期刊文献+

胆囊泥沙样与非泥沙样结石保胆取石术后复发情况的比较 被引量:6

Recurrence after gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy for sand-like and non-sand-like gallstones: a comparative analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较胆囊泥沙样结石与非泥沙样结石患者行腹腔镜胆囊切开取石术后1-3年结石复发情况。方法对2012年10月-2014年12月在空军总医院行保胆治疗的155例胆囊结石患者进行回顾性分析,分为泥沙样结石组(n=29)和非泥沙样结石组(n=126)。观察术后1-3年结石复发情况。计量资料组间比较采用t检验,计数资料组间比较采用χ^2检验。结果 2组患者手术时间比较差异有统计学意义[(126.13±20.52)min vs(75.64±16.58)min,t=7.709,P〈0.001]。术后1-3年泥沙样结石组共有6例复发,1、2、3年复发率分别为13.79%、20.69%、20.69%;非泥沙样结石组共有8例复发,1、2、3年复发率分别为3.97%、6.35%、6.35%;其中2、3年复发率2组间比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2值均为4.284,P值均为0.038)。结论胆囊泥沙样结石患者复发率明显高于非泥沙样结石患者,手术时间也明显延长,因此胆囊泥沙样结石患者应避免行保胆取石术。 Objective To investigate the recurrence at 1- 3 years after laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy in patients with sand- like and non-sand- like gallstones. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 155 patients with gallstones who underwent gallbladder- preserving cholecystolithotomy in Air Force General Hospital,PLA from October 2012 to December 2014,and these patients were divided into sand- like stone group( 29 patients) and non- sand- like stone group( 126 patients). The recurrence of stones was observed at1- 3 years after surgery. The t- test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups,and the chi- square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. Results The time of operation showed a significant difference between the sand- like stone group and the non- sand- like stone group( 126. 13 ± 20. 52 min vs 75. 64 ± 16. 58 min,t = 7. 709,P〈0. 001). At 1- 3 years after surgery,6 patients in the sand- like stone group and 8 in the non- sand- like stone group experienced recurrence,and the 2- and 3- year recurrence rates showed significant differences between the two groups( 2- year recurrence rate: 20. 69% vs 6. 35%,χ^2= 4. 284,P =0. 038; 3- year recurrence rate: 20. 69% vs 6. 35%,χ^2= 4. 284,P = 0. 038). Conclusion The patients with sand- like gallstones have a significantly higher recurrence rate and a significantly longer time of operation than those with non- sand- like gallstones,and therefore,they should avoid gallbladder- preserving cholecystolithotomy.
出处 《临床肝胆病杂志》 CAS 2016年第7期1351-1353,共3页 Journal of Clinical Hepatology
基金 首都卫生发展科研专项(2011-2041-02) "十二五"全军后勤科研计划项目(BWS12J029)
关键词 胆囊结石病 腹腔镜检查 复发 cholecystolithiasis laparoscopy recurrence
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献42

  • 1林擎天.有关胆囊切除术后综合征问题[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2005,17(1):3-4. 被引量:32
  • 2张宝善.关于胆囊结石治疗的争论——与Langenbuch理论商榷[J].中国医刊,2007,42(5):2-5. 被引量:164
  • 3中国成人血脂异常防治指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(5):390-419. 被引量:5221
  • 4Strasberg SM. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the introduction of innovative surgical procedures [ J]. Ann Surg, 2012,256( 1 ) :7-9.
  • 5Ostlie DJ, Sharp NE, Thomas P, et al. Patient scar assessment af- ter single-incision versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial [ J ]. J Laparoendnsc Adv Surg Tech A,2013,23(6) :553-555.
  • 6Taechino R, Greco F, Matera D. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar[ J]. Surg Endose, 2009,23(4) :896-899.
  • 7Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopie cholecystectomy: results of a national survey [ J ]. Ann Surg,2001,234(4) :549-559.
  • 8Savassi-Rocha PR, Almeida SR, Sanches MD, et al. latrogenic bile duct injuries[ J]. Surg Endosc,2003,17(9) :1356-1361.
  • 9Connor S, Garden OJ. Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [ J ]. Br J Surg,2006,93 (2) : 158-168.
  • 10Wagner M J, Kern H, Hapfelmeier A, et al. Single-port cholecys- tectomy versus muhi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients[J]. World J Surg,2013,37 (5) :991- 998.

共引文献39

同被引文献93

引证文献6

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部