1Buchanan, R. Rhetoric, humanism, and design. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds), Discovering design: Explorations in design studies (pp 23- 66). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1995.
2Buchanan, R. Design as inquiry: The common, future and current ground of design. In J. Redmond, D. Durling & A. de Bono (Eds.), Futureground: Proceedings of the Design Research Society International Conference (pp 9-16). Melbourne, Australia: Monash University. 2004.
3Krippendorff, K. On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition that "Design Is Making Sense (of Things)" . In V. Margolin & R. Buchanan (Eds.), The Idea of Design (pp 156-184). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 1995.
4Diller, S,, Shedroff, N., & Rhea, D. Making meaning." How successful businesses de/iver meaningful customer expenences. Berktey, CA: New Riders. 2006.
5Krippendorff, K., &Butter, R. Semantics: Meanings and contexts of artifacts. In Hendrik N, J. Schifferstein & Paul Hekkert (eds.) Product Experience (pp 353-376). Amsterdam; London: Elsevier Science. 2008.
6Blumer, H. The nature of symbolic interactionism. In C. David. Mortensen (Ed.) Basic Readings in Communication Theory (pp 102-120), New York : Harper & Row. 1979.
7Niedderer, K., & Reilly, L. New knowledge in the creative disciplines - proceedings of the first Experiential Knowledge conference 2007. Journal of VisualArt Practice, 6(2), pp 81-87. 2007.
8Yee, J, S. R. Capturing tacit knowledge: documenting and understanding recent methodological innovation used in Design Doctorates in order to inform Postgraduate training provision. In K, Niedderer, L. Reilly, S. Roworth- Stokes, & C. Smith (Eds,), Expenential knowledge, method & methodology: Proceedings of the EKSIG 2009, London, UK: London Metropolitan University, 2009.Retrieved from http://www. experientialknowledge,org.uk/resources.html.
9Ma, J. A Phenomenological /nquiry into the Experience of Having a Design Concept. Gothenburg,Sweden: Mistra Urban Futures. 2013.
