85 mg/m2 Oxaliplatin for injection,intravenously,d1+200 mg/m^2 calcium folinate,intravenously,d1+400 mg/m25-FU for injection by rapid intravenous injection,d1,then 2 400 mg/m25-FU,maintaining 46 h by continuous infusion. 2-week was regarded as a treatment course,the efficacy was evaluated every 3 courses,and chemotherapy was conducted in a maximum of 12 courses but a minimum of 3 courses. Clinical efficacy,time to progression,survival time and incidence of toxicities in 2 groups were observed. RESULTS:The objective response rate,time to progression and median survival time in SOX group was significantly higher than m FOLFOX6 group,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05 or P〈0.01). There was no significant difference in the disease control rate and incidence of toxicities in 2 groups(P〉0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The efficacy of SOX is superior to m FOLFOX6 in the treatment of diffuse advanced gastric cancer,it can prolong the survival time,with similar safety.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第21期2903-2906,共4页 China Pharmacy
关键词 弥散型进展期胃癌 替吉奥 奥沙利铂 5-氟尿嘧啶 左亚叶酸钙 疗效 安全性 Diffuse advanced gastric cancer Gio Oxaliplatin 5-fluorouracil Calcium folinate Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Van Cutsem E,Moiseyenko VM,Tjulandin S,et al.PhaseⅢstudy of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer:a report of the V325Study Group[J].J Clin Oncol,2006,24(31):4 991.
  • 2Ross P,Nicolson M,Cunningham D,et al.Prospectiverandomized trial comparing mitomycin,cisplatin,and protractedvenous-infusion fluorouracil(PVI 5-FU)With epirubicin,cisplatin,and PVI 5-FU in advancedesophagogastric cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2002,20(8):1 996.
  • 3Kang YK,Kang WK,Shin DB,et al.Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer:a randomised phaseⅢnoninferiority trial[J].Ann Oncol,2009,20(4):666.
  • 4B?lke E,Peiper M,Budach W.Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2008,358(18):1 965.
  • 5Bang YJ,Van Cutsem E,Feyereislova A,et al.combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer(To GA)a phase 3,open-label,randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2010,376(9 742):687.
  • 6Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA,et al.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors.European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer,National Cancer Institute of the United States,National Cancer Institute of Canada[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3):205.
  • 7皋文君,刘砚燕,袁长蓉.国际肿瘤化疗药物不良反应评价系统——通用不良反应术语标准4.0版[J].肿瘤,2012,32(2):142-144. 被引量:524
  • 8Henson DE1,Dittus C,Younes M,et al.Differential trends in the intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma in the United States,1973-2000 increase in the signet ring cell type[J].Arch Pathol Lab Med,2004,128(7):765.
  • 9Ichikawa W,Takahashi T,Suto K,et al.Thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene expression in relation to differentiation of gastric cancer[J].Int J Cancer,2004,112(6):967.
  • 10Fukushima M,Morita M,Ikeda K,et al.Population study of expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in patients with solid tumors[J].Int J Mol Med,2003,12(6):839.

二级参考文献31

  • 1秦叔逵,龚新雷.晚期胃癌化疗的现状和新进展[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2006,11(9):641-652. 被引量:268
  • 2卜擎燕,熊宁宁,邹建东,蒋萌,刘芳,Anna Zhao-Wong.ICH国际医学用语词典(MedDRA):药事管理的标准医学术语集[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2007,12(5):586-590. 被引量:39
  • 3季加孚.我国胃癌防治研究三十年回顾[J].中国肿瘤临床,2013,40(22):1345-1351.
  • 4Shirasaka T. Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1) : its clinical usefulness and future vistas[ J~. Jpn J Clin Onco1,2009,39( 1 ) :2 - 15.
  • 5Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T,et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S- 1 alone forfirst=lille treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial) : a pha~e 1~ trial[ J]. Lancet Oncol,2008,9(3) :215 -221.
  • 6Ajani JA, Is the addition of cisplatin to S-1 better than S-1 alone for patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer ~ J ]. Nat Clin Pratt Oneol, 2008,5 ( 9 ) :508 - 509.
  • 7白璐.替吉奥联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J].承德医学院,2012.
  • 8Huang D, Ba Y, Xiong J,et al. A multicentre randomised trial comparing weekly paclitaxel q- S-1 with weekly paclitaxel q- 5-fluorouracil for patients with advanced gastric cancer[J].Eur J Cancer, 2013, 49(14): 2995-3002.
  • 9Ajani JA, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G, et al. Multicenter phase Ill comparison of :cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/iMusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocareinoma study: the FLAGS trial [J]. J Clin Oncol,2010, 28(9): 1547-1553.
  • 10Yoshida M, Ishiguro M, Ikejiri K, et al. S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon eancer: a randomized phase Ill study (ACTS-CC trial)[J]. Ann Oneol, 2014, 25 (9): 1743-1749.

共引文献544

同被引文献135

引证文献13

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部