期刊文献+

局部亮度与语义关系对真实情景识别的影响 被引量:3

Effect of Local Luminance Change and Semantic Relation on Real-World Scene Recognition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以真实情景图片为材料,探讨局部亮度与语义关系对情景识别的影响,以及情景背景线索和语义关系的获得。实验一结果显示,被试对有无语义关系情景图片的识别反应时存在显著差异,且对拼接图片的识别正确率更高,反应时更短。实验二探讨了局部亮度与呈现时间变化条件下情景背景线索和语义关系的获得。结果发现,情景语义关系和背景信息的获得受到局部亮度变化和呈现时间的影响。这表明,语义关系和呈现时间对情景识别存在显著影响,而且这种影响与情景背景线索和语义关系的获得有关。呈现时间越长,越易获得情景语义关系。局部亮度变化越小,背景线索越易获得,呈现时间的影响越小。 Humans lived in a variety of real situations, and they were influenced by all kinds of information from real-world scenes. However, the real-world scene included not only physical information, such as color, luminance etc., but also semantic information closely related to individual knowledge. So people's recognition of real-world scenes was the result of the interaction between a top-down processing and a bottom-up processing. The purpose of the present study was to explore the influence of scene physical features and the semantic properties on scene recognition. Two experiments were conducted to explore how scene information processing influenced recognition of real-world scene. Experiment 1 compared the recognition lit of the scene images with semantic relation or not-under-different-rendering time conditions, and analyzed the effect of local luminance change on the scene recognition. The results showed that the recognition liT of the scene images with semantic connection was faster than the lit of the images without semantic connection, F(1, 87) = 328.82,p 〈 .05, n2 = .23; the main effect of rendering time was found, F(1, 87) = 7.58, p 〈 0.05, n2 = .07, and the lit under the 120ms rendering time condition was faster than that under the 60ms rendering time condition. Analysis of the correct rate and liT of the measure pictures showed that the recognition rate of the mosaic pattern was higher, F(2, 29) = 80.44,p 〈 .05, 112 = .105, and the reaction time was faster, F(2, 29) = 90.99,p 〈 0.05, n2 = .106, but the recognition rate of inverted image was lower and the reaction time was slower In experiment 2, the researchers tried to explore the effects of local luminance change and rendering time on obtaining scene background cues or semantic relation. The results showed that the rendering time (F(1, 87) = 6.90,p 〈 .05, 172 = .01) or local luminance change (F(2, 87) = 5.04,p 〈 .05, n2 = .02) has the main effect on the scene semantic acquisition, and the interaction between the rendering time and local luminance change was not significant, F(2, 87) = 0.33, p 〉 .05, n2 = .001. Subjects could obtain harder scene semantic relation when scenes were presented quickly, or the luminance of scene was 60%. On the other hand, the time of obtaining background cues was influenced by the main effect of local luminance change (F(2, 87) = 26.59,p 〈 .05, n2 = .10) and the interaction of the two different factors (F(2, 87) = 10.79,p 〈 .05,172 = .05). Scene background cues were obtained under the 40% luminance conditions more easily than under the 60%, 80% luminance conditions. The above-mentioned results indicated that scene recognition was influenced by scene semantic relation, and the effect of local luminance change on scene recognition was inhibited by scene semantic acquisition. During the scene recognition process, the obtaining of background cues or scene semantic relation was influenced by the rendering time and local luminance change. The slower the rendering time, the smaller the local luminance change, and the background information or scene semantic relation was easier to obtain.
作者 康廷虎 王丽
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期835-841,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(13CSH074)的资助
关键词 局部亮度 语义关系 情景识别 local luminance, semantic relation, scene recognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1白学军,康廷虎,闫国利.真实情景中刺激物识别的理论模型与研究回顾[J].心理科学进展,2008,16(5):679-686. 被引量:12
  • 2白学军,魏玲,沈德立.背景线索对室内场景中目标搜索的注意引导[J].心理学探新,2011,31(2):122-127. 被引量:9
  • 3康廷虎,白学军.靶刺激变换与情景信息属性对真实情景再认的影响[J].心理科学,2013,36(3):558-565. 被引量:3
  • 4田宏杰,王福兴,徐菲菲,申继亮.场景知觉中物体加工的背景效应[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(6):878-886. 被引量:9
  • 5Bar, M. 2007, The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognigve Sciences, 11, 280-289.
  • 6Biederman, I. (1981), On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organisation (pp. 213-252), Hillsdale, NJErlbaum.
  • 7Birminghama, E, & King, stone, A. 2009, Human social attention: A new look at past, present, and future investigations. The Year in Cogrff6ve Neuroscienee: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 118-140.
  • 8Brockmole, J. R, Hambrick, D. Z, Windisch, D. J, & Henderson, J. M. 2008, The role of meaning in contextual cueing: Evidence from chess expertise. Tbe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(12), 1886-1896.
  • 9Bruce, N. D. B, & Tsotsos, J. K. 2006, Saliency based on information maximization. Advances in Neural Infonnagon Processing Systems, 18, 155- 162.
  • 10Davenport, J. L, & Potter, M. C. 2004, Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psycholocal Science, 15, 559-564.

二级参考文献122

  • 1陶云.图画知觉过程的眼动研究进展[J].心理科学,2001,24(2):194-196. 被引量:27
  • 2傅小兰,赵晓东.信息表征形式对解决贝叶斯推理问题的影响[J].心理与行为研究,2005,3(2):109-115. 被引量:13
  • 3李会杰,陈楚侨.注意捕获的另一扇窗户——无意视盲[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):577-586. 被引量:17
  • 4Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M.(2006). Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts, dournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 699-706.
  • 5Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, ,J. M. (2005). Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. Visual Cognition, 12, 1017-1040.
  • 6Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 753-763.
  • 7Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
  • 8Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
  • 9Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
  • 10Davenport, J. L. (2007). Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35, 393-401.

共引文献24

同被引文献28

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部