期刊文献+

竞争风险模型在肿瘤治疗临床试验中的应用研究 被引量:2

Application of competing risk model to clinic trials for tumor treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的将竞争风险模型应用到肿瘤治疗临床试验的分析中。方法为了评价某药作为化疗药物的增敏药物治疗非小细胞肺癌、乳腺癌的临床增效作用,采用多中心、随机双盲、前瞻性、安慰剂平行对照设计的Ⅲ期临床试验,运用竞争风险模型,估计2组的累积缓解率和累积进展率,并用Gray检验进行组间比较,同时采用部分分布比例风险模型进行多因素分析。结果对于非小细胞肺癌患者,2组化疗后累积缓解率和累积进展率的差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000,P=0.001),用药、年龄和肿瘤大小是化疗后病情缓解的影响因素,而用药、性别、年龄和肿瘤大小是化疗后病情进展的影响因素;对于乳腺癌患者,2组化疗后累积缓解率的差异有统计学意义,而累积进展率的差异无统计学意义,用药和肿瘤大小是化疗后病情缓解的影响因素,年龄和肿瘤大小是化疗后病情进展的影响因素。结论在有竞争风险存在的情况下,应该使用累积发生函数及部分分布风险模型进行分析,其结论更符合实际。 Objective To apply the competing risk model to the analysis of clinical trials for tumor treatment. Methods A multi-center, randomized, double-blind, prospective, placebo parallel control design, phase Ⅲ clinical trial was preformed to evaluate the clinical synergism of a medicine served as chemosensitizer for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer. The competing risk model was used to estimate the rates of cumulative remission and cumulative progression in both groups and comparison was conducted between groups with Gray test. The sub-distribution hazard model was used to perform the multivariate analysis. Results For non-small cell lung cancer patients, the differences in rates of cumulative remission and cumulative progression in two groups after chemotherapy were statistically significant (P=0. 000, P=0. 001). Medications, age, and tumor size were factors influencing the remission after chemotherapy, while medications, sex, age, and tumor size were factors influencing the progression after chemotherapy. For breast cancer patients, the difference in cumulative remission rate in two groups after chemotherapy was statistically significant and the difference in cumulative progression rate in two groups after chemotherapy was not statistically significant. Medications and tumor size were factors influencing the remission after chemotherapy, while age and tumor size were factors influencing the progression after chemotherapy. Conclusion Cumulative incidence function and sub- distribution hazard model should be used if the competing risk exists because the results are more in line with the actual situation.
作者 张莉娜
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期1011-1017,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基金 上海交通大学医学院科技基金(14XJ10049)~~
关键词 竞争风险 Gray检验 累积发生函数 部分分布比例风险模型 competing risk Gray test cumulative incidence function proportional sub-distribution hazardmodel
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1戚晴,王洪源,任倩,纪立农.竞争风险模型在2型糖尿病治疗临床试验中的应用[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(12):245-249. 被引量:3
  • 2卢梓航,周立志,韩栋,周燕丰,陈征.竞争风险型数据的统计处理及应用[J].现代预防医学,2013,40(5):804-807. 被引量:8
  • 3江一涛,胡海兰,魏巧玲,方亚.竞争风险模型的发展与应用[J].中国卫生统计,2009,26(4):445-447. 被引量:11
  • 4Allignol A, Beyersmann J. Software for fitting non-standard sub- distribution hazards models[J].Biostatisties, 2010, 11 (4) : 674 -675.
  • 5Bajorunaite R, Klein J. Comparison of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks [J]. J Stat Comput Sim, 2008, 78 (10) : 95l -966.
  • 6Cortese G, Andersen P. Competing risks and time-dependent covariates [J]. Biom J, 2010, 52(1): 138 -158.
  • 7Glynn R, Rosner B. Evaluation of risk factors for cataract types in a competing risks framework [ J]. Ophthalmic Epidemiol, 2009, 16 (2): 98 -106.
  • 8Putter H, Fioceo M, Gesqus R. Tutorial in biostatisties: competing risks and multi-state models [J].Star Med, 2007, 26 ( 11 ) : 2277 - 2432.
  • 9Saha P, Heagerty P. Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks[J]. Biometrics, 2010, 66(4): 999- 1011.
  • 10Klein J. Moderlling competing risks in cancer studies [ J ]. Stat Med, 2006, 25(6) : 1015 -1034.

二级参考文献21

  • 1方亚,Hein Putter.Probability Prediction in Multistate Survival Models for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Medical Sciences),2005,25(1):100-103. 被引量:1
  • 2赵耐青,高峻.多结局Cox模型在医学中的应用和Stata实现[J].中国医院统计,2004,11(4):305-308. 被引量:3
  • 3孙尚拱.医学多变量统计与统计软件[M]北京:北京医科大学出版社,2000261-263.
  • 4Bakoyannis G,Touloumi G. Practical methods for competing risks data:A review[J].Statistical Methods in Medical Research,2011.
  • 5Grunkemeier GL,Jin R,Eijkemans MJ. Actual and actuarial probabilities of competing risks:apples and lemons[J].Annals of Thoracic Surgery,2007.1586-1592.
  • 6Southern DA,Faris PD,Brant R. Kaplan-Meier methods yielded misleading results in competing risk scenarios[J].Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,2006.1110-1114.
  • 7Klein JPpeting risks. John Wiley & Sons,Inc[J].WIREs Comp Stat,2010.333-339.
  • 8Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk[J].Annals of Statistics,1988.1141-1154.
  • 9Fine JP,Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1999.496-509.
  • 10Putter H,Fiocco M,Geskus RB. Tutorial in biostatistics:competing risks and multi-state models[J].Statistics in Medicine,2007.2389-2430.

共引文献19

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部