期刊文献+

野菊多糖对白术土传病害的防效试验 被引量:5

Control Efficacies of Polysaccharide from Chrysanthemum indicum L. against Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz. Soil-borne Disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究了野菊多糖对白术土传病害的防治效果,试验分为温室盆栽试验和大田试验两部分。温室盆栽试验表明,0.2、2和20 mg/m L的野菊多糖药剂在药后10 d对白术土传病害的防控效果分别为6.277%、83.863%和71.839%;田间试验表明,0.4、2和20 mg/m L的野菊多糖药剂在用药后60 d对白术土传病害的防效分别达到57.836%、74.925%和82.470%,其中2和20 mg/m L的野菊多糖药剂对白术病害的防效显著高于常用药剂百菌清。同时野菊多糖对田间白术有较好的促生作用,0.4、2和20 mg/m L的野菊多糖药剂分别比百菌清药剂组单位面积产量增产了17.647%、14.706%和32.353%。 Control efficacies of polysaccharide from Chrysanthemum indicum L. against Atracfylodes macrocephala Koidz. soil-borne diseases were investigated. The test divided into two parts, pot experiment in greenhouse and field experiment. The results of pot experiment showed that control efficacies were 6.277%, 83.863% and 71.839% when treated with 0.2, 2 and 20 mg/mL of polysaccharide after 10 days, respectively. And field experiment results showed that control efficacies were 57.836%, 74.925% and 82.470% when treated with 0.4, 2 and 20 mg/mL ofpolysaccharide after 60 days, respectively. Especially, the control efficacies of 2 and 20 mg/mL ofpolysaccharide were significantly higher than the commonly used TPN. Moreover, polysaccharide from C. indicum could improve the yield of A. macrocephala in the field. The per unit yield of 0.4, 2 and 20 mg/mL of polysaccharide increased by 17.647%, 14.706% and 32.353% than pesticide treatment, respectively.
出处 《中国生物防治学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期539-543,共5页 Chinese Journal of Biological Control
基金 浙江省自然科学基金(LY13C140006)
关键词 白术 野菊多糖 防治效果 Atractylodes macrocephala polysaccharide from Chrysanthemum indicum control effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Kuc J. Development and future direction of induced systemic resistance in plants[J]. Crop Protection, 2000, 19(8): 859-861.
  • 2蔡新忠,郑重.水杨酸诱导水稻幼苗抗瘟性的生化机制[J].植物病理学报,1997,27(3):231-236. 被引量:71
  • 3Gorlach J, Volrath S G, Hengy G, et al. Benzothiadiazole, a novel class of inducers of systemic acquired resistance, activates gene expression and disease resistance in wheat[J]. The Plant Cell, 1996, 8(4): 629-643.
  • 4Alabouvette C, Olivain C, Steinberg C. Biological control of plant diseases: the European situation[J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2006, 114(3): 329-341.
  • 5Cruickshank I. The isolation and partial characterization of monilicolin A, a polypeptide with phaseollin-inducing activity from Monilinia fructicola[J]. Life Sciences, 1968, 7(10): 449-458.
  • 6李洪连,王守正,王金生,张学君.黄瓜对炭疽病诱导抗性的初步研究Ⅱ.诱导抗病机制的研究[J].植物病理学报,1993,23(4):327-332. 被引量:50
  • 7潘亚清,史淑芝.植物的诱导抗病性研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(8):366-369. 被引量:14
  • 8Du N, Tian W, Zheng D, et al. Extraction, purification and elicitor activities of polysaccharides from chrysanthemum indicum[J]. Internatoinal Journal of Biological Macromoleculars, 2016, 82(1): 347-354.
  • 9Jwa N S, Agrawal G K, Tamogami S, et al. Role of defense/stress-related marker genes, proteins and secondary metabolites in defining rice self-defense mechanisms[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2006, 44(5-6): 261-273.
  • 10李洪连,王守正,袁红霞,王振跃,梁金兰.植物诱导抗病性研究的现状与展望[J].河南农业大学学报,1994,28(3):219-223. 被引量:28

二级参考文献60

共引文献161

同被引文献50

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部