期刊文献+

改良版营养风险筛查评估量表在中晚期肿瘤患者中的应用效果 被引量:19

Application effects of improved nutritional risk screening assessment scale in patients with middle or late stage tumor
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨改良版营养风险筛查评估量表在中晚期肿瘤患者营养筛查中的适用性。方法采用方便抽样法抽取300例中晚期肿瘤患者,在患者入院24~72 h采用改良版营养风险筛查评估量表、微型营养评定法( MNA)、主观整体营养评估量表( SGA)进行营养筛查,同时测量血清蛋白及计算体质量指数( BMI)。通过受试者工作特征曲线( ROC)测量筛查工具的特异度、灵敏度等,通过Kappa值分析一致性。结果300例患者均完成营养风险筛查评估,SGA测得患者营养不良发生率为54%。以SGA为金标准,改良版营养风险筛查评估量表的特异度、灵敏度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、Kappa值及Youden指数分别为0.986,0.927,0.986,0.919,0.907,0.910;MNA分别为0.781,0.854,0.827,0.842,0.664,0.635。结论改良版营养风险筛查评估量表的特异度、灵敏度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值等均高于MNA,与SGA一致性较好,且评估方法简单易行,适用于中晚期肿瘤患者的营养风险筛查。 Objective To explore the adoption of improved nutritional risk screening assessment scale ( INRSAS) in nutritional screening of middle or late stage tumor patients. Methods In according with the convenient method, 300 patients with middle or late stage tumor were selected, were monitored nutrition by INRSAS, mini nutritional assessment ( MNA) , and subjective global assessment ( SGA) , and measured serum protein and body mass index. Receiver operator characteristic curve ( ROC ) was utilized to screen tool′s specificity, sensitivity, etc. , and the value of Kappa was used to analyze the uniformity. Results After the 300 completed SGA, it showed that the incidence of malnutrition was 54%. Setting SGA as standard, INRSAS′s specificity, sensitivity, positive predicted value, negative predicted value, Kappa value, and Youden index were 0. 986, 0. 927, 0. 986, 0. 919, 0. 907, 0. 910; MNA were 0. 781, 0. 854, 0. 827, 0. 842, 0. 664, 0. 635. Conclusions INRSAS′s specificity, sensitivity, positive predicted value, and negative predicted value are higher than MNA′s, and have a good uniformity with SGA. The assessment method of INRSAS is simple and easily implements which is suitable for nutrition risk screening for patients with middle and late stage.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2016年第5期643-646,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 国家临床重点专科建设项目 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院青年基金项目
关键词 营养评价 肿瘤 主观整体营养评估量表( SGA) 微型营养评定法( MNA) Nutrition assessment Tumor Subjective global assessment Mini nutritional assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献142

  • 1陈伟,蒋朱明,张永梅,王秀荣,陈春明,史轶蘩.欧洲营养不良风险调查方法在中国住院患者的临床可行性研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(3):137-141. 被引量:215
  • 2蒋朱明,陈伟,张澍田.中国11个城市大医院6个临床专科5303例住院患者营养不良风险筛查(期中小结摘要)[J].中国临床营养杂志,2006,14(4):263-263. 被引量:83
  • 3[1]Lindley D V,Smith A F M.Bayes estimates for the linear model.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,Series B,1972,34:1-41
  • 4[2]Smith A F M.A general Bayesian linear model.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,Series B,1973,35:67-75
  • 5[3]Mason W M,Wong G M,Entwistle B.Contextual Analysis Through the Multilevel Linear Model.In:Leinhardt S,ed.Sociological Methodology,San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,1983,72-103
  • 6[4]Goldstein H.Multilevel Statistical Models.2nd ed,New York:John Wiley,1995
  • 7[5]Elston R C,Grizzle J E.Estimation of time response curves and their confidence bands.Biometrics,1962,18:148-159
  • 8[6]Laird N M,Ware H.Random-effects models for longitudinal data.Biometrics,1982,38:963-974
  • 9[7]Longford N.A fast scoring algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation in unbalanced models with nested random effects.Biometrika,1987,74:817-827
  • 10[8]Singer J D.Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models,hierarchical models and individual growth models.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,1998,23:323-355

共引文献455

同被引文献146

引证文献19

二级引证文献132

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部