期刊文献+

消费者保护领域惩罚性赔偿的制度嬗变与未来改进 被引量:24

Punitive Damages in Law on the Protection of Consumers: Evolution and Improvement
原文传递
导出
摘要 惩罚性赔偿制度的理想范型可以概括为:为满足"激励"、"惩罚"和"威慑"的制度功能,惩罚性赔偿适用于行为人具有恶性过错的侵权责任,并以"基准赔偿数额+增加赔偿数额"为赔偿标准计算方法,其中基准赔偿数额恒定为受害人的实际损失,增加赔偿数额则与基准赔偿数额存在比例关系。我国《消费者权益保护法》、《食品安全法》和法释〔2003〕7号中的相关惩罚性赔偿立法可以分类为"颠覆类型"、"标准类型"和"变通类型"三种。针对在立法中规则的碎片化、不系统所造成的标准不一和适用困难,应当进行立法三类型之间的联动和整合,形成以《消费者权益保护法》规定为基准,以商品房购买、食品安全等领域特殊立法为补充的惩罚性赔偿制度体系。 A typical system of punitive damages is applicable to tort liability,and the standard of compensation of it is " basic amount + additional amount". Punitive damages in the legislation of the protection of consumers and food safety in China,as well as the judicial interpretation of commercial housing sales,can be classified as " fake form", " typical form" and " flexible form". Because of the difficulty in unification and application caused by trivialness of rules,three forms in legislation shall be integrated in order to constitute a new system,in which the rule in " Law on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Consumers" is fundamental,and the rules in special field such as food safety and commercial housing sales are complementary.
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期114-123,共10页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(15JZD009)"我国食品安全法律实施研究"
关键词 惩罚性赔偿 消费者保护法 基准赔偿数额 增加赔偿数额 食品安全法 punitive damages law on the protection of consumers basic amount additional amount food safety law
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1[英]瓦内萨·维尔科克斯.英国的惩罚性赔偿金[M]//.[奥]赫尔穆特·考茨欧,[奥]瓦内萨·威尔科考斯.惩罚性赔偿金:普通法与大陆法的视角.窦海阳,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2012.
  • 2梁慧星.《消费者权益保护法》第49条的解释适用[M}//.梁慧星.民商法论丛(第20卷).香港:金桥文化出版(香港)有限公司,2001.
  • 3牟瑞瑾.《消费者权益保护法》第49条的适用条件[M]//.梁慧星.民商法论丛(第15卷).北京:法律出版社,1999.
  • 4[美]安东尼·J·塞博克.美国的惩罚性赔偿金[M}//.[奥]赫尔穆特·考茨欧,[奥]瓦内萨·威尔科考斯.惩罚性赔偿金:普通法与大陆法的视角.窦海阳,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2012.
  • 5Linda L. Schlueter: Punitive Damages (5th edi), Vol. 1. [ M]. Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. 2005.
  • 6Ernest Gellhorn, William E. Kovacic, Stephen Calkins. Antitrust Law and Economics (5th ed. ) [ M ]. Sao Paulo : West Pub-lishing Co. 2004.
  • 7[英]A.G.盖斯特.英国合同法案例[M].张文镇,等译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1998.
  • 8王利明,杨立新,王轶,陈啸.民法学(第三版)[M].北京:法律出版社,2011:668.
  • 9王利明.惩罚性赔偿研究[J].中国社会科学,2000(4):112-122. 被引量:838
  • 10Richard A. Posner: Economic Analysis of Law[M]. Little, Brown and Co., 1992.

二级参考文献67

  • 1叶知年,刘小川.我国食品侵权惩罚性赔偿制度的完善探讨[J].海峡法学,2011,13(4):65-71. 被引量:5
  • 2石睿.美德两国惩罚性赔偿之当前发展[J].法制与社会,2007(2):24-27. 被引量:29
  • 3陈聪富.《美国法上之惩罚性赔偿金制度》[J].台大法学论丛,2002,(5).
  • 4Note, "Exemplary Damages in the Law of Torts", 70 Harv. L. Rev. 517, 517 (1957), and Huckle v.Money, 95 Eng. Rep. 768 (K. B. 1763).
  • 5Malzof V. United Statea, I 12 S. Ct. 711, 715 (1992).
  • 6Ernet C. Stiefel: "U. S. Punitive Damage Awards in Germany" , 39 The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1991, p. 784.
  • 7TimothyJ. Phillips ,"The Punitive Dawage Class Action: A Solution to the problem of Multiple punishment" ,1984 U. Ill. L. Rev. 153.
  • 8David R. Levy, Note, "Punitive Damages in Light of TXO Productions Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp",39 St. Louis U, L. J. 409, 412 n. 20 (1994).
  • 9Ausness, Retribution and Deterrence : The Role of Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litation , 74 K y.L. J. 1,2 (1985).
  • 10Coryell v. Colbaugh, 1 N. J. L. 90, 91 (Sup. Ct. 1791).

共引文献899

同被引文献256

引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部