期刊文献+

不同溶栓时间窗信息对脑梗死患者溶栓决策行为的影响 被引量:12

Effects of thrombolytic infornmtion in different time windows upon thrombolytic decision maldng in patients with cerebral infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的在“急性脑梗死溶栓治疗”情境下,探讨框架信息与溶栓时间窗信息对脑梗死患者及其家属溶栓风险决策的影响。方法以神经内科住院及门诊的脑梗死患者及其家属(n=327)为研究对象,将其随机分为正面框架组(n=187)和负面框架组(n=140),每组被试均接受三种不同溶栓时间窗条件下的溶栓风险信息。结果无论在何种溶栓时间窗条件下,被试在正面框架和负面框架信息条件下溶栓倾向差异无统计学意义(0~90min:χ^2=1.24,P〉0.05;91~180min:χ^2=0.35,P〉0.05;181~270min:χ^2=0.07,P〉0.05);在负面框架条件下,与接受181-270min溶栓信息相比,被试在接受0-90min溶栓信息时溶栓倾向显著增强(6913%vs51.5%,P〈0.05)。结论溶栓信息框架与溶栓时间窗共同作用影响被试的溶栓决策偏好。应根据不同的溶栓时间节点向患者呈现相应的溶栓风险信息。 Objective To discuss the influence of framing information and time window information upon risk decision making about thrombolysis therapy in patients with cerebral infarction or their relatives in the scenarios of thrombolytic therapy for acute cerebral infarction. Methods Inpatients and outpatients with cerebral infarction or their relatives( n= 327) were randomly divided into positive framing group( n= 187) and negative framing group( n= 140). Every participant underwent risky messages about thrombolytic treat- ment in three different time windows:0-90 minutes, 91-180 minutes and 181-270 minutes. Results In any thrombolytic time window condition, there was no significant difference in thrombolytic tendency of partici- pants between the positive framing group and the negative framing group (0-90 min:χ^2 = 1.24, P〉 0.05 ;91- 180 minutes :χ^2 = 0.35,P〉0.05 ; 181-270 minutes : χ^2 = 0.07,P〉0.05) .In a negative framework conditions, compared with the participants receiving thrombolytic information in 181-270 minutes time window,subjects receiving thrombolytic information in 0-90 minutes window were more tolerant of thrombolytic treatment ( 69.3 % vs 51.5 %, P〈0.0125). Conclusion There are mutual effects of time window and framing information upon participants' preferences for thrombolysis. Different thrombolytic information are presented according to their corresponding time windows.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期605-608,共4页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 北京市自然科学基金项目(7153176,7123230) 北京市科技新星项目(xx2016096) 中国博士后基金面上项目(2014M562655) 国家自然科学基金项目(31000461)
关键词 风险决策 框架效应 溶栓时间窗 Risky decision making Framing effect Thrombolytic time window
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1谢晓非,王晓田.成就动机与机会-威胁认知[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):192-199. 被引量:55
  • 2Li S,J Economic Behavior Organization,1996年,29卷,355页
  • 3Li S,Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes,1995年,62卷,216页
  • 4Li S,Dissertation Abstracts Int: Section B: Sciences Engineering,1994年,55卷,4-B期,1658页
  • 5Li S,J Behavioral Decision Making,1993年,6卷,271页
  • 6Scott P.决策与判断[M] //施俊琦,王星,译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2005:84-96.
  • 7Simon HA.Rational choice and the structure of the environment[J] .Psychol Rev,1956,63(2):129-138.
  • 8Tversky A,Kahneman D.The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice[J] .Science,1981,211:453-458.
  • 9McNeil B J,Pauker SG,Sox HC,et al.On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies[J] .New Engl J Med,1982,306:1259-1262.
  • 10Meyerowitz BE,Chaiken S.The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes,intentions,and behavior[J] .J Pers Soc Psych,1987,52(3):500-510.

共引文献62

同被引文献100

引证文献12

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部