期刊文献+

中国工业企业增长质量的分布特征变动与差异分解研究 被引量:5

Study on the Distribution Change and Difference Decomposition of the Growth Quality of Chinese Industrial Enterprises
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对公有制和非公有制工业企业增长质量的差异进行静态、动态等多重分解研究,全面分析两类工业企业的增长质量差异及其变动特征。结果显示,由于公有制企业的制度优势以及政策的"所有制偏好",公有制工业企业的增长质量高于非公有制工业企业。与要素投入的特征相比,要素回报在公有制与非公有制两类企业增长质量差异中的作用更为重要。此外,两类工业企业增长质量的差距逐渐缩小,以公有制为基础多种所有制工业企业增长质量协同提升的格局逐渐形成。 This paper researches on the differences and their variations between the growth quality of public and non-public ownership enterprises using static and dynamic de- composition methods. The results show that due to the superiority of ownership system and "ownership preference" in policy making, the growth quality of public ownership enterprises is higher than that of non-public enterprises. Compared with the factors' input, factors' re- turn has a more significant role in the differences' formation of growth quality between public and non-public ownership enterprises. And the gap is narrowing between the two kinds of in- dustrial enterprises. The collaborative improvement pattern of various ownership industrial enterprises' growth quality has gradually formed.
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期13-29,共17页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目“中国高技术产业 R&D 投入对技术创新的内在驱动机制研究:结构变化、两面性与政策效应”(71303035) 国家社会科学基金重大项目“新常态下我国宏观经济监测和预测研究” (15DZA011) 辽宁省高等学校优秀人才支持计划“高技术产业中研发投入对技术进步的影响机制研究”(WJQ2013025)的资助
关键词 工业企业 增长质量 静态OB 动态JMP Industrial Enterprises Growth Quality Static OB Dynamic JMP
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Autor D. H. , Katz L. F. , Kearney M. S. , 2005, Rising Wage Inequality &TheRole of Composi- tion and Prices [R]. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers, No. 11628.
  • 2AcemogluD., 2002, Directed Technical Change [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 69 (4), 781-809.
  • 3Brant L., Tombe T., Zhu X.D., 2013, Factor Market Distortions Across Time, Space and Sec- tors in China [J]. Review of Economic Dynamics, 16 (1), 39-58.
  • 4Demsetz H. , 1973, Industry Structure Market Rivalry and Public Policy [J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 1-10.
  • 5Dewenter K. L. , Malatesta P. H. , 2001, State-owned and Privately-owned Firms & An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage and Labor Intensity [J]. The American Economic Review, 91 (1), 320-334.
  • 6Goldeng E. , Grunfeld L. A. , Benito G. R. , 2008, The Performance Differential between Pri- vate and State Owned Enterprises &The Roles of Ownership, Management and Market Structure [J]. Jour- nal of Management Studies, 45, 1244-1273.
  • 7Hirshleifer D., Hsu P.H., Li D.M., 2013, Innovative Efficiency and Stock Returns [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 107, 632-654.
  • 8Jefferson G., 2003, Potential Source of Productivity Growth within Chinese Industry [J]. World Development, 17, 45-57.
  • 9Mahadevan R., 2000, How Technically Efficient are Singapore's Manufacturing Industries [J]. Applied Economics, 32, 2007-2014.
  • 10Melly B. , 2005, Decomposition of Differences in Distribution Using Quantile Regression [J]. Labor Economics, 12 (4), 577-590.

二级参考文献193

共引文献1625

同被引文献91

引证文献5

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部