期刊文献+

基于标准的教师评价模型构建 被引量:2

Constructing Standard-based Model of Teacher Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教师专业标准为教师专业发展提供了基本准则和评价依据,但是部分中小学校尤其是农村中小学校对于教师专业标准的重要意义缺乏足够的认识,更缺乏基于教师专业标准构建教师评价体系的意识和能力。构建基于标准的教师评价模型,为中小学校构建基于教师专业标准,并切合自身发展实际的教师评价体系提供理论支撑尤为必要。基于标准的教师评价模型由"四导向、四原则、四分层"构成。"四导向"为教师评价价值定位,即统筹全面评价与个性评价的目标导向,统筹行政功能与发展功能的功能导向,统筹教师自评与他评的文化导向,统筹过程监测与结果反馈的机制导向;"四原则"为教师评价指标遴选原则,即基础性、校本性、稳定性、发展性;"四分层"为教师评价的实施策略,即分层评价实现评价主体的多元化,分层数据实现资料收集的系统化,分层指标实现质性指标数量化,分层报告实现评价反馈专业化。 Professional Standard of Teachers provides the basic criterion and evaluation foundation for professional development of teachers. However,primary and secondary schools especially the rural primary and secondary schools are lack of awareness of the importance of Professional Standard of Teachers, and are still further lack of constructing eval- uation system for teachers based on Professional Standard of Teachers. Therefore, it is particularly necessary to provide theoretical support for primary and secondary schools to construct teacher evaluation system, which is standard-based and in keeping with the real conditions of them. The standard-based teacher evaluation model is consisted of "four ori- entations, four principles, four layers". The "four orientations" are the value orientations for teacher evaluation, which are the target orientation coordinating all-around development and personality development, the function orientation co- ordinating administrative function and developmental function, the culture orientation coordinating self-evaluation and heter-evaluation, the mechanism orientation coordinating process monitoring and result feedback; The "four principles" are principles for selecting indexes for teacher evaluation ,which are fundamental, school-based, stable, developmental; The "four layers" are the application strategies for teacher evaluation, which are layering evaluation to realize diversifi- cation of evaluation objectives, layering data to realize systematization of material collecting, layering index to realize quantization of qualitative indexes, layering report to realize specialization of evaluation feedback.
出处 《教育理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期32-36,共5页 Theory and Practice of Education
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项课题<中小学发展性教师绩效统计和测评模型研究>(项目编号:XDJK2014D018)的研究成果
关键词 教师专业标准 教师评价模型 构建教师评价体系 professional standard of teachers teacher evaluation model construction of teacher evaluation system
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1教育部.2013年全国教育事业发展统计公报[DB/OL].(2014—7)[2014—11—12].http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe——633/201407/171144.html.
  • 2Liu,S.,& Teddlie, C. A Follow-up Study on Teacher Evalua- tion in China: Historical Analysis and Latest Trends[J].Journalof Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2005, ( 18 ) : 253-272.
  • 3Shujie Liu & Decheng Zhao. Teacher Evaluation in China: Lat- est Trends and Future Directions(J ~. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2013, (3) : 231-250.
  • 4教育部.教育部关于印发《基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)》的通知[DB/OL].(2001—6—8)[2014—11—12].http://www.gov.crdgongbao/content/2002/content_61386.htm.
  • 5教育部.中学教师专业标准(试行)[DB/OL].(2011-12—12)[2014—11-12).http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htm-lfiles/moe/s6127/201112/127830.html.
  • 6James Nolan, JR & Linda A. Hoover. Teacher Supervision and Evaluation: Theory into Practice[M ]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2005,210-211.220.
  • 7Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. Teacher Evaluation to Enhance Professional Practice[ M]. Alexandria, VA : Association for Su- pervision and Curriculum Development, 2000.
  • 8朱旭东.论教师专业发展的理论模型建构[J].教育研究,2014,35(6):81-90. 被引量:338
  • 9宁虹.教师能力标准理论模型[J].教育研究,2010,31(11):77-82. 被引量:55
  • 10Peterson,K. Teacher Evaluation:A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practice[M ] .Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin, 2000.243.

二级参考文献11

  • 1卢正芝,洪松舟.我国教师能力研究三十年历程之述评[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(01B):70-74. 被引量:86
  • 2Anthony J. Shinkfield & Daniel Stufflebeam, Teacher Evaluation: Guide to Effective Practice [ M ]. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995. 87 - 88.
  • 3乔纳森.H.特纳(邱泽奇,张茂元等译).社会学理论的结构[M].北京:华夏出版社,2006.177.
  • 4Lucia, A.D. & Lepsinger, R. The Art and Science of Competency Models: Pinpointing Critical Success Factors in Organizations[M].Jossey--Base/Pfeifer, San Francisco, 1999.
  • 5克莱因.教师能力标准[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007.
  • 6倪良康.自识与反思[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002.494.
  • 7朱旭东.教师专业发展理论研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2012.
  • 8劳伦斯·马奇,布伦达·麦克伊沃.怎样做文献综述[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2011.42-43.
  • 9劳伦斯.纽曼.社会研究方法:定性和定量的取向[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.55.
  • 10蒋斌,等.社会科学理论模型图典[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2012.

共引文献417

同被引文献59

引证文献2

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部