期刊文献+

高等教育学术质量保障的三种机制——基于发达国家实践的考察 被引量:1

Three Kinds of Mechanisms for Academic Quality Assurance of Higher Education——Based on the Practice of Developed Countries
原文传递
导出
摘要 伴随经济全球化和高等教育大众化、国际化,高等教育的学术质量保障成为世界范围内的重要议题。西方发达国家主要存在三种高等教育学术质量保障机制,一是基于学术寡头权威的行业自律;二是以消费者主导为假设的市场调节机制;三是高等教育质量的国家规制。三种机制的运行逻辑不同,不同发达国家的选择和侧重也各有差异。对我国高等教育的启示是,要警惕和规避管理主义的消极后果,正确对待文化、体制和结构的双重作用,合理发挥非政府组织的作用,协调行业自律、市场调节和国家规制三种机制,合力保障和提升高等教育质量。 Along with the economic globalization, the massification and internationalization of higher education, academic quality assurance of higher education has become an important issue around the world. There are three major kinds of mechanisms for higher education quality assurance in western developed countries. Firstly, the professional regulation which is based on the authority of academic oligarchy ; secondly, the market regulation mechanism which assuming that consumers dominance; thirdly, the state regulation of the higher education quality. The operational logic of the three mechanisms are different and dif- ferent developed countries have different choice. It shows that, we should be vigilant of the negative consequences of managerialism and try to avoid it, pay attention to the role of NGOs and correctly deal with the dual function of culture, system and structure, in addition, coordinate the role of professional self regulation, market regulation and state direct regulation for higher education quality assurance and improvement.
作者 胡仲勋
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期1-11,共11页 Journal of Higher Education
关键词 高等教育 学术质量 质量保障机制 规制 higher education academic quality quality assurance mechanism regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Clark B R. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-national Perspective [M]. Berke- ley: The University of California Press, 1983.
  • 2Elaine El-Khawas,陈小红.变革与绩效:高等教育的质量保障[J].复旦教育论坛,2004,2(3):55-59. 被引量:11
  • 3SACHS I. Strange Yet Compatible Bedfel!.ows: Quali- ty Assurance and Quality Improvement[J]. Australian Universities' Review, 1994, (1) .. 24-25.
  • 4EUSTACE R B. Gold, Silver, Copper.. Standards of First Degree[M~//BERDAHL R O, MOODIE G C, SPITZBERG JR I J. Quality and Access in Higher Ed- ucation.. Comparing Britain and the United States of America. Buckingham~ SRHE and Open University Press,1991:29-41.
  • 5加里·S·贝克尔.人力资本:特别是关于教育的理论与经验分析[M].梁小民译.北京:北京大学出版社,1987.
  • 6全球大学联盟.2007年世界高等教育报告[R].汪利兵,阚阅,译.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2009:3.
  • 7ASTIN A W. Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in High- er Education IMp. San Francisco, London: Jossey- Bass Publishers, 1985 ~ 2a-25.
  • 8刘海燕.美国高等教育增值评价模式的兴起与应用[J].高等教育研究,2012,33(5):96-101. 被引量:61
  • 9阎光才.研究型大学中本科教学与科学研究间关系失衡的迷局[J].高等教育研究,2012,33(7):38-45. 被引量:52
  • 10DILL D D, BEERKENS M. Introduction FM3//Dill D D,BEERKENS M. Public Policy for Aca-demic Quality: Analyses of Innovative Policy Instru- ments. Dordrecht.. Springer, 2010 : 6,7-10,9.

二级参考文献132

  • 1陈群.拯救学校——美国纽约学校体制改革[J].上海教育,1994,0(22):19-19. 被引量:1
  • 2张民选.关于高等教育认证机制的研究[J].教育研究,2005,26(2):37-44. 被引量:49
  • 3章建石.增值评价法-关注学生的实际进步.评鉴双月刊,2007,(8):3-3.
  • 4约翰·布瑞兰.欧洲高等教育评估[A].谷贤林等译.国家、高等教育与市场[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2005.214-228.
  • 5Ben David, Joseph. (1971). The Scientist's Role in Society: A Comparative Study. Prentice Hall : Englewood Cliffs.
  • 6Brandt, Reinhard. (2003). Universitat zwischen Selbst-und Fremdbestimmung. Kants "Streit der Fakultaten". Mit einem Anhang zu Heideggers " Rektoratsrede". (Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie-Sonderband 5). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
  • 7Conze, Werner. (1972). Beruf. pp. 490-507. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, edited by Brunner, Otto et al. Vol. 1, (Stuttgart: Mohr).
  • 8Frijhoff, Wilhelmus Theodorus Maria. (1979). Surplus ou deficit? Hypotheses sur le nombre r6el des 6tudiants en Allemagne a l'epoque moderne (1576-1815). Francia. 7: 173- 218.
  • 9Hansmann, Henry. (1990). Why Do Universities Have Endowments? Journal of Legal Studies. 19, no. 1: 3-42.
  • 10Hohn, Hans-Willy and Uwe Schimank. (1990). Konflikte und Gleichgewichte im Forschungssystem. Akteurkonstellationen und Entwicklungspfade in der staatlich finanzierten ausseruniversitaren Forschung. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

共引文献339

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部