期刊文献+

文学评论期刊与《项狄传》小说属性的形成

Literary Review Journals and the Establishment of Tristram Shandy's Novel-ness
原文传递
导出
摘要 《项狄传》的文类属性始终是斯特恩研究传统中的一个关键争议点。已有研究主要围绕作者意图进行解读,忽略了18世纪中叶兴起的文学评论期刊对这部作品小说属性形成的影响。《项狄传》的跨年连载形式促成了斯特恩与文学评论期刊之间的特殊协商关系,两者的协商推动了斯特恩在《项狄传》创作过程中逐渐剥离讽刺文属性,增加小说属性,最终融入18世纪小说传统。这一协商过程不仅见证了小说文类兴起过程中对讽刺文的吸纳,而且折射出新旧文学传统更替背后的社会文化语境变迁。 The question of which genre Tristram Shandybelongs to has been contro- versial in the studies of Sterne. The existing studies tend to explore the writer's intention to define its genre, neglecting the role played by the literary review journals which rose in the middle of the 18th century. The yearly installment of Tristram Shandy results in a special negotiation between Sterne and literary review journals. This relationship leads Sterne to gradually reducing the satire-ness, increasing the novel-ness in Tristram Shan- dy, and ultimately integrating into the novel tradition of 18th-century England. The ne- gotiating process not only witnesses the novel's absorption of satire, but also reflects the transformation of social and cultural environment underlying the substitution of the old literary form by a new one.
作者 魏艳辉
出处 《外国文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期41-50,共10页 Foreign Literature
关键词 《项狄传》 斯特恩 文学评论期刊 小说 讽刺文 Tristram Shandy, Laurence Sterne, literary review journals, novel, satire
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Boulton, James T. Jahnson The Critical Heritage. New York: Routledge, 1996.
  • 2Burney, Frances. Evelina. Ed. Stewart J. Cookie. New York: Norton, 1998.
  • 3Cross, John. The Rise and Fall of the Man of Letters: Aspects of English Literary Life since 1800. London.. Morrison, 1969.
  • 4Defoe, Daniel. Robinson Crusoe, Middlesex: Penguin, 1979.
  • 5Donoghue, Frank. The Fame Machine: Book Reviewing and Eighteenth-Century Literary Careers. Stanford. Stanford UP, 1996.
  • 6Fielding, Henry. Tom Jones: The Authoritative Text, Contemporary Reactions, Criticism. Ed. Sheridan Baker. New York. Norton, 1995.
  • 7Howes, Alan B. Yorick and the Critics: Sterne's Reputation in England, 1760-1868. New Haven: YaleUP, 1958.
  • 8Johnson, Samuel. A Dictionary of the English Language. London: J. f. and C. Rivington, 1785.
  • 9Johnson, Samuel. The Rambler. 8 vols. Edinburgh: Sands, 1777.
  • 10Knight, Charles. The Literature of Satire. Cambridge: CUP, 2007.

二级参考文献31

  • 1Lodwick Hartley, Sterne in the Twentieth Century: An Essay and a Bibliography of Sternean Studies 1900 -1965 (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 196) , 131 - 154.
  • 2Alan B. How ed., Laurence Sterne: The Critical Heritage ( London and New York: Routledge, 1971 ) , pp. 47-48, p. 77, p. 390.
  • 3劳伦斯·斯特恩:《项狄传》,蒲隆译,译林出版社2006年版,71-82,110页.
  • 4Theodore Baird, "The Time-Scheme of Tristram Shandy and a Source", PMLA 51 (1936) , pp. 803 -820.
  • 5Wayne Booth, "Did Sterne Complete Tristram Shandy?" , Modern Philology 48 (1951), pp. 172 - 183.
  • 6William Bowman Piper, "Tristram ' s Disgressive Artistry " , Lattrence Sterne ' s Tristram Shandy, ed. Howard Anderson (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1980), pp. 259 -270.
  • 7Wolfgang Iser, Laurence Sterne: Tristram Shandy, trans.David Henry Wilson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 128.
  • 8Victor Shklovsky, " Sterne' s Tristram Shandy: Stylistic Commentary", Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, trans. Lee T. Lemon and Marion J. Reis ( Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965), p. 57.
  • 9F. R. Leavis, The Great Tradition (London: Chatto & Windus, 1962), p. 2.
  • 10Alan D. McKillop, "A View of Sterne's Art, rev. of Tristram Shandy' s World: Sterne' s Philosophical Rhetoric, by 1ohn Traugott" , The Sewanee Review 63 ( 1955 ) , p. 687.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部